* [PATCH] drm: Add DRM_NOTICE_IF
@ 2015-07-28 13:14 Chris Wilson
2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2015-07-28 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel; +Cc: intel-gfx
Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
interesting events without alarming the user or bug reporting tools.
For an example I have changed a DRM_ERROR for being unable to set a
performance enhancement in i915.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 5 ++---
include/drm/drmP.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 184d5f2dce21..f62cd78f8691 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1902,13 +1902,12 @@ static int gen8_init_rcs_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = intel_rcs_context_init_mocs(req);
/*
* Failing to program the MOCS is non-fatal.The system will not
* run at peak performance. So generate an error and carry on.
*/
- if (ret)
- DRM_ERROR("MOCS failed to program: expect performance issues.\n");
+ DRM_NOTICE_IF(intel_rcs_context_init_mocs(req),
+ "MOCS failed to program: expect performance issues.\n");
return intel_lr_context_render_state_init(req);
}
diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h
index b76af322d812..f2d68d185274 100644
--- a/include/drm/drmP.h
+++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
@@ -181,6 +181,26 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
})
/**
+ * Mild warning on assertion-esque failure.
+ *
+ * \param cond condition on which to *fail*
+ * \param fmt printf() like format string.
+ * \param arg arguments
+ *
+ * This is similar to WARN_ON but only prints a NOTICE rather than a warning
+ * and the whole stacktrace. It is only intended for mild issues which
+ * while significant do not critically impact the user (such as a performance
+ * issue).
+ */
+#define DRM_NOTICE_IF(cond, fmt, ...) ({ \
+ bool __cond = !!(cond); \
+ if (unlikely(__cond)) \
+ printk(KERN_NOTICE "[" DRM_NAME ":%s] " fmt, \
+ __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+ unlikely(__cond); \
+})
+
+/**
* Rate limited error output. Like DRM_ERROR() but won't flood the log.
*
* \param fmt printf() like format string.
--
2.4.6
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm: Add DRM_NOTICE_IF
2015-07-28 13:14 [PATCH] drm: Add DRM_NOTICE_IF Chris Wilson
@ 2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Emil Velikov @ 2015-07-28 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, dri-devel; +Cc: intel-gfx, emil.l.velikov
On 28/07/15 14:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
> KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
> interesting events without alarming the user or bug reporting tools.
>
Wouldn't it be better to opt for DRM_NOTICE_ON to be consistent with the
other two ? It sounds fine here, although I am a non-native English
speaker, so take it with a grain of salt.
Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm: Add DRM_NOTICE_IF
2015-07-28 13:14 [PATCH] drm: Add DRM_NOTICE_IF Chris Wilson
2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
@ 2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Emil Velikov @ 2015-07-28 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, dri-devel; +Cc: intel-gfx, emil.l.velikov
On 28/07/15 14:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Styled after WARN_ON/DRM_ERROR_ON, this prints a mild warning message (a
> KERN_NOTICE for significant but mild events) that allows us to insert
> interesting events without alarming the user or bug reporting tools.
>
Wouldn't it be better to opt for DRM_NOTICE_ON to be consistent with the
other two ? It sounds fine here, although I am a non-native English
speaker, so take it with a grain of salt.
Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-28 20:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-28 13:14 [PATCH] drm: Add DRM_NOTICE_IF Chris Wilson
2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
2015-07-28 20:50 ` Emil Velikov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox