From: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
To: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com"
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"christian.koenig@amd.com" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/ttm: Clarify that the TTM_PL_SYSTEM is under TTMs control
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:44:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61aa563096a20dca80b4cc48037998b932c2e4fc.camel@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110145034.487512-1-zackr@vmware.com>
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 09:50 -0500, Zack Rusin wrote:
> TTM takes full control over TTM_PL_SYSTEM placed buffers. This makes
> driver internal usage of TTM_PL_SYSTEM prone to errors because it
> requires the drivers to manually handle all interactions between TTM
> which can swap out those buffers whenever it thinks it's the right
> thing to do and driver.
>
> CPU buffers which need to be fenced and shared with accelerators
> should
> be placed in driver specific placements that can explicitly handle
> CPU/accelerator buffer fencing.
> Currently, apart, from things silently failing nothing is enforcing
> that requirement which means that it's easy for drivers and new
> developers to get this wrong. To avoid the confusion we can document
> this requirement and clarify the solution.
>
> This came up during a discussion on dri-devel:
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/232f45e9-8748-1243-09bf-56763e6668b3@amd.com
Polite and gentle ping on that one. Are we ok with the wording here?
z
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 19:38 [PATCH v2 0/6] Support module unload and hotunplug Zack Rusin
2021-11-05 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/vmwgfx: Remove the deprecated lower mem limit Zack Rusin
2021-11-05 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/vmwgfx: Release ttm memory if probe fails Zack Rusin
2021-11-05 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/vmwgfx: Fail to initialize on broken configs Zack Rusin
2021-11-05 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/vmwgfx: Introduce a new placement for MOB page tables Zack Rusin
2021-11-05 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/vmwgfx: Switch the internal BO's to ttm_bo_type_kernel Zack Rusin
2021-11-05 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/ttm: Clarify that the TTM_PL_SYSTEM buffers need to stay idle Zack Rusin
2021-11-08 11:07 ` Christian König
2021-11-08 15:42 ` [PATCH v3] " Zack Rusin
2021-11-10 14:50 ` [PATCH v4] drm/ttm: Clarify that the TTM_PL_SYSTEM is under TTMs control Zack Rusin
2021-11-11 16:44 ` Zack Rusin [this message]
2021-11-13 11:26 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-16 7:19 ` Christian König
2021-11-16 7:43 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-16 8:20 ` Christian König
2021-11-16 8:33 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-16 8:54 ` Christian König
2021-11-16 9:00 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-16 9:09 ` Christian König
2021-11-16 15:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-11-16 15:53 ` Zack Rusin
2021-11-22 14:15 ` Christian König
2021-11-22 15:05 ` Zack Rusin
2021-11-24 8:22 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61aa563096a20dca80b4cc48037998b932c2e4fc.camel@vmware.com \
--to=zackr@vmware.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox