From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: "Honglei Huang" <honglei1.huang@amd.com>,
Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, Felix.Kuehling@amd.com,
Oak.Zeng@amd.com, Jenny-Jing.Liu@amd.com, Philip.Yang@amd.com,
Xiaogang.Chen@amd.com, Ray.Huang@amd.com, Lingshan.Zhu@amd.com,
Junhua.Shen@amd.com, "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
honghuan@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/POC PATCH 00/12] POC SVM implementation in AMDGPU based on drm_gpusvm
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:48:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e21e8e1a-4d2e-40e9-bbb7-2764cf33e760@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317112958.2925370-1-honglei1.huang@amd.com>
Adding a few XE and drm_gpuvm people on TO.
On 3/17/26 12:29, Honglei Huang wrote:
> From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
>
> This is a POC/draft patch series of SVM feature in amdgpu based on the
> drm_gpusvm framework. The primary purpose of this RFC is to validate
> the framework's applicability, identify implementation challenges,
> and start discussion on framework evolution. This is not a production
> ready submission.
>
> This patch series implements basic SVM support with the following features:
>
> 1. attributes sepatarated from physical page management:
>
> - Attribute layer (amdgpu_svm_attr_tree): a driver side interval
> tree that stores SVM attributes. Managed through the SET_ATTR,
> and mmu notifier callback.
>
> - Physical page layer (drm_gpusvm ranges): managed by the
> drm_gpusvm framework, representing actual HMM backed DMA
> mappings and GPU page table entries.
>
> This separation is necessary:
> - The framework does not support range splitting, so a partial
> munmap destroys the entire overlapping range, including the
> still valid parts. If attributes were stored inside drm_gpusvm
> ranges, they would be lost on unmapping.
> The separate attr tree preserves userspace set attributes
> across range operations.
Isn't that actually intended? When parts of the range unmap then that usually means the whole range isn't valid any more.
>
> - drm_gpusvm range boundaries are determined by fault address
> and pre setted chunk size, not by userspace attribute boundaries.
> Ranges may be rechunked on memory changes. Embedding
> attributes in framework ranges would scatter attr state
> across many small ranges and require complex reassemble
> logic when operate attrbute.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
>
> 2) System memory mapping via drm_gpusvm
>
> The core mapping path uses drm_gpusvm_range_find_or_insert() to
> create ranges, drm_gpusvm_range_get_pages() for HMM page fault
> and DMA mapping, then updates GPU page tables via
> amdgpu_vm_update_range().
>
> 3) IOCTL driven mapping (XNACK off / no GPU fault mode)
>
> On XNACK off hardware the GPU cannot recover from page faults,
> so mappings must be established through ioctl. When
> userspace calls SET_ATTR with ACCESS=ENABLE, the driver
> walks the attr tree and maps all accessible intervals
> to the GPU by amdgpu_svm_range_map_attr_ranges().
>
> 4) Invalidation, GC worker, and restore worker
>
> MMU notifier callbacks (amdgpu_svm_range_invalidate) handle
> three cases based on event type and hardware mode:
> - unmap event: clear GPU PTEs in the notifier context,
> unmap DMA pages, mark ranges as unmapped, flush TLB,
> and enqueue to the GC worker. On XNACK off, also
> quiesce KFD queues and schedule rebuild of the
> still valid portions that were destroyed together with
> the unmapped subregion.
>
> - evict on XNACK off:
> quiesce KFD queues first, then unmap DMA pages and
> enqueue to the restore worker.
Is that done through the DMA fence or by talking directly to the MES/HWS?
Thanks,
Christian.
>
> - evict on XNACK on:
> clear GPU PTEs, unmap DMA pages, and flush TLB, but do
> not schedule any worker. The GPU will fault on next
> access and the fault handler establishes the mapping.
>
> Not supported feature:
> - XNACK on GPU page fault mode
> - migration and prefetch feature
> - Multi GPU support
>
> XNACK on enablement is ongoing.The GPUs that support XNACK on
> are currently only accessible to us via remote lab machines, which slows
> down progress.
>
> Patch overview:
>
> 01/12 UAPI definitions: DRM_AMDGPU_GEM_SVM ioctl, SVM flags,
> SET_ATTR/GET_ATTR operations, attribute types, and related
> structs in amdgpu_drm.h.
>
> 02/12 Core data structures: amdgpu_svm wrapping drm_gpusvm with
> refcount, attr_tree, workqueues, locks, and
> callbacks (begin/end_restore, flush_tlb).
>
> 03/12 Attribute data structures: amdgpu_svm_attrs, attr_range
> (interval tree node), attr_tree, access enum, flag masks,
> and change trigger enum.
>
> 04/12 Attribute tree operations: interval tree lookup, insert,
> remove, and tree create/destroy lifecycle.
>
> 05/12 Attribute set: validate UAPI attributes, apply to internal
> attrs, handle hole/existing range with head/tail splitting,
> compute change triggers, and -EAGAIN retry loop.
> Implements attr_clear_pages for unmap cleanup and attr_get.
>
> 06/12 Range data structures: amdgpu_svm_range extending
> drm_gpusvm_range with gpu_mapped state, pending ops,
> pte_flags cache, and GC/restore queue linkage.
>
> 07/12 PTE flags and GPU mapping: simple gpu pte function,
> GPU page table update with DMA address, range mapping loop:
> find_or_insert -> get_pages -> validate -> update PTE,
> and attribute change driven mapping function.
>
> 08/12 Notifier and invalidation: synchronous GPU PTE clear in
> notifier context, range removal and overlap cleanup,
> rebuild after destroy logic, and MMU event dispatcher
>
> 09/12 Workers: KFD queue quiesce/resume via kgd2kfd APIs, GC
> worker for unmap processing and rebuild, ordered restore
> worker for mapping evicted ranges, and flush/sync
> helpers.
>
> 10/12 Initialization and fini: kmem_cache for range/attr,
> drm_gpusvm_init with chunk sizes, XNACK detection, TLB
> flush helper, and amdgpu_svm init/close/fini lifecycle.
>
> 11/12 IOCTL and fault handler: PASID based SVM lookup with kref
> protection, amdgpu_gem_svm_ioctl dispatcher, and
> amdgpu_svm_handle_fault for GPU page fault recovery.
>
> 12/12 Build integration: Kconfig option (CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_SVM),
> Makefile rules, ioctl table registration, and amdgpu_vm
> hooks (init in make_compute, close/fini, fault dispatch).
>
> Test result:
> on gfx1100(W7900) and gfx943(MI300x)
> kfd test: 95%+ passed, same failed cases with offical relase
> rocr test: all passed
> hip catch test: 20 cases failed in all 5366 cases, +13 failures vs offical relase
>
> During implementation we identified several challenges / design questions:
>
> 1. No range splitting on partial unmap
>
> drm_gpusvm explicitly does not support range splitting in drm_gpusvm.c:122.
> Partial munmap needs to destroy the entire range including the valid interval.
> GPU fault driven hardware can handle this design by extra gpu fault handle,
> but AMDGPU needs to support XNACK off hardware, this design requires driver
> rebuild the valid part in the removed entire range. Whichs bring a very heavy
> restore work in work queue/GC worker: unmap/destroy -> rebuild(insert and map)
> this restore work even heavier than kfd_svm. In previous driver work queue
> only needs to restore or unmap, but in drm_gpusvm driver needs to unmap and restore.
> which brings about more complex logic, heavier worker queue workload, and
> synchronization issues.
>
> 2. Fault driven vs ioctl driven mapping
>
> drm_gpusvm is designed around GPU page fault handlers. The primary entry
> point drm_gpusvm_range_find_or_insert() takes a fault_addr.
> AMDGPU needs to support IOCTL driven mapping cause No XNACK hardware that
> GPU cannot fault at all
>
> The ioctl path cannot hold mmap_read_lock across the entire operation
> because drm_gpusvm_range_find_or_insert() acquires/releases it
> internally. This creates race windows with MMU notifiers / workers.
>
> 3. Multi GPU support
>
> drm_gpusvm binds one drm_device to one instance. In multi GPU systems,
> each GPU gets an independent instance with its own range tree, MMU
> notifiers, notifier_lock, and DMA mappings.
>
> This may brings huge overhead:
> - N x MMU notifier registrations for the same address range
> - N x hmm_range_fault() calls for the same page (KFD: 1x)
> - N x DMA mapping memory
> - N x invalidation + restore worker scheduling per CPU unmap event
> - N x GPU page table flush / TLB invalidation
> - Increased mmap_lock hold time, N callbacks serialize under it
>
> compatibility issues:
> - Quiesce/resume scope mismatch: to integrate with KFD compute
> queues, the driver reuses kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm()/resume_mm()
> which have process level semantics. Under the per GPU
> drm_gpusvm model, maybe there are some issues on sync. To properly
> integrate with KFD under the per SVM model, a compatibility or
> new per VM level queue control APIs maybe need to introduced.
>
> Migration challenges:
>
> - No global migration decision logic: each per GPU SVM
> instance maintains its own attribute tree independently. This
> allows conflicting settings (e.g., GPU0's SVM sets
> PREFERRED_LOC=GPU0 while GPU1's SVM sets PREFERRED_LOC=GPU1
> for the same address range) with no detection or resolution.
> A global attribute coordinator or a shared manager is needed to
> provide a unified global view for migration decisions
>
> - migrate_vma_setup broadcast: one GPU's migration triggers MMU
> notifier callbacks in ALL N-1 other drm_gpusvm instances,
> causing N-1 unnecessary restore workers to be scheduled. And
> creates races between the initiating migration and the other
> instance's restore attempts.
>
> - No cross instance migration serialization: each per GPU
> drm_gpusvm instance has independent locking, so two GPUs'
> "decide -> migrate -> remap" sequences can interleave. While
> the kernel page lock prevents truly simultaneous migration of
> the same physical page, the losing side's retry (evict from
> other GPU's VRAM -> migrate back) triggers broadcast notifier
> invalidations and restore workers, compounding the ping pong
> problem above.
>
> - No VRAM to VRAM migration: drm_pagemap_migrate_to_devmem()
> hardcodes MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_SYSTEM (drm_pagemap.c:328), meaning
> it only selects system memory pages for migration.
>
> - CPU fault reverse migration race: CPU page fault triggers
> migrate_to_ram while GPU instances are concurrently operating.
> Per GPU notifier_lock does not protect cross GPU operations.
>
> We believe a strong, well designed solution at the framework level is
> needed to properly address these problems, and we look forward to
> discussion and suggestions.
>
> Honglei Huang (12):
> drm/amdgpu: add SVM UAPI definitions
> drm/amdgpu: add SVM data structures and header
> drm/amdgpu: add SVM attribute data structures
> drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute tree operations
> drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute set
> drm/amdgpu: add SVM range data structures
> drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range PTE flags and GPU mapping
> drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range notifier and invalidation
> drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range workers
> drm/amdgpu: implement SVM core initialization and fini
> drm/amdgpu: implement SVM ioctl and fault handler
> drm/amdgpu: wire up SVM build system and fault handler
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile | 13 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.c | 430 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.h | 147 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.c | 894 ++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.h | 110 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.c | 1196 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.h | 76 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 40 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h | 4 +
> include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h | 39 +
> 12 files changed, 2958 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_attr.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_svm_range.h
>
>
> base-commit: 7d0a66e4bb9081d75c82ec4957c50034cb0ea449
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 11:29 [RFC/POC PATCH 00/12] POC SVM implementation in AMDGPU based on drm_gpusvm Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 01/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM UAPI definitions Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 02/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM data structures and header Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 03/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM attribute data structures Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 04/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute tree operations Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 05/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM attribute set Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 06/12] drm/amdgpu: add SVM range data structures Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 07/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range PTE flags and GPU mapping Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 08/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range notifier and invalidation Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 09/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM range workers Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 10/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM core initialization and fini Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 11/12] drm/amdgpu: implement SVM ioctl and fault handler Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:29 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 12/12] drm/amdgpu: wire up SVM build system " Honglei Huang
2026-03-17 11:48 ` Christian König [this message]
2026-03-18 8:59 ` [RFC/POC PATCH 00/12] POC SVM implementation in AMDGPU based on drm_gpusvm Honglei Huang
2026-03-19 5:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-19 14:17 ` Honglei Huang
2026-03-23 6:31 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-24 7:24 ` Honglei Huang
2026-03-25 22:24 ` Matthew Brost
2026-03-26 12:16 ` Honglei Huang
2026-04-15 10:04 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-23 6:40 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 7:18 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 11:03 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-23 20:21 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-24 10:43 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-27 20:00 ` Felix Kuehling
2026-04-28 2:23 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-30 3:04 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 6:09 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-23 6:52 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 8:22 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-29 9:56 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-30 2:56 ` Huang, Honglei1
2026-04-30 3:12 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e21e8e1a-4d2e-40e9-bbb7-2764cf33e760@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Jenny-Jing.Liu@amd.com \
--cc=Junhua.Shen@amd.com \
--cc=Lingshan.Zhu@amd.com \
--cc=Oak.Zeng@amd.com \
--cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
--cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=Xiaogang.Chen@amd.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=honghuan@amd.com \
--cc=honglei1.huang@amd.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox