From: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas@shipmail.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: enable render-nodes by default
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:49:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532B0E16.2080005@shipmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140320153423.GB2020@gmail.com>
On 03/20/2014 04:34 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:59:17PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> On 03/20/2014 03:36 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> In any case this is not a render node issue and there is no reasons to force
>>> full VRAM eviction or anything like that.
>> This comment suggests you haven't read the discussion fully.
>>
>> VRAM eviction was discussed in the context of legacy nodes.
>>
>> This is a render node issue because with legacy nodes you can work
>> around insufficient command checking.
>> With render nodes you can't.
> On radeon you can not abuse the GPU period legacy node or not. My comment
> was about the fact that this is a driver issue and not a render node issue.
> I would consider driver that allow to abuse the GPU block to access any
> memory as broken no matter if we are talking about legacy or new render
> node.
>
> Cheers,
> Jérôme
>
Great. Then I assume you don't have an issue with not enabling
render-nodes for those broken drivers,
(or at least a sysfs property or something similar flagging those device
nodes as broken)?
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-16 13:43 [PATCH] drm: enable render-nodes by default David Herrmann
2014-03-17 10:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-17 16:43 ` [PATCH v2] " David Herrmann
2014-03-20 6:43 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-03-20 7:36 ` David Herrmann
2014-03-20 8:48 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-03-20 9:05 ` David Herrmann
2014-03-20 9:27 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-03-20 9:43 ` David Herrmann
2014-03-20 10:28 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-03-20 14:36 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-03-20 14:44 ` Ilia Mirkin
2014-03-20 15:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-03-20 17:39 ` Ilia Mirkin
2014-03-20 14:59 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-03-20 15:34 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-03-20 15:49 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2014-03-20 17:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-03-20 17:34 ` Rob Clark
2014-03-20 20:54 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-03-20 21:13 ` Rob Clark
2014-03-21 7:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-21 8:29 ` Thomas Hellstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532B0E16.2080005@shipmail.org \
--to=thomas@shipmail.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=j.glisse@gmail.com \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox