* [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete
@ 2026-09-17 14:42 Adarsh Das
2026-09-17 14:51 ` Greg KH
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel, Adarsh Das,
syzbot
When a network namespace is deleted, we free its uevent socket. But
sometimes a device in that namespace is still being removed and tries to
send a uevent through that socket. The socket is already freed, so KASAN
reports a use-after-free.
This patch attempts the fix of taking a lock around both the send path
and the free path, and clear the pointer before freeing so nobody uses
it after free.
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4393dfdddf166f2de2b0
Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com>
---
lib/kobject_uevent.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
index ddbc4d7482d2..ecba33abb6b1 100644
--- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c
+++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
@@ -411,9 +411,15 @@ static int kobject_uevent_net_broadcast(struct kobject *kobj,
devpath);
else {
const struct net *net = container_of(ns, struct net, ns);
+ struct uevent_sock *ue_sk;
- ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(net->uevent_sock->sk, env,
- action_string, devpath);
+ mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
+ ue_sk = net->uevent_sock;
+ if (ue_sk && ue_sk->sk)
+ ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(ue_sk->sk, env,
+ action_string,
+ devpath);
+ mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
}
#endif
@@ -804,13 +810,17 @@ static int uevent_net_init(struct net *net)
static void uevent_net_exit(struct net *net)
{
- struct uevent_sock *ue_sk = net->uevent_sock;
+ struct uevent_sock *ue_sk;
- if (sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) {
- mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
+ ue_sk = net->uevent_sock;
+ net->uevent_sock = NULL;
+ if (ue_sk && sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns)
list_del(&ue_sk->list);
- mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
- }
+ mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
+
+ if (!ue_sk)
+ return;
netlink_kernel_release(ue_sk->sk);
kfree(ue_sk);
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-17 14:42 [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 14:51 ` Greg KH 2026-09-17 15:18 ` Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 17:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 17:08 ` Adarsh Das 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2026-09-17 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adarsh Das; +Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel, syzbot On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 08:12:06PM +0530, Adarsh Das wrote: > When a network namespace is deleted, we free its uevent socket. But > sometimes a device in that namespace is still being removed and tries to > send a uevent through that socket. The socket is already freed, so KASAN > reports a use-after-free. > > This patch attempts the fix of taking a lock around both the send path > and the free path, and clear the pointer before freeing so nobody uses > it after free. > > Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 > Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> > --- > lib/kobject_uevent.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Did you forget an Assisted-by: tag? How was this tested? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-17 14:51 ` Greg KH @ 2026-09-17 15:18 ` Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 15:21 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh Cc: dakr, driver-core, linux-kernel, rafael, stable, syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 Hi, Sorry, I wasn't aware of the Assisted-by tag before. Should I send a V2 with it? For testing I ran syzbot's C repro with -smp 4 on master, with multiple parallel instances of the repro. I was able to reproduce the bug: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kobject_uevent_env+ Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800fa7f090 by task kworker/u16:5 CPU: 3 Workqueue: ib-unreg-wq ib_unregister_work Call Trace: kasan_report kobject_uevent_env+0xc71/0xd90 device_del+0x7c7/0xcf0 disable_device+0x1d2/0x260 __ib_unregister_device+0x26b/0x400 ib_unregister_work+0x19/0x30 worker_thread kthread Allocated by task 498: uevent_net_init+0xe5/0x340 setup_net copy_net_ns unshare_nsproxy_namespaces ksys_unshare Freed by task 63: kfree ops_undo_list cleanup_net worker_thread The buggy address belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32 With this patch applied, I ran the same repro repeatedly (including parallel runs) and did not see the KASAN error anymore. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-17 15:18 ` Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 15:21 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2026-09-17 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adarsh Das Cc: dakr, driver-core, linux-kernel, rafael, stable, syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 08:48:30PM +0530, Adarsh Das wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, I wasn't aware of the Assisted-by tag before. Should I send a > V2 with it? Please do. > For testing I ran syzbot's C repro with -smp 4 on master, with > multiple parallel instances of the repro. I was able to reproduce > the bug: > > BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kobject_uevent_env+ > Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800fa7f090 by task kworker/u16:5 > CPU: 3 > Workqueue: ib-unreg-wq ib_unregister_work > Call Trace: > kasan_report > kobject_uevent_env+0xc71/0xd90 > device_del+0x7c7/0xcf0 > disable_device+0x1d2/0x260 > __ib_unregister_device+0x26b/0x400 > ib_unregister_work+0x19/0x30 > worker_thread > kthread > Allocated by task 498: > uevent_net_init+0xe5/0x340 > setup_net > copy_net_ns > unshare_nsproxy_namespaces > ksys_unshare > Freed by task 63: > kfree > ops_undo_list > cleanup_net > worker_thread > The buggy address belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32 > > With this patch applied, I ran the same repro repeatedly (including > parallel runs) and did not see the KASAN error anymore. Did syzbot also test this? And I have no context here at all, sorry, please realize that some of us get 1000+ emails a day... thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-17 14:42 [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 14:51 ` Greg KH @ 2026-09-17 17:08 ` Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 17:08 ` Adarsh Das 2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh; +Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel Hi Greg, v2 adds Assisted-by and Tested-by tags as requested. Local testing: syzbot C repro on unfixed master with -smp 4 (parallel runs) reproduced the KASAN UAF. With patch applied, no KASAN. Syzbot testing: #syz test with patch on upstream — Result OK https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 Adarsh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-17 14:42 [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 14:51 ` Greg KH 2026-09-17 17:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 17:08 ` Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 17:40 ` Greg KH 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh; +Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel, Adarsh Das, syzbot When a network namespace is deleted, we free its uevent socket. But sometimes a device in that namespace is still being removed and tries to send a uevent through that socket. The socket is already freed, so KASAN reports a use-after-free. This patch attempts the fix of taking a lock around both the send path and the free path, and clear the pointer before freeing so nobody uses it after free. Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Tested-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> Assisted-by: Cursor AI Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> --- lib/kobject_uevent.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c index ddbc4d7482d2..ecba33abb6b1 100644 --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c @@ -411,9 +411,15 @@ static int kobject_uevent_net_broadcast(struct kobject *kobj, devpath); else { const struct net *net = container_of(ns, struct net, ns); + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; - ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(net->uevent_sock->sk, env, - action_string, devpath); + mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + if (ue_sk && ue_sk->sk) + ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(ue_sk->sk, env, + action_string, + devpath); + mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex); } #endif @@ -804,13 +810,17 @@ static int uevent_net_init(struct net *net) static void uevent_net_exit(struct net *net) { - struct uevent_sock *ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; - if (sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) { - mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); + mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + net->uevent_sock = NULL; + if (ue_sk && sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) list_del(&ue_sk->list); - mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex); - } + mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex); + + if (!ue_sk) + return; netlink_kernel_release(ue_sk->sk); kfree(ue_sk); -- 2.55.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-17 17:08 ` Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-17 17:40 ` Greg KH 2026-09-18 6:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Adarsh Das 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2026-09-17 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adarsh Das; +Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel, syzbot On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 10:38:26PM +0530, Adarsh Das wrote: > When a network namespace is deleted, we free its uevent socket. But > sometimes a device in that namespace is still being removed and tries to > send a uevent through that socket. The socket is already freed, so KASAN > reports a use-after-free. > > This patch attempts the fix of taking a lock around both the send path > and the free path, and clear the pointer before freeing so nobody uses > it after free. > > Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 > Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> > Tested-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> > Assisted-by: Cursor AI > Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> > --- > lib/kobject_uevent.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c > index ddbc4d7482d2..ecba33abb6b1 100644 > --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c > +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c > @@ -411,9 +411,15 @@ static int kobject_uevent_net_broadcast(struct kobject *kobj, > devpath); > else { > const struct net *net = container_of(ns, struct net, ns); > + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; > > - ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(net->uevent_sock->sk, env, > - action_string, devpath); > + mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); Can't you use a guard to make this a lot cleaner? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-17 17:40 ` Greg KH @ 2026-09-18 6:08 ` Adarsh Das 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-18 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel, syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0, Adarsh Das When a network namespace is deleted, we free its uevent socket. But sometimes a device in that namespace is still being removed and tries to send a uevent through that socket. The socket is already freed, so KASAN reports a use-after-free. This patch attempts the fix of taking a lock around both the send path and the free path, and clear the pointer before freeing so nobody uses it after free. Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Tested-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> --- lib/kobject_uevent.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c index ddbc4d7482d2..cb674c2c3432 100644 --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ * Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> */ +#include <linux/cleanup.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <linux/kobject.h> @@ -411,9 +412,14 @@ static int kobject_uevent_net_broadcast(struct kobject *kobj, devpath); else { const struct net *net = container_of(ns, struct net, ns); - - ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(net->uevent_sock->sk, env, - action_string, devpath); + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; + + guard(mutex)(&uevent_sock_mutex); + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + if (ue_sk && ue_sk->sk) + ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(ue_sk->sk, env, + action_string, + devpath); } #endif @@ -804,14 +810,19 @@ static int uevent_net_init(struct net *net) static void uevent_net_exit(struct net *net) { - struct uevent_sock *ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; - if (sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) { - mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); - list_del(&ue_sk->list); - mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex); + { + guard(mutex)(&uevent_sock_mutex); + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + net->uevent_sock = NULL; + if (ue_sk && sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) + list_del(&ue_sk->list); } + if (!ue_sk) + return; + netlink_kernel_release(ue_sk->sk); kfree(ue_sk); } -- 2.55.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-18 6:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2026-09-18 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adarsh Das Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel, syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:38:26AM +0530, Adarsh Das wrote: > When a network namespace is deleted, we free its uevent socket. But > sometimes a device in that namespace is still being removed and tries to > send a uevent through that socket. The socket is already freed, so KASAN > reports a use-after-free. > > This patch attempts the fix of taking a lock around both the send path > and the free path, and clear the pointer before freeing so nobody uses > it after free. > > Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 > Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> > Tested-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> > --- > lib/kobject_uevent.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c > index ddbc4d7482d2..cb674c2c3432 100644 > --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c > +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > * Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> > */ > > +#include <linux/cleanup.h> > #include <linux/spinlock.h> > #include <linux/string.h> > #include <linux/kobject.h> > @@ -411,9 +412,14 @@ static int kobject_uevent_net_broadcast(struct kobject *kobj, > devpath); > else { > const struct net *net = container_of(ns, struct net, ns); > - > - ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(net->uevent_sock->sk, env, > - action_string, devpath); > + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; > + > + guard(mutex)(&uevent_sock_mutex); > + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; > + if (ue_sk && ue_sk->sk) > + ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(ue_sk->sk, env, > + action_string, > + devpath); > } > #endif > > @@ -804,14 +810,19 @@ static int uevent_net_init(struct net *net) > > static void uevent_net_exit(struct net *net) > { > - struct uevent_sock *ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; > + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; > > - if (sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) { > - mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); > - list_del(&ue_sk->list); > - mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex); > + { > + guard(mutex)(&uevent_sock_mutex); > + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; > + net->uevent_sock = NULL; > + if (ue_sk && sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) > + list_del(&ue_sk->list); > } > > + if (!ue_sk) > + return; > + > netlink_kernel_release(ue_sk->sk); > kfree(ue_sk); > } > -- > 2.55.0 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-18 6:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Adarsh Das 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH @ 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH 2026-09-18 9:43 ` [PATCH v4] " Adarsh Das 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2026-09-18 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adarsh Das Cc: rafael, dakr, driver-core, stable, linux-kernel, syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:38:26AM +0530, Adarsh Das wrote: > @@ -804,14 +810,19 @@ static int uevent_net_init(struct net *net) > > static void uevent_net_exit(struct net *net) > { > - struct uevent_sock *ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; > + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; > > - if (sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) { > - mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); > - list_del(&ue_sk->list); > - mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex); > + { > + guard(mutex)(&uevent_sock_mutex); LLMs don't know how to use these correctly, shouldn't this just be a scoped_guard()? No extra {} like that please, it's not normal kernel coding style at all. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH @ 2026-09-18 9:43 ` Adarsh Das 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Adarsh Das @ 2026-09-18 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh Cc: adarshdas950, dakr, driver-core, linux-kernel, rafael, stable, syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0 When a network namespace is deleted, we free its uevent socket. But sometimes a device in that namespace is still being removed and tries to send a uevent through that socket. The socket is already freed, so KASAN reports a use-after-free. Take a lock around both the send path and the free path, and clear the pointer before freeing so nobody uses it after free. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+4393dfdddf166f2de2b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> Assisted-by: LLM Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260917144206.85836-1-adarshdas950@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Adarsh Das <adarshdas950@gmail.com> --- v4: - Use scoped_guard(mutex) instead of block in uevent_net_exit v3: - Use guard(mutex) per review v2: - Add Assisted-by and Tested-by tags per review lib/kobject_uevent.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c index ddbc4d7482d2..14e2e15d4ea7 100644 --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ * Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com> */ +#include <linux/cleanup.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <linux/kobject.h> @@ -411,9 +412,14 @@ static int kobject_uevent_net_broadcast(struct kobject *kobj, devpath); else { const struct net *net = container_of(ns, struct net, ns); - - ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(net->uevent_sock->sk, env, - action_string, devpath); + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; + + guard(mutex)(&uevent_sock_mutex); + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + if (ue_sk && ue_sk->sk) + ret = uevent_net_broadcast_tagged(ue_sk->sk, env, + action_string, + devpath); } #endif @@ -804,14 +810,18 @@ static int uevent_net_init(struct net *net) static void uevent_net_exit(struct net *net) { - struct uevent_sock *ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + struct uevent_sock *ue_sk; - if (sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) { - mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex); - list_del(&ue_sk->list); - mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex); + scoped_guard(mutex, &uevent_sock_mutex) { + ue_sk = net->uevent_sock; + net->uevent_sock = NULL; + if (ue_sk && sock_net(ue_sk->sk)->user_ns == &init_user_ns) + list_del(&ue_sk->list); } + if (!ue_sk) + return; + netlink_kernel_release(ue_sk->sk); kfree(ue_sk); } -- 2.55.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-18 9:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-09-17 14:42 [PATCH] kobject: fix uevent socket use-after-free on net namespace delete Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 14:51 ` Greg KH 2026-09-17 15:18 ` Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 15:21 ` Greg KH 2026-09-17 17:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 17:08 ` Adarsh Das 2026-09-17 17:40 ` Greg KH 2026-09-18 6:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Adarsh Das 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH 2026-09-18 8:14 ` Greg KH 2026-09-18 9:43 ` [PATCH v4] " Adarsh Das
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox