From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jake S <j@metarealtyinc.ca>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: allow eDP VRR when EDID has adaptive sync range
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:16:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad_kEgDZiDIPy1Cs@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69dfe22f.050a0220.301b30.5755@mx.google.com>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 07:08:30PM +0000, Jake S wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> > AFAICS the Windows driver does respect that VBT bit. So we should too.
>
> That's fair -- I don't have visibility into the Windows driver
> internals so I can't say definitively whether it checks VBT or not.
>
> What I can confirm is the end-user result: on this Dell XPS 2026
> (Panther Lake), VRR 20-120Hz works on Windows but not on Linux with
> the same firmware. The VBT does not contain a VRR flag for this panel
> at all -- intel_vbt_decode shows no VRR-related fields in the child
> device block.
It's in the LFP power block (44).
>
> So either Windows has a fallback path when VBT doesn't declare VRR,
> or Dell's Intel DCH driver ships with a driver-side override.
My cursory glance didn't spot any registry key stuff in there
either. That I think is the usual "screw proper design and just
hack it" approach for the Windows driver.
> Either
> way, the panel clearly supports VRR (the EDID's DisplayID extension
> explicitly declares Adaptive Sync 20-120Hz), and it works in practice
> on this hardware.
>
> Framework laptop users have reported the same class of issue with
> their BOE panels.
>
> If respecting VBT is important (and I understand the reasoning --
> OEM validation), would something like a quirk table or a module
> parameter be an acceptable alternative? I'd rather have any path to
> making this work than no path.
One can always hack up the VBT and use the firmware loader
to override it.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260415130626.10523-1-j@metarealtyinc.ca>
[not found] ` <20260415130626.10523-3-j@metarealtyinc.ca>
2026-04-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: allow eDP VRR when EDID has adaptive sync range Ville Syrjälä
[not found] ` <69dfe22f.050a0220.301b30.5755@mx.google.com>
2026-04-15 19:16 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-04-15 14:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] drm: Enable eDP VRR for panels with DisplayID Adaptive Sync Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad_kEgDZiDIPy1Cs@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=j@metarealtyinc.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox