[PATCH] drm/ttm: remove EBUSY handling in ttm_execbuf_util

[Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>]

How is this different from just calling with no_wait == false?
As far as I can tell, both paths end up with the same result..
    
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
index 3f48a46..4e7b596 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
@@ -82,22 +82,6 @@ static void ttm_eu_list_ref_sub(struct list_head *list)
 	}
 }
 
-static int ttm_eu_wait_unreserved_locked(struct list_head *list,
-					 struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
-{
-	struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bo->glob;
-	int ret;
-
-	ttm_eu_del_from_lru_locked(list);
-	spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-	ret = ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(bo, true);
-	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
-	if (unlikely(ret != 0))
-		ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_locked(list);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-
 void ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(struct list_head *list)
 {
 	struct ttm_validate_buffer *entry;
@@ -152,19 +136,10 @@ retry:
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, list, head) {
 		struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = entry->bo;
 
-retry_this_bo:
-		ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, true, true, true, val_seq);
+		ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, true, false, true, val_seq);
 		switch (ret) {
 		case 0:
 			break;
-		case -EBUSY:
-			ret = ttm_eu_wait_unreserved_locked(list, bo);
-			if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
-				spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-				ttm_eu_list_ref_sub(list);
-				return ret;
-			}
-			goto retry_this_bo;
 		case -EAGAIN:
 			ttm_eu_backoff_reservation_locked(list);
 			spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);