From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
"Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>,
sw0312.kim@samsung.com,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: exynos-drm registration: infinite loop
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:51:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <545B448E.7070600@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141106092914.GG26297@ulmo>
On 2014년 11월 06일 18:29, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:23:27PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
>> On 2014년 11월 05일 23:38, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:18:46PM +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I run 3.18-rc3 kernel on BeagleBone Black. It doesn't have Exynos DRM
>>>> of course, but I run multi-platform kernel where CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS is
>>>> set to 'y'.
>>>> The issue here is that the platform probe/init goes to infinite loop
>>>> as the following:
>>>>
>>>> [ 5.717343] platform exynos-drm: Driver exynos-drm requests probe deferral
>>>> [ 5.726848] exynos-drm-ipp exynos-drm-ipp: drm ipp registered successfully.
>>>> [ 5.734700] platform exynos-drm: Driver exynos-drm requests probe deferral
>>>> [ 5.744044] exynos-drm-ipp exynos-drm-ipp: drm ipp registered successfully.
>>>> [ 5.752010] platform exynos-drm: Driver exynos-drm requests probe deferral
>>>> [ 5.761377] exynos-drm-ipp exynos-drm-ipp: drm ipp registered successfully.
>>>> [ 5.769291] platform exynos-drm: Driver exynos-drm requests probe deferral
>>>>
>>>> It is quite unexpectable behavior. I would expect that the exynos-drm
>>>> failed to initialize with 'no device' error.
>>>>
>>>> See also for the reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87691
>>>
>>> The reason for this seems to be that Exynos DRM instantiates a dummy
>>> device that it can bind to (see exynos_drm_init()). Now this code is
>>> executed unconditonally, so the device will be created whether or not
>>> the kernel/module runs on an Exynos SoC. The driver should really bind
>>> to some real device rather than instantiating a dummy. Or if it must
>>> bind to a dummy then the code needs to at least check that it's running
>>> on an Exynos SoC before instantiating the dummy.
>>>
>>
>> Right, I also think the problem is because we use a dummay device for
>> Exynos drm. As you mentioned, this device can always be bound as long as
>> Exynos drm driver is enabled even without real device. So this issue
>> gives us that we need super device node again. Actually, I had already
>> tried the use of the super device node like below for Exynos drm but
>> other Samsung guys didn't want to use it.
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-April/056618.html
>>
>> I think now we have the reason that we should use super device node so I
>> will try to support the super device for Exynos drm like other ARM drm
>> drivers did. However, for this, I'd like to listen to other opinions
>> for a while before that.
>
> Irrespective of any long-term solution you need to fix this as soon as
> possible because this currently causes all sorts of weirdness when
> booting a multi-platform kernel on non-Exynos boards. Probably the
> easiest for now would be to add some soc_is_exynos*() check at the very
> beginning of exynos_drm_init().
Got it.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
>
> Thierry
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-04 17:18 exynos-drm registration: infinite loop Matwey V. Kornilov
2014-11-05 14:38 ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-05 16:47 ` Matwey V. Kornilov
2014-11-06 6:23 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-06 8:03 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-11-06 8:45 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-06 8:49 ` Matwey V. Kornilov
2014-11-06 9:03 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-06 9:29 ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-06 9:51 ` Inki Dae [this message]
2014-11-06 5:45 ` Inki Dae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=545B448E.7070600@samsung.com \
--to=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=matwey.kornilov@gmail.com \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox