From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: vc4: set permissions for ioctls
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:53:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bn33vkb1.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvgo53BZmJb5Cs6M5mem+xgDG=BP6h+_Dr75H-0PrTvJsJkAg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2052 bytes --]
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> writes:
> On 10 June 2016 at 21:08, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
>> Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 10 June 2016 at 00:42, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
>>>> Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Ioctls generally have DRM_AUTH and DRM_RENDER_ALLOW set to restrict them
>>>>> to authorized clients and render nodes. Without this, access from render
>>>>> nodes fails.
>>>>
>>>> We've already got a fix to add RENDER_ALLOW submitted in the latest
>>>> drm-vc4-fixes. There's no reason to require auth on this
>>>> implementation, though.
>>>>
>>> Not 100% sure but I think you do. At least every other driver does...
>>>
>>> Why: I'm thinking that without DRM_AUTH one will be able to open the
>>> card# node and issue the said IOCTLs even if the client is not
>>> authenticated. Which, obviously isn't a huge deal, but doesn't sound
>>> right.
>>>
>>> Then again, my knowledge of vc4 is virtually non-existent, so there
>>> might be something special happening here ?
>>
>> Let's flip this around: What is the problem you see with calling any of
>> the ioctls without having gone through the auth dance? I don't believe
>> there's any reason to require auth, since you only have access to the
>> buffers you create or import.
>>
>> Basically, auth was created a stopgap solution for "but if anyone had
>> access to the DRM device, they could scrape the X frontbuffer!"
>
> Personally I don't see any serious issues* with keeping DRM_AUTH out
> of these. Although one could argue that the lack of it up-to recently
> one was using non-auth access to the card node. The latter of which
> lead to the DRM_RENDER_ALLOW going unnoticed.
>
> That aside, I would urge that we have consistency on the topic.
> Whether adding DRM_AUTH to the said VC4 ioctls, dropping DRM_AUTH
> everywhere (if DRM_RENDER_ALLOW is present on the said ioclt) or
> something else.
DRM_AUTH is not safe to remove from other drivers, unless they enforce
access control to their buffers.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-09 21:19 [PATCH 1/2] drm: vc4: set permissions for ioctls Rob Herring
2016-06-09 21:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm: vc4: enable XBGR8888 and ABGR8888 pixel formats Rob Herring
2016-06-10 0:22 ` Eric Anholt
2016-07-08 1:47 ` Eric Anholt
2016-06-09 23:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: vc4: set permissions for ioctls Emil Velikov
2016-06-09 23:42 ` Eric Anholt
2016-06-09 23:50 ` Emil Velikov
2016-06-10 20:08 ` Eric Anholt
2016-06-14 12:31 ` Emil Velikov
2016-06-14 15:53 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bn33vkb1.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox