dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: matthew.brost@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, faith@gfxstrand.net,
	luben.tuikov@amd.com, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v3] drm/sched: implement dynamic job-flow control
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:44:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98988459-25a8-4ee0-89d4-cb816cbc5bef@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231027093943.3f0ae992@collabora.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2129 bytes --]

Am 27.10.23 um 09:39 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:35:01 +0200
> Christian König<christian.koenig@amd.com>  wrote:
>
>> Am 27.10.23 um 09:32 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
>>> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:22:12 +0200
>>> Christian König<christian.koenig@amd.com>  wrote:
>>>   
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/**
>>>>> +	 * @update_job_credits: Called once the scheduler is considering this
>>>>> +	 * job for execution.
>>>>> +	 *
>>>>> +	 * Drivers may use this to update the job's submission credits, which is
>>>>> +	 * useful to e.g. deduct the number of native fences which have been
>>>>> +	 * signaled meanwhile.
>>>>> +	 *
>>>>> +	 * The callback must either return the new number of submission credits
>>>>> +	 * for the given job, or zero if no update is required.
>>>>> +	 *
>>>>> +	 * This callback is optional.
>>>>> +	 */
>>>>> +	u32 (*update_job_credits)(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job);
>>>> Why do we need an extra callback for this?
>>>>
>>>> Just document that prepare_job() is allowed to reduce the number of
>>>> credits the job might need.
>>> ->prepare_job() is called only once if the returned fence is NULL, but
>>> we need this credit-update to happen every time a job is considered for
>>> execution by the scheduler.
>> But the job is only considered for execution once. How do you see that
>> this is called multiple times?
> Nope, it's not. If drm_sched_can_queue() returns false, the scheduler
> will go look for another entity that has a job ready for execution, and
> get back to this entity later, and test drm_sched_can_queue() again.
> Basically, any time drm_sched_can_queue() is called, the job credits
> update should happen, so we have an accurate view of how many credits
> this job needs.

Well, that is the handling which I already rejected because it creates 
unfairness between processes. When you consider the credits needed 
*before* scheduling jobs with a lower credit count are always preferred 
over jobs with a higher credit count.
What you can do is to look at the credits of a job *after* it was picked 
up for scheduling so that you can scheduler more jobs.

Regards,
Christian.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3114 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-27  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-26 16:13 [PATCH drm-misc-next v3] drm/sched: implement dynamic job-flow control Danilo Krummrich
2023-10-26 21:13 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-27  1:03   ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-27  7:17 ` Boris Brezillon
     [not found]   ` <794f9b45-db0d-4261-aefe-7da2ad0ed3b7@redhat.com>
2023-10-27 16:26     ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-28  3:34       ` Luben Tuikov
2023-10-27  7:22 ` Christian König
2023-10-27  7:32   ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-27  7:35     ` Christian König
2023-10-27  7:39       ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-27  7:44         ` Christian König [this message]
2023-10-27  8:22           ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-27  9:06             ` Christian König
2023-10-27 10:17               ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-30  7:38                 ` Christian König
2023-10-30 17:56                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-10-31 13:20                     ` Christian König
2023-10-31 15:01                       ` Danilo Krummrich
     [not found]                         ` <8d4a0870-f7d0-41ee-aa25-6488b6ea037a@amd.com>
     [not found]                           ` <ZUPkfKzgKqhqQhMI@pollux>
     [not found]                             ` <c91cf097-2ed3-4669-b9ae-b16b5f875b02@amd.com>
2023-11-06 16:46                               ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-07  9:13                                 ` Christian König
2023-11-07 13:03                                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-10-27  8:25 ` Boris Brezillon
     [not found]   ` <8e117f9f-a01c-4242-8781-b2ed4969513b@redhat.com>
2023-10-27 16:31     ` Boris Brezillon
2023-10-28  3:37       ` Luben Tuikov
     [not found]   ` <a9215c37-61cd-4fbc-9f80-217daacd96bd@gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20231027184143.4427edb8@collabora.com>
2023-10-28  3:51       ` Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98988459-25a8-4ee0-89d4-cb816cbc5bef@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=faith@gfxstrand.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox