From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
To: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
Cc: sw0312.kim@samsung.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
a.hajda@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/exynos: dsi: move TE irq handler registration position
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:49:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54655FB8.9020505@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412144353-13114-7-git-send-email-yj44.cho@samsung.com>
On 2014년 10월 01일 15:19, YoungJun Cho wrote:
> The drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() does dpms control and panel is
> initialized and displayed on by it.
> So should register TE irq handler(exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler())
> beforehand.
This patch also includes some codes not relevant to register TE irq
handler before drm_helper_hpd_irq_event call. How about separating this
patch into two patches?
And below is my comment.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
>
> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> index 24741d8..ded69df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> @@ -1143,6 +1143,7 @@ static int exynos_dsi_init(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> {
> int ret;
> + int te_gpio_irq;
>
> dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(dsi->panel_node, "te-gpios", 0);
> if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
> @@ -1157,14 +1158,10 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * This TE GPIO IRQ should not be set to IRQ_NOAUTOEN, because panel
> - * calls drm_panel_init() first then calls mipi_dsi_attach() in probe().
> - * It means that te_gpio is invalid when exynos_dsi_enable_irq() is
> - * called by drm_panel_init() before panel is attached.
> - */
> - ret = request_threaded_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio),
> - exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
> + te_gpio_irq = gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio);
> +
> + irq_set_status_flags(te_gpio_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
I think with IRQ_NOAUTOEN, te irq wouldn't be enabled automatically. So
shouldn't we call enable_irq() and disable_irq() somewhere?
> + ret = request_threaded_irq(te_gpio_irq, exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE", dsi);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dsi->dev, "request interrupt failed with %d\n", ret);
> @@ -1195,9 +1192,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> dsi->mode_flags = device->mode_flags;
> dsi->panel_node = device->dev.of_node;
>
> - if (dsi->connector.dev)
> - drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dsi->connector.dev);
> -
> /*
> * This is a temporary solution and should be made by more generic way.
> *
> @@ -1211,6 +1205,9 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + if (dsi->connector.dev)
> + drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dsi->connector.dev);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-14 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-01 6:19 [PATCH 0/7] drm/exynos: modify LCD I80 interface display YoungJun Cho
2014-10-01 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/exynos: fimd: remove unnecessary waiting vblank routine YoungJun Cho
2014-11-13 9:00 ` Inki Dae
2014-10-01 6:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/exynos: fimd: add fimd_channel_win() to clean up code YoungJun Cho
2014-11-13 9:05 ` Inki Dae
2014-10-01 6:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/exynos: fimd: modify vclk calculation for I80 i/f YoungJun Cho
2014-11-13 9:12 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-13 9:54 ` YoungJun Cho
2014-11-14 1:25 ` Inki Dae
2014-10-01 6:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/exynos: fimd: move handle vblank position in TE handler YoungJun Cho
2014-11-14 1:20 ` Inki Dae
2014-10-01 6:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/exynos: fimd: modify I80 i/f interrupt relevant routine YoungJun Cho
2014-11-14 1:36 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-16 0:53 ` YoungJun Cho
2014-10-01 6:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/exynos: dsi: move TE irq handler registration position YoungJun Cho
2014-11-14 1:49 ` Inki Dae [this message]
2014-11-14 2:08 ` YoungJun Cho
2014-10-01 6:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/exynos: dsi: move DSIM_STATE_ENABLED set position YoungJun Cho
2014-11-14 1:53 ` Inki Dae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54655FB8.9020505@samsung.com \
--to=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=yj44.cho@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox