From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, faith@gfxstrand.net,
luben.tuikov@amd.com, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v3] drm/sched: implement dynamic job-flow control
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:44:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98988459-25a8-4ee0-89d4-cb816cbc5bef@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231027093943.3f0ae992@collabora.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2129 bytes --]
Am 27.10.23 um 09:39 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:35:01 +0200
> Christian König<christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> Am 27.10.23 um 09:32 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
>>> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:22:12 +0200
>>> Christian König<christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @update_job_credits: Called once the scheduler is considering this
>>>>> + * job for execution.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Drivers may use this to update the job's submission credits, which is
>>>>> + * useful to e.g. deduct the number of native fences which have been
>>>>> + * signaled meanwhile.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * The callback must either return the new number of submission credits
>>>>> + * for the given job, or zero if no update is required.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This callback is optional.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + u32 (*update_job_credits)(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job);
>>>> Why do we need an extra callback for this?
>>>>
>>>> Just document that prepare_job() is allowed to reduce the number of
>>>> credits the job might need.
>>> ->prepare_job() is called only once if the returned fence is NULL, but
>>> we need this credit-update to happen every time a job is considered for
>>> execution by the scheduler.
>> But the job is only considered for execution once. How do you see that
>> this is called multiple times?
> Nope, it's not. If drm_sched_can_queue() returns false, the scheduler
> will go look for another entity that has a job ready for execution, and
> get back to this entity later, and test drm_sched_can_queue() again.
> Basically, any time drm_sched_can_queue() is called, the job credits
> update should happen, so we have an accurate view of how many credits
> this job needs.
Well, that is the handling which I already rejected because it creates
unfairness between processes. When you consider the credits needed
*before* scheduling jobs with a lower credit count are always preferred
over jobs with a higher credit count.
What you can do is to look at the credits of a job *after* it was picked
up for scheduling so that you can scheduler more jobs.
Regards,
Christian.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3114 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-27 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 16:13 [PATCH drm-misc-next v3] drm/sched: implement dynamic job-flow control Danilo Krummrich
2023-10-26 21:13 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-27 1:03 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-27 7:17 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <794f9b45-db0d-4261-aefe-7da2ad0ed3b7@redhat.com>
2023-10-27 16:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-28 3:34 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-27 7:22 ` Christian König
2023-10-27 7:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-27 7:35 ` Christian König
2023-10-27 7:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-27 7:44 ` Christian König [this message]
2023-10-27 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-27 9:06 ` Christian König
2023-10-27 10:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-30 7:38 ` Christian König
2023-10-30 17:56 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-10-31 13:20 ` Christian König
2023-10-31 15:01 ` Danilo Krummrich
[not found] ` <8d4a0870-f7d0-41ee-aa25-6488b6ea037a@amd.com>
[not found] ` <ZUPkfKzgKqhqQhMI@pollux>
[not found] ` <c91cf097-2ed3-4669-b9ae-b16b5f875b02@amd.com>
2023-11-06 16:46 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-07 9:13 ` Christian König
2023-11-07 13:03 ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-10-27 8:25 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <8e117f9f-a01c-4242-8781-b2ed4969513b@redhat.com>
2023-10-27 16:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-28 3:37 ` Luben Tuikov
[not found] ` <a9215c37-61cd-4fbc-9f80-217daacd96bd@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20231027184143.4427edb8@collabora.com>
2023-10-28 3:51 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98988459-25a8-4ee0-89d4-cb816cbc5bef@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith@gfxstrand.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox