dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable()
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:27:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53479270.6070501@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53478E65.6090305@ti.com>

On Friday 11 April 2014 12:10 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

<snip>

>> Does drm_framebuffer_remove get called when we abort the application, or
>> unload omapdrm, or both?
>
> Both. When we abort an app, drm_framebuffer_remove gets called for the
> fb that the app created. When we unload omapdrm, it gets called for the
> main fb, used for fb console.
>
>>> - fb->refcount.refcount > 1, so it goes to disable stuff
>>>
>>> - drm_plane_force_disable is called for the primary plane
>>
>> Maybe we need to make sure that this func is called only when our driver
>> has unreferenced it. In that case, we would probably need to flush our
>> queue and disable interrupts(so that we don't queue more work).
>
> Hmm, sorry, call which func, unreferenced what? =)
>
> Do you mean we should call drm_framebuffer_remove() only if
> fb->refcount.refcount == 1. That should be possible, and would probably
> remove the issue, but it would just be going around the actual problem.

Yes, I meant our driver should call drm_framebuffer_remove() only when 
we are know that the fb reference omapdrm had taken(the one in 
update_pin), has a corresponding fb unref called(in unpin_worker).

Isn't that something omapdrm should take care of?

<snip>

>> I can't get the corresponding reference for it either. But I can count 3
>> of them when you run fbcon with drm's fb helper.
>>
>> - One ref is taken in the drm_framebuffer_init called from
>> omap_fbdev_create.
>>
>> - fbcon will call fb_set_par, which calls drm_fb_helper_set_par, that
>> seems to take a refernce to the fb in the end.
>
> This one is not called for a normal app, as there's no fbdev framebuffer
> for it. Note that the funcs I mention deal with drm framebuffer, which
> is not the fbdev framebuffer (confusing =). fbdev fb is only used for
> the "root" framebuffer. And, of course, fbdev fb uses the drm fb

Yes. In the case of a normal app, we would call the ADD_FB2 ioctl to get 
a drm_framebuffer, that will internally take a fb reference. So the 
count won't seem to go beyond 2.

> functionality.
>
>> - drm_crtc_helper_set_config() calls the omadrm specific mode_set
>> drm_crtc_funcs, which eventually calls a drm_framebuffer_reference in
>> update_pin().
>
> Yep.
>
> I forgot to mention that if I comment out the unref in
> drm_plane_force_disable(), the ref counts match and all looks fine. And
> also that I didn't see this issue with 3.14.

That's strange. I guess there must be an extra unref happening somewhere 
in the newer commits. Did you try a diff of drm code between the 2 
kernels? :)

Archit

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-11  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-10 11:47 Possible fb ref count issue with drm_plane_force_disable() Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  6:31 ` Archit Taneja
2014-04-11  6:40   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  6:57     ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2014-04-11  7:03       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-11  7:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-11 11:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-14  8:43   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15  9:16     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 10:10       ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 10:29         ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-04-15 10:44           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 12:24             ` Rob Clark
2014-04-15 13:30               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 22:01                 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-15 12:00         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-04-15 21:57         ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53479270.6070501@ti.com \
    --to=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox