* [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
@ 2023-01-10 15:24 Jiasheng Jiang
2023-01-11 22:46 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiasheng Jiang @ 2023-01-10 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: maarten.lankhorst, mripard, tzimmermann, airlied, daniel
Cc: Jiasheng Jiang, linux-kernel, dri-devel
Add drmm_alloc_workqueue() and drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(), the helpers
that provide managed workqueue cleanup. The workqueue will be destroyed
with the final reference of the DRM device.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_managed.h | 8 +++++
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
index 4cf214de50c4..d3bd6247eec9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
@@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ static void drmm_mutex_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
mutex_destroy(lock);
}
+static void drmm_destroy_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = res;
+
+ destroy_workqueue(wq);
+}
+
/**
* drmm_mutex_init - &drm_device-managed mutex_init()
* @dev: DRM device
@@ -289,3 +296,62 @@ int drmm_mutex_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_mutex_release, lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_mutex_init);
+
+/**
+ * drmm_alloc_workqueue - &drm_device-managed alloc_workqueue()
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 on success, or a negative errno code otherwise.
+ *
+ * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_workqueue().
+ * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
+ * drm_dev_put().
+ */
+int drmm_alloc_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq, const char *fmt,
+ unsigned int flags, int max_active, ...)
+{
+ va_list args;
+
+ va_start(args, max_active);
+ wq = alloc_workqueue(fmt, flags, max_active, args);
+ va_end(args);
+
+ if (!wq)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_destroy_workqueue, wq);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_alloc_workqueue);
+
+/**
+ * drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue - &drm_device-managed
+ * alloc_ordered_workqueue()
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 on success, or a negative errno code otherwise.
+ *
+ * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_ordered_workqueue().
+ * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
+ * drm_dev_put().
+ */
+int drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, ...)
+{
+ va_list args;
+
+ va_start(args, flags);
+ wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(fmt, flags, args);
+ va_end(args);
+
+ if (!wq)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_destroy_workqueue, wq);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue);
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_managed.h b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
index 359883942612..68cecc14e1af 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
@@ -107,4 +107,12 @@ void drmm_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *data);
int drmm_mutex_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct mutex *lock);
+int drmm_alloc_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq, const char *fmt,
+ unsigned int flags, int max_active, ...);
+
+int drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, ...);
+
#endif
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
2023-01-10 15:24 [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue() Jiasheng Jiang
@ 2023-01-11 22:46 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2023-01-11 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiasheng Jiang; +Cc: tzimmermann, linux-kernel, dri-devel
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:24:47PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add drmm_alloc_workqueue() and drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(), the helpers
> that provide managed workqueue cleanup. The workqueue will be destroyed
> with the final reference of the DRM device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Yeah I think this looks nice.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I'm assuming driver maintainers will pick this up, if not please holler.
Also the threading seems broken, it's not a patch series. The b4 tool or
git send-email (of all the patches of the entire series at once, not each
individually) should get this right.
Unfortunately I did't find the right link in the kernel docs, or at least
they're not as detailed as I hoped.
Also your previous submission had iirc a bunch more patches, do you plan
to include them all in the next patch set?
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/drm_managed.h | 8 +++++
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> index 4cf214de50c4..d3bd6247eec9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ static void drmm_mutex_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
> mutex_destroy(lock);
> }
>
> +static void drmm_destroy_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
> +{
> + struct workqueue_struct *wq = res;
> +
> + destroy_workqueue(wq);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * drmm_mutex_init - &drm_device-managed mutex_init()
> * @dev: DRM device
> @@ -289,3 +296,62 @@ int drmm_mutex_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct mutex *lock)
> return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_mutex_release, lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_mutex_init);
> +
> +/**
> + * drmm_alloc_workqueue - &drm_device-managed alloc_workqueue()
> + * @dev: DRM device
> + * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success, or a negative errno code otherwise.
> + *
> + * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_workqueue().
> + * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
> + * drm_dev_put().
> + */
> +int drmm_alloc_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct workqueue_struct *wq, const char *fmt,
> + unsigned int flags, int max_active, ...)
> +{
> + va_list args;
> +
> + va_start(args, max_active);
> + wq = alloc_workqueue(fmt, flags, max_active, args);
> + va_end(args);
> +
> + if (!wq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_destroy_workqueue, wq);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_alloc_workqueue);
> +
> +/**
> + * drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue - &drm_device-managed
> + * alloc_ordered_workqueue()
> + * @dev: DRM device
> + * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success, or a negative errno code otherwise.
> + *
> + * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_ordered_workqueue().
> + * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
> + * drm_dev_put().
> + */
> +int drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> + const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, ...)
> +{
> + va_list args;
> +
> + va_start(args, flags);
> + wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(fmt, flags, args);
> + va_end(args);
> +
> + if (!wq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_destroy_workqueue, wq);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_managed.h b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> index 359883942612..68cecc14e1af 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
> @@ -107,4 +107,12 @@ void drmm_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *data);
>
> int drmm_mutex_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct mutex *lock);
>
> +int drmm_alloc_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct workqueue_struct *wq, const char *fmt,
> + unsigned int flags, int max_active, ...);
> +
> +int drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> + const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, ...);
> +
> #endif
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
@ 2023-01-18 3:24 Jiasheng Jiang
2023-11-14 16:03 ` Jeffrey Hugo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiasheng Jiang @ 2023-01-18 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daniel; +Cc: Jiasheng Jiang, linux-kernel, dri-devel, tzimmermann
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:24:47PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
>> Add drmm_alloc_workqueue() and drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(), the helpers
>> that provide managed workqueue cleanup. The workqueue will be destroyed
>> with the final reference of the DRM device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
>
> Yeah I think this looks nice.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> I'm assuming driver maintainers will pick this up, if not please holler.
>
> Also the threading seems broken, it's not a patch series. The b4 tool or
> git send-email (of all the patches of the entire series at once, not each
> individually) should get this right.
>
> Unfortunately I did't find the right link in the kernel docs, or at least
> they're not as detailed as I hoped.
>
> Also your previous submission had iirc a bunch more patches, do you plan
> to include them all in the next patch set?
I have found that some previous patches have already been applied.
Need I just convert alloc*workqueue into drmm_alloc*workqueue and remove
the destroy_workqueue?
Or need I convert all the alloc*workqueue in the DRM?
Thanks,
Jiang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
2023-01-18 3:24 Jiasheng Jiang
@ 2023-11-14 16:03 ` Jeffrey Hugo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Hugo @ 2023-11-14 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiasheng Jiang, daniel; +Cc: linux-kernel, dri-devel, mripard, tzimmermann
On 1/17/2023 8:24 PM, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:24:47PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
>>> Add drmm_alloc_workqueue() and drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(), the helpers
>>> that provide managed workqueue cleanup. The workqueue will be destroyed
>>> with the final reference of the DRM device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
>>
>> Yeah I think this looks nice.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>>
>> I'm assuming driver maintainers will pick this up, if not please holler.
>>
>> Also the threading seems broken, it's not a patch series. The b4 tool or
>> git send-email (of all the patches of the entire series at once, not each
>> individually) should get this right.
>>
>> Unfortunately I did't find the right link in the kernel docs, or at least
>> they're not as detailed as I hoped.
>>
>> Also your previous submission had iirc a bunch more patches, do you plan
>> to include them all in the next patch set?
>
> I have found that some previous patches have already been applied.
> Need I just convert alloc*workqueue into drmm_alloc*workqueue and remove
> the destroy_workqueue?
> Or need I convert all the alloc*workqueue in the DRM?
>
> Thanks,
> Jiang
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see that this ever got applied. I
have a use for this interface in the qaic driver.
Jiang, are you planning on posting a v2?
-Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] drm: Add DRM managed workqueues
@ 2024-03-15 14:50 Jeffrey Hugo
2024-03-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue() Jeffrey Hugo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Hugo @ 2024-03-15 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daniel, jiasheng, quic_carlv, quic_pkanojiy, stanislaw.gruszka,
jacek.lawrynowicz
Cc: linux-arm-msm, dri-devel, ogabbay, Jeffrey Hugo
Based on work at https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230118032413.6496-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn/
The API in the origional work seemed to have two issues:
1. The output parameter was not correctly defined
2. The allocating functions did not return the allocated object like the
other drmm functions
I tweaked the implementation to address both of these.
From what I can tell, the i915 change no longer applies to the code
base, likely due to refactoring from merging xe. I dropped it.
Jeffrey Hugo (1):
accel/qaic: Use drmm_alloc_workqueue()
Jiasheng Jiang (1):
drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_drv.c | 30 ++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_managed.h | 8 ++++
3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
2024-03-15 14:50 [PATCH 0/2] drm: Add DRM managed workqueues Jeffrey Hugo
@ 2024-03-15 14:50 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2024-03-15 20:51 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Hugo @ 2024-03-15 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daniel, jiasheng, quic_carlv, quic_pkanojiy, stanislaw.gruszka,
jacek.lawrynowicz
Cc: linux-arm-msm, dri-devel, ogabbay, Daniel Vetter, Jeffrey Hugo
From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Add drmm_alloc_workqueue() and drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(), the helpers
that provide managed workqueue cleanup. The workqueue will be destroyed
with the final reference of the DRM device.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
[jhugo: fix API to return the alloc'd workqueue]
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_managed.h | 8 ++++
2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
index 7646f67bda4e..d5135a471ff2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
@@ -310,3 +310,85 @@ void __drmm_mutex_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
mutex_destroy(lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drmm_mutex_release);
+
+static void drmm_destroy_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev, void *res)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = res;
+
+ destroy_workqueue(wq);
+}
+
+/**
+ * drmm_alloc_workqueue - &drm_device-managed alloc_workqueue()
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * Valid pointer on success, NULL on error.
+ *
+ * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_workqueue().
+ * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
+ * drm_dev_put().
+ */
+struct workqueue_struct *drmm_alloc_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ const char *fmt, unsigned int flags,
+ int max_active, ...)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq;
+ va_list args;
+ int ret;
+
+ va_start(args, max_active);
+ wq = alloc_workqueue(fmt, flags, max_active, args);
+ va_end(args);
+
+ if (!wq)
+ return NULL;
+
+ ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_destroy_workqueue, wq);
+ if (ret) {
+ destroy_workqueue(wq);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return wq;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_alloc_workqueue);
+
+/**
+ * drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue - &drm_device-managed
+ * alloc_ordered_workqueue()
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * Valid pointer on success, NULL on error.
+ *
+ * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_ordered_workqueue().
+ * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
+ * drm_dev_put().
+ */
+struct workqueue_struct *drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ const char *fmt,
+ unsigned int flags, ...)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq;
+ va_list args;
+ int ret;
+
+ va_start(args, flags);
+ wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(fmt, flags, args);
+ va_end(args);
+
+ if (!wq)
+ return NULL;
+
+ ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_destroy_workqueue, wq);
+ if (ret) {
+ destroy_workqueue(wq);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return wq;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue);
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_managed.h b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
index f547b09ca023..cb42fb252648 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h
@@ -127,4 +127,12 @@ void __drmm_mutex_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *res);
drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, __drmm_mutex_release, lock); \
}) \
+struct workqueue_struct *drmm_alloc_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ const char *fmt, unsigned int flags,
+ int max_active, ...);
+
+struct workqueue_struct *drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
+ const char *fmt,
+ unsigned int flags, ...);
+
#endif
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
2024-03-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue() Jeffrey Hugo
@ 2024-03-15 20:51 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-03-15 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeffrey Hugo, daniel, jiasheng, quic_carlv, quic_pkanojiy,
stanislaw.gruszka, jacek.lawrynowicz
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-arm-msm, dri-devel, ogabbay, Daniel Vetter,
Jeffrey Hugo
Hi Jeffrey,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.8 next-20240315]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jeffrey-Hugo/drm-Add-DRM-managed-alloc_workqueue-and-alloc_ordered_workqueue/20240315-225330
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240315145034.3972749-2-quic_jhugo%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue()
config: parisc-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240316/202403160449.IaCY0Cl5-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240316/202403160449.IaCY0Cl5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403160449.IaCY0Cl5-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c:336: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'fmt' not described in 'drmm_alloc_workqueue'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c:336: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'flags' not described in 'drmm_alloc_workqueue'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c:336: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'max_active' not described in 'drmm_alloc_workqueue'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c:336: warning: Excess function parameter 'wq' description in 'drmm_alloc_workqueue'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c:374: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'fmt' not described in 'drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c:374: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'flags' not described in 'drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c:374: warning: Excess function parameter 'wq' description in 'drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue'
vim +336 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c
320
321 /**
322 * drmm_alloc_workqueue - &drm_device-managed alloc_workqueue()
323 * @dev: DRM device
324 * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
325 *
326 * Returns:
327 * Valid pointer on success, NULL on error.
328 *
329 * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_workqueue().
330 * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
331 * drm_dev_put().
332 */
333 struct workqueue_struct *drmm_alloc_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
334 const char *fmt, unsigned int flags,
335 int max_active, ...)
> 336 {
337 struct workqueue_struct *wq;
338 va_list args;
339 int ret;
340
341 va_start(args, max_active);
342 wq = alloc_workqueue(fmt, flags, max_active, args);
343 va_end(args);
344
345 if (!wq)
346 return NULL;
347
348 ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drmm_destroy_workqueue, wq);
349 if (ret) {
350 destroy_workqueue(wq);
351 return NULL;
352 }
353
354 return wq;
355 }
356 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_alloc_workqueue);
357
358 /**
359 * drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue - &drm_device-managed
360 * alloc_ordered_workqueue()
361 * @dev: DRM device
362 * @wq: workqueue to be allocated
363 *
364 * Returns:
365 * Valid pointer on success, NULL on error.
366 *
367 * This is a &drm_device-managed version of alloc_ordered_workqueue().
368 * The initialized lock is automatically destroyed on the final
369 * drm_dev_put().
370 */
371 struct workqueue_struct *drmm_alloc_ordered_workqueue(struct drm_device *dev,
372 const char *fmt,
373 unsigned int flags, ...)
> 374 {
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-15 20:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-10 15:24 [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue() Jiasheng Jiang
2023-01-11 22:46 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-18 3:24 Jiasheng Jiang
2023-11-14 16:03 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2024-03-15 14:50 [PATCH 0/2] drm: Add DRM managed workqueues Jeffrey Hugo
2024-03-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add DRM-managed alloc_workqueue() and alloc_ordered_workqueue() Jeffrey Hugo
2024-03-15 20:51 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox