* [PATCH 3/6] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.
[not found] <20180511195145.3829-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
@ 2018-05-11 19:51 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-24 14:00 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan @ 2018-05-11 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan, stable, Ville Syrjälä,
Jose Roberto de Souza, dri-devel
Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not aware of
any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in enabling
PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported by the
hardware.
I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and 1.4a.
Fixes: 6608804b3d7f ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 36c7609a4bd5..a7ba602a43a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8 psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
static const u16 psr_setup_time_us[] = {
PSR_SETUP_TIME(330),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(275),
+ PSR_SETUP_TIME(220),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(165),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(110),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(55),
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.
2018-05-11 19:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table Dhinakaran Pandiyan
@ 2018-05-24 14:00 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-05-24 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza, dri-devel, Dhinakaran Pandiyan, stable,
Sean Paul
On Fri, 11 May 2018, Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> wrote:
> Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not aware of
> any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in enabling
> PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported by the
> hardware.
>
> I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and 1.4a.
>
> Fixes: 6608804b3d7f ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Pushed to drm-misc-fixes with reviews picked up from the earlier posting
[1]. Doesn't look like the function is used by anyone other than i915,
so I didn't bother with further acks from non-Intel devs. Should be a
straightforward fix anyway.
BR,
Jani.
[1] http://mid.mail-archive.com/20180511005419.11199-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 36c7609a4bd5..a7ba602a43a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8 psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> static const u16 psr_setup_time_us[] = {
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(330),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(275),
> + PSR_SETUP_TIME(220),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(165),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(110),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(55),
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-24 14:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20180511195145.3829-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-05-11 19:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-24 14:00 ` Jani Nikula
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox