From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: <driver-core@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] w1: use match() callback instead of hardwiring dev->driver
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 21:07:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLA65O7OWMD3.PSUP4Y4DE2VG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2083d2e3-9e59-4c70-a79c-d8133316769f@kernel.org>
On Tue Sep 8, 2026 at 4:49 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/08/2026 00:54, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> static const struct bus_type w1_bus_type = {
>> .name = "w1",
>> + .match = w1_match,
>> .uevent = w1_uevent,
>> };
>>
>> struct device_driver w1_master_driver = {
>> .name = "w1_master_driver",
>> .bus = &w1_bus_type,
>> - .probe = w1_master_probe,
>> };
>>
>> struct device w1_master_device = {
>> .parent = NULL,
>> .bus = &w1_bus_type,
>> + .type = &w1_master_device_type,
>> .init_name = "w1 bus master",
>> - .driver = &w1_master_driver,
>> .release = &w1_master_release
>> };
>>
>> @@ -195,8 +208,8 @@ static struct device_driver w1_slave_driver = {
>> struct device w1_slave_device = {
>> .parent = NULL,
>> .bus = &w1_bus_type,
>> + .type = &w1_slave_device_type,
>
> This code is disabled, so probably should be cleaned up before we start
> improving it.
Maybe? I don't know if it was left there intentionally. So I just adjusted it
conservatively, as it's also technically unrelated.
If it wasn't left there on purpose, I can add a preceding patch to remove it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 22:54 [PATCH 1/3] w1: use match() callback instead of hardwiring dev->driver Danilo Krummrich
2026-08-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] w1: move slave uevent into w1_slave_device_type Danilo Krummrich
2026-09-08 14:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-08 19:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-08-20 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] w1: stop using struct device template for master devices Danilo Krummrich
2026-09-08 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] w1: use match() callback instead of hardwiring dev->driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-08 19:07 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLA65O7OWMD3.PSUP4Y4DE2VG@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox