dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Felix.Kuehling@amd.com,
	"Honglei Huang" <honglei1.huang@amd.com>,
	Oak.Zeng@amd.com, Jenny-Jing.Liu@amd.com, Philip.Yang@amd.com,
	Xiaogang.Chen@amd.com, Ray.Huang@amd.com, Lingshan.Zhu@amd.com,
	Junhua.Shen@amd.com, "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/POC PATCH 00/12] POC SVM implementation in AMDGPU based on drm_gpusvm
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:59:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae5fe946-4756-43b4-848f-3b545ac61ba7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e21e8e1a-4d2e-40e9-bbb7-2764cf33e760@amd.com>



On 3/17/26 19:48, Christian König wrote:
> Adding a few XE and drm_gpuvm people on TO.
> 
> On 3/17/26 12:29, Honglei Huang wrote:
>> From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
>>
>> This is a POC/draft patch series of SVM feature in amdgpu based on the
>> drm_gpusvm framework. The primary purpose of this RFC is to validate
>> the framework's applicability, identify implementation challenges,
>> and start discussion on framework evolution. This is not a production
>> ready submission.
>>
>> This patch series implements basic SVM support with the following features:
>>
>>    1. attributes sepatarated from physical page management:
>>
>>      - Attribute layer (amdgpu_svm_attr_tree): a driver side interval
>>        tree that stores SVM attributes. Managed through the SET_ATTR,
>>        and mmu notifier callback.
>>
>>      - Physical page layer (drm_gpusvm ranges): managed by the
>>        drm_gpusvm framework, representing actual HMM backed DMA
>>        mappings and GPU page table entries.
>>
>>       This separation is necessary:
>>         -  The framework does not support range splitting, so a partial
>>            munmap destroys the entire overlapping range, including the
>>            still valid parts. If attributes were stored inside drm_gpusvm
>>            ranges, they would be lost on unmapping.
>>            The separate attr tree preserves userspace set attributes
>>            across range operations.
> 
> Isn't that actually intended? When parts of the range unmap then that usually means the whole range isn't valid any more.


It is about partial unmap, some subregion in drm_gpusvm_range is still 
valid but some other subregion is invalid, but under drm_gpusvm, need to 
destroy the entire range.

e.g.:

           [---------------unmap region in mmu notifier-----------------]
[0x1000 ------------ 0x9000]
[  valid ][     invalid    ]

see deatil in drm_gpusvm.c:110 line
section:Partial Unmapping of Ranges


> 
>>
>>         -  drm_gpusvm range boundaries are determined by fault address
>>            and pre setted chunk size, not by userspace attribute boundaries.
>>            Ranges  may be rechunked on memory changes. Embedding
>>            attributes in framework ranges would scatter attr state
>>            across many small ranges and require complex reassemble
>>            logic when operate attrbute.
> 
> Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
> 
>>
>>    2) System memory mapping via drm_gpusvm
>>
>>       The core mapping path uses drm_gpusvm_range_find_or_insert() to
>>       create ranges, drm_gpusvm_range_get_pages() for HMM page fault
>>       and DMA mapping, then updates GPU page tables via
>>       amdgpu_vm_update_range().
>>
>>    3) IOCTL driven mapping (XNACK off / no GPU fault mode)
>>
>>       On XNACK off hardware the GPU cannot recover from page faults,
>>       so mappings must be established through ioctl. When
>>       userspace calls SET_ATTR with ACCESS=ENABLE, the driver
>>       walks the attr tree and maps all accessible intervals
>>       to the GPU by amdgpu_svm_range_map_attr_ranges().
>>
>>    4) Invalidation, GC worker, and restore worker
>>
>>       MMU notifier callbacks (amdgpu_svm_range_invalidate) handle
>>       three cases based on event type and hardware mode:
>>         - unmap event: clear GPU PTEs in the notifier context,
>>           unmap DMA pages, mark ranges as unmapped, flush TLB,
>>           and enqueue to the GC worker. On XNACK off, also
>>           quiesce KFD queues and schedule rebuild of the
>>           still valid portions that were destroyed together with
>>           the unmapped subregion.
>>
>>         - evict on XNACK off:
>>           quiesce KFD queues first, then unmap DMA pages and
>>           enqueue to the restore worker.
> 
> Is that done through the DMA fence or by talking directly to the MES/HWS?

Currently KFD queues quiesce/resume API are reused, lookig forward to a 
better solution.

Regards,
Honglei

> 
> Thanks,
> Christian.
> 
>>
>>         - evict on XNACK on:
>>           clear GPU PTEs, unmap DMA pages, and flush TLB, but do
>>           not schedule any worker. The GPU will fault on next
>>           access and the fault handler establishes the mapping.
>>
>> Not supported feature:
>>    - XNACK on GPU page fault mode
>>    - migration and prefetch feature
>>    - Multi GPU support
>>
>>    XNACK on enablement is ongoing.The GPUs that support XNACK on
>>    are currently only accessible to us via remote lab machines, which slows
>>    down progress.
>>
>> Patch overview:
>>
>>    01/12 UAPI definitions: DRM_AMDGPU_GEM_SVM ioctl, SVM flags,
>>          SET_ATTR/GET_ATTR operations, attribute types, and related
>>          structs in amdgpu_drm.h.
>>
>>    02/12 Core data structures: amdgpu_svm wrapping drm_gpusvm with
>>          refcount, attr_tree, workqueues, locks, and
>>          callbacks (begin/end_restore, flush_tlb).
>>
>>    03/12 Attribute data structures: amdgpu_svm_attrs, attr_range
>>          (interval tree node), attr_tree, access enum, flag masks,
>>          and change trigger enum.
>>
>>    04/12 Attribute tree operations: interval tree lookup, insert,
>>          remove, and tree create/destroy lifecycle.
>>
>>    05/12 Attribute set: validate UAPI attributes, apply to internal
>>          attrs, handle hole/existing range with head/tail splitting,
>>          compute change triggers, and -EAGAIN retry loop.
>>          Implements attr_clear_pages for unmap cleanup and attr_get.
>>
>>    06/12 Range data structures: amdgpu_svm_range extending
>>          drm_gpusvm_range with gpu_mapped state, pending ops,
>>          pte_flags cache, and GC/restore queue linkage.
>>
>>    07/12 PTE flags and GPU mapping: simple gpu pte function,
>>          GPU page table update with DMA address, range mapping loop:
>>          find_or_insert -> get_pages -> validate -> update PTE,
>>          and attribute change driven mapping function.
>>
>>    08/12 Notifier and invalidation: synchronous GPU PTE clear in
>>          notifier context, range removal and overlap cleanup,
>>          rebuild after destroy logic, and MMU event dispatcher
>>
>>    09/12 Workers: KFD queue quiesce/resume via kgd2kfd APIs, GC
>>          worker for unmap processing and rebuild, ordered restore
>>          worker for mapping evicted ranges, and flush/sync
>>          helpers.
>>
>>    10/12 Initialization and fini: kmem_cache for range/attr,
>>          drm_gpusvm_init with chunk sizes, XNACK detection, TLB
>>          flush helper, and amdgpu_svm init/close/fini lifecycle.
>>
>>    11/12 IOCTL and fault handler: PASID based SVM lookup with kref
>>          protection, amdgpu_gem_svm_ioctl dispatcher, and
>>          amdgpu_svm_handle_fault for GPU page fault recovery.
>>
>>    12/12 Build integration: Kconfig option (CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_SVM),
>>          Makefile rules, ioctl table registration, and amdgpu_vm
>>          hooks (init in make_compute, close/fini, fault dispatch).
>>
>> Test result:
>>    on gfx1100(W7900) and gfx943(MI300x)
>>    kfd test: 95%+ passed, same failed cases with offical relase
>>    rocr test: all passed
>>    hip catch test: 20 cases failed in all 5366 cases, +13 failures vs offical relase
>>
>> During implementation we identified several challenges / design questions:
>>
>> 1. No range splitting on partial unmap
>>
>>    drm_gpusvm explicitly does not support range splitting in drm_gpusvm.c:122.
>>    Partial munmap needs to destroy the entire range including the valid interval.
>>    GPU fault driven hardware can handle this design by extra gpu fault handle,
>>    but AMDGPU needs to support XNACK off hardware, this design requires driver
>>    rebuild the valid part in the removed entire range. Whichs bring a very heavy
>>    restore work in work queue/GC worker: unmap/destroy -> rebuild(insert and map)
>>    this restore work even heavier than kfd_svm. In previous driver work queue
>>    only needs to restore or unmap, but in drm_gpusvm driver needs to unmap and restore.
>>    which brings about more complex logic, heavier worker queue workload, and
>>    synchronization issues.
>>
>> 2. Fault driven vs ioctl driven mapping
>>
>>    drm_gpusvm is designed around GPU page fault handlers. The primary entry
>>    point drm_gpusvm_range_find_or_insert() takes a fault_addr.
>>    AMDGPU needs to support IOCTL driven mapping cause No XNACK hardware that
>>    GPU cannot fault at all
>>
>>    The ioctl path cannot hold mmap_read_lock across the entire operation
>>    because drm_gpusvm_range_find_or_insert() acquires/releases it
>>    internally. This creates race windows with MMU notifiers / workers.
>>
>> 3. Multi GPU support
>>
>> drm_gpusvm binds one drm_device to one instance. In multi GPU systems,
>> each GPU gets an independent instance with its own range tree, MMU
>> notifiers, notifier_lock, and DMA mappings.
>>
>> This may brings huge overhead:
>>      - N x MMU notifier registrations for the same address range
>>      - N x hmm_range_fault() calls for the same page (KFD: 1x)
>>      - N x DMA mapping memory
>>      - N x invalidation + restore worker scheduling per CPU unmap event
>>      - N x GPU page table flush / TLB invalidation
>>      - Increased mmap_lock hold time, N callbacks serialize under it
>>
>> compatibility issues:
>>      - Quiesce/resume scope mismatch: to integrate with KFD compute
>>        queues, the driver reuses kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm()/resume_mm()
>>        which have process level semantics. Under the per GPU
>>        drm_gpusvm model, maybe there are some issues on sync. To properly
>>        integrate with KFD under the per SVM model, a compatibility or
>>        new per VM level queue control APIs maybe need to introduced.
>>
>> Migration challenges:
>>
>>    - No global migration decision logic: each per GPU SVM
>>      instance maintains its own attribute tree independently. This
>>      allows conflicting settings (e.g., GPU0's SVM sets
>>      PREFERRED_LOC=GPU0 while GPU1's SVM sets PREFERRED_LOC=GPU1
>>      for the same address range) with no detection or resolution.
>>      A global attribute coordinator or a shared manager is needed to
>>      provide a unified global view for migration decisions
>>
>>    - migrate_vma_setup broadcast: one GPU's migration triggers MMU
>>      notifier callbacks in ALL N-1 other drm_gpusvm instances,
>>      causing N-1 unnecessary restore workers to be scheduled. And
>>      creates races between the initiating migration and the other
>>      instance's restore attempts.
>>
>>    - No cross instance migration serialization: each per GPU
>>      drm_gpusvm instance has independent locking, so two GPUs'
>>      "decide -> migrate -> remap" sequences can interleave. While
>>      the kernel page lock prevents truly simultaneous migration of
>>      the same physical page, the losing side's retry (evict from
>>      other GPU's VRAM -> migrate back) triggers broadcast notifier
>>      invalidations and restore workers, compounding the ping pong
>>      problem above.
>>
>>    - No VRAM to VRAM migration: drm_pagemap_migrate_to_devmem()
>>      hardcodes MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_SYSTEM (drm_pagemap.c:328), meaning
>>      it only selects system memory pages for migration.
>>
>>    - CPU fault reverse migration race: CPU page fault triggers
>>      migrate_to_ram while GPU instances are concurrently operating.
>>      Per GPU notifier_lock does not protect cross GPU operations.
>>
>> We believe a strong, well designed solution at the framework level is
>> needed to properly address these problems, and we look forward to
>> discussion and suggestions.
>>
>> Honglei Huang (12):
>>    drm/amdgpu: add SVM UAPI definitions
>>    drm/amdgpu: add SVM data structures and header
>>    drm/amdgpu: add SVM attribute data structures
>>    drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute tree operations
>>    drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute set
>>    drm/amdgpu: add SVM range data structures
>>    drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range PTE flags and GPU mapping
>>    drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range notifier and invalidation
>>    drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range workers
>>    drm/amdgpu: implement SVM core initialization and fini
>>    drm/amdgpu: implement SVM ioctl and fault handler
>>    drm/amdgpu: wire up SVM build system and fault handler
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig            |   11 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile           |   13 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c       |    2 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.c       |  430 ++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.h       |  147 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.c  |  894 ++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.h  |  110 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.c | 1196 +++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.h |   76 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c        |   40 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h        |    4 +
>>   include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h                 |   39 +
>>   12 files changed, 2958 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.h
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.h
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 7d0a66e4bb9081d75c82ec4957c50034cb0ea449
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17 11:29 [RFC/POC PATCH 00/12] POC SVM implementation in AMDGPU based on drm_gpusvm Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 01/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM UAPI definitions Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 02/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM data structures and header Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 03/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM attribute data structures Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 04/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute tree operations Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 05/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute set Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 06/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM range data structures Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 07/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range PTE flags and GPU mapping Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 08/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range notifier and invalidation Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 09/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range workers Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 10/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM core initialization and fini Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 11/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM ioctl and fault handler Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 12/12] drm/amdgpu: wire up SVM build system " Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:48 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 00/12] POC SVM implementation in AMDGPU based on drm_gpusvm Christian König
2026-03-18  8:59   ` Honglei Huang [this message]
2026-03-19  5:08     ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-19 14:17       ` Honglei Huang
2026-03-23  6:31         ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24  7:24           ` Honglei Huang
2026-03-25 22:24             ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-26 12:16               ` Honglei Huang
2026-04-15 10:04                 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-23  6:40                   ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23  7:18                     ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 11:03                       ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-23 20:21                         ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-24 10:43                           ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-27 20:00                             ` Felix Kuehling
2026-04-28  2:23                               ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-30  3:04                                 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23  6:09           ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-23  6:52             ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23  8:22               ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-29  9:56                 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-30  2:56                   ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-30  3:12                     ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae5fe946-4756-43b4-848f-3b545ac61ba7@amd.com \
    --to=honghuan@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=Jenny-Jing.Liu@amd.com \
    --cc=Junhua.Shen@amd.com \
    --cc=Lingshan.Zhu@amd.com \
    --cc=Oak.Zeng@amd.com \
    --cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
    --cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=Xiaogang.Chen@amd.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=honglei1.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox