From: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Akash Goel <akash.goel@arm.com>, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/panthor: Don't use the racy drm_gem_lru_remove() helper
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 11:01:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afxi9ab1O9J_7J1Y@e142607> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506-panthor-shrinker-fixes-v1-1-e7721526de96@collabora.com>
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 02:16:26PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> drm_gem_lru_remove() dereference stores drm_gem_object::lru in a local
> variable that's then dereferenced to acquire the LRU lock. Because this
> assignment in done without the LRU lock held, it can race with
> drm_gem_lru_scan() where drm_gem_object::lru is temporarily assigned
> a stack-allcated LRU that goes away when leaving the function. By
> the time we dereference this local lru variable, the object might already
> be gone.
>
> It feels like drm_gem_lru_move_tail() was never meant to be used this
> way, because there's no easy way we can avoid this race unless we defer
> the locking to the caller. Let's add an explicit LRU for unreclaimable
> BOs instead, and have all BOs added to this LRU at creation time.
I would argue that drm_gem_lru_scan() is broken by design. If you're going
to release the LRU lock in the middle of a loop you can expect that someone
will get hold of your stack-allocated LRU and end up picking the pieces.
This patch is fine in itself by trying to avoid stepping into the fight,
but I think we should also add a warning in drm_gem_lru_scan() for future
users to be aware of the dangers.
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Fixes: fb42964e2a76 ("drm/panthor: Add a GEM shrinker")
> Reported-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/work_items/86
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> index 4e4607bca7cc..45b71546f83c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,16 @@ struct panthor_device {
> /** @reclaim.lock: Lock protecting all LRUs */
> struct mutex lock;
>
> + /**
> + * @reclaim.unreclaimable: unreclaimable BOs
> + *
> + * Either the BO is unreclaimable because it has no pages allocated,
> + * or it's unreclaimable because pages are pinned.
> + *
> + * All BOs start in that list at creation time.
> + */
> + struct drm_gem_lru unreclaimable;
> +
> /**
> * @reclaim.unused: BOs with unused pages
> *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> index 13295d7a593d..8e31740126e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void panthor_gem_update_reclaim_state_locked(struct panthor_gem_object *bo,
> drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.gpu_mapped_shared, &bo->base);
> break;
> case PANTHOR_GEM_UNRECLAIMABLE:
> - drm_gem_lru_remove(&bo->base);
> + drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &bo->base);
> break;
> default:
> drm_WARN(&ptdev->base, true, "invalid GEM reclaim state (%d)\n", new_state);
> @@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ static struct panthor_gem_object *
> panthor_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, uint32_t flags,
> struct panthor_vm *exclusive_vm, u32 usage_flags)
> {
> + struct panthor_device *ptdev = container_of(dev, struct panthor_device, base);
> struct panthor_gem_object *bo;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1026,6 +1027,7 @@ panthor_gem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, uint32_t flags,
> }
>
> panthor_gem_debugfs_set_usage_flags(bo, usage_flags);
> + drm_gem_lru_move_tail(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &bo->base);
> return bo;
>
> err_put:
> @@ -1551,6 +1553,7 @@ int panthor_gem_shrinker_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> return ret;
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ptdev->reclaim.vms);
> + drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.unreclaimable, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
> drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.unused, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
> drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.mmapped, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
> drm_gem_lru_init(&ptdev->reclaim.gpu_mapped_shared, &ptdev->reclaim.lock);
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 12:16 [PATCH 0/3] drm/panthor: Fix a race in the shrinker logic Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/panthor: Don't use the racy drm_gem_lru_remove() helper Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 15:40 ` Steven Price
2026-05-06 16:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-07 10:01 ` Liviu Dudau [this message]
2026-05-07 12:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-07 14:40 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-05-07 15:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-07 15:18 ` Rob Clark
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/gem: Fix a race between drm_gem_lru_scan() and drm_gem_object_release() Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 13:21 ` Rob Clark
2026-05-06 14:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-07 10:18 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-05-07 12:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-07 21:38 ` Rob Clark
2026-05-08 8:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-08 13:49 ` Rob Clark
2026-05-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/gem: Stop exposing the racy/unsafe drm_gem_lru_remove() helper Boris Brezillon
2026-05-06 15:40 ` Steven Price
2026-05-07 10:20 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afxi9ab1O9J_7J1Y@e142607 \
--to=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akash.goel@arm.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox