dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable()
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:40:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53478E65.6090305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53478C42.5080502@ti.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3474 bytes --]

On 11/04/14 09:31, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thursday 10 April 2014 05:17 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been debugging omapdrm issues on top of the latest drm mainline
>> changes. Sometimes a drm_framebuffer ref count drops to -1 when aborting
>> a drm application, or unloading the modules.
>>
>> The setup is very basic, just a single crtc with the crtc's primary
>> plane.
>>
>> What seems to happen is:
>>
>> - App is started
>>
>> - fb is created, and taken into use by omapdrm. omapdrm takes a ref to
>> the fb.
>>
>> - the app is starts to shut down
>>
>> - drm_framebuffer_remove is called
> 
> Does drm_framebuffer_remove get called when we abort the application, or
> unload omapdrm, or both?

Both. When we abort an app, drm_framebuffer_remove gets called for the
fb that the app created. When we unload omapdrm, it gets called for the
main fb, used for fb console.

>> - fb->refcount.refcount > 1, so it goes to disable stuff
>>
>> - drm_plane_force_disable is called for the primary plane
> 
> Maybe we need to make sure that this func is called only when our driver
> has unreferenced it. In that case, we would probably need to flush our
> queue and disable interrupts(so that we don't queue more work).

Hmm, sorry, call which func, unreferenced what? =)

Do you mean we should call drm_framebuffer_remove() only if
fb->refcount.refcount == 1. That should be possible, and would probably
remove the issue, but it would just be going around the actual problem.

>> - drm_plane_force_disable does plane->disable_plane, which on omapdrm
>> puts stuff on a workqueue as plane cannot be disabled immediately
>>
>> - drm_plane_force_disable calls __drm_framebuffer_unreference()
>>
>> - at the end of drm_framebuffer_remove(), there's
>> drm_framebuffer_unreference, which causes ref count to go to zero, and
>> the fb to be destroyed
>>
>> - a bit later, the queued work is ran, which does
>> drm_framebuffer_unreference(), and ref count goes to -1. Here omapdrm is
>> removing the ref that had been taken in the beginning.
>>
>>
>> So the explicit unref done by drm_plane_force_disable() seems a bit out
>> of place. I can't figure out which drm_framebuffer_reference() would be
>> the matching one for the unref done by drm_plane_force_disable().
>>
>> Any ideas what ref is that? Or is the __drm_framebuffer_unreference()
>> extra in drm_plane_force_disable()?
> 
> 
> I can't get the corresponding reference for it either. But I can count 3
> of them when you run fbcon with drm's fb helper.
> 
> - One ref is taken in the drm_framebuffer_init called from
> omap_fbdev_create.
> 
> - fbcon will call fb_set_par, which calls drm_fb_helper_set_par, that
> seems to take a refernce to the fb in the end.

This one is not called for a normal app, as there's no fbdev framebuffer
for it. Note that the funcs I mention deal with drm framebuffer, which
is not the fbdev framebuffer (confusing =). fbdev fb is only used for
the "root" framebuffer. And, of course, fbdev fb uses the drm fb
functionality.

> - drm_crtc_helper_set_config() calls the omadrm specific mode_set
> drm_crtc_funcs, which eventually calls a drm_framebuffer_reference in
> update_pin().

Yep.

I forgot to mention that if I comment out the unref in
drm_plane_force_disable(), the ref counts match and all looks fine. And
also that I didn't see this issue with 3.14.

 Tomi



[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-11  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-10 11:47 Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable() Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  6:31 ` Archit Taneja
2014-04-11  6:40   ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2014-04-11  6:57     ` Archit Taneja
2014-04-11  7:03       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  7:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-11 11:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-14  8:43   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15  9:16     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 10:10       ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 10:29         ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-15 10:44           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 12:24             ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 13:30               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 22:01                 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-15 12:00         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 21:57         ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53478E65.6090305@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox