Linux driver-core infrastructure
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFC 0/2] regmap: support firmware-described non-sequential register reads
@ 2026-07-22  8:42 Richard Leitner
  2026-07-22  8:42 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: regmap: add common schema for no-sequential-read Richard Leitner
  2026-07-22  8:42 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] regmap: implement no-sequential-read firmware property Richard Leitner
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Leitner @ 2026-07-22  8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Danilo Krummrich
  Cc: Laurent Pinchart, Dave Stevenson, Alexander Stein, linux-kernel,
	devicetree, driver-core, Richard Leitner

Hi all,

this series adds support for firmware/device-tree described constraints
on sequential register reads.

The motivating use case are camera modules from Vision Components.
These modules may integrate image sensors that normally support
incrementing multi-register reads, while the MCU (which sits basically
"between" the I2C host and the camera sensors) breaks them. In such
cases, single-register reads work, but sequential/bulk register reads do
not.

This limitation is therefore not a property of the sensor silicon
itself, but of the hardware module/integration in which the device is
used. As a result, it cannot be identified from the deivce driver and
handling it in each affected device driver does not scale well.

To address this, the series introduces a common firmware property
(no-sequential-read) describing hardware integrations where reading
multiple consecutive registers in a single operation is not reliable.
regmap then consumes that property and maps it to its existing
use_single_read configuration. This keeps the hardware constraint
described in firmware/device-tree while applying it in the layer that
already owns the register read transfer policy.

The initial discussion that motivated this approach can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260721151614.GN50424@killaraus.ideasonboard.com/

Feedback is especially welcome on the property naming, the placement of
the common binding schema, and if regmap is the best place to implment this.

Thanks,
Richard

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260721151614.GN50424@killaraus.ideasonboard.com/
Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@linux.dev>
---
Richard Leitner (2):
      dt-bindings: regmap: add common schema for no-sequential-read
      regmap: implement no-sequential-read firmware property

 .../devicetree/bindings/regmap/common.yaml         | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c                       | 14 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: 248951ddc14de84de3910f9b13f51491a8cd91df
change-id: 20260722-regmap-single-read-a2e95070cd66

Best regards,
--  
Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@linux.dev>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-22  8:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-22  8:42 [PATCH RFC 0/2] regmap: support firmware-described non-sequential register reads Richard Leitner
2026-07-22  8:42 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: regmap: add common schema for no-sequential-read Richard Leitner
2026-07-22  8:42 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] regmap: implement no-sequential-read firmware property Richard Leitner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox