Linux DTrace development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eugene.loh@oracle.com
To: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] Let USDT module names contain dots
Date: Tue,  4 Jun 2024 14:11:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604181113.11505-4-eugene.loh@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240604181113.11505-1-eugene.loh@oracle.com>

From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>

Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
---
 dtprobed/dof_stash.c | 5 +++++
 libdtrace/dt_pid.c   | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/dtprobed/dof_stash.c b/dtprobed/dof_stash.c
index 62418b66..44c67462 100644
--- a/dtprobed/dof_stash.c
+++ b/dtprobed/dof_stash.c
@@ -589,6 +589,10 @@ dof_stash_write_parsed(pid_t pid, dev_t dev, ino_t ino, dt_list_t *accum)
 							    mod, fun, prb)) == NULL)
 				goto err_provider;
 
+#if 0
+This does not make any sense.  We are checking parsedfn against "." and "..",
+but parsedfn comes from make_probespec_name(), whose output is of the form
+"%s:%s:%s:%s" and therefore can never be "." or "..".
 			/*
 			 * Ban "." and ".." as name components.  Obviously names
 			 * containing dots are commonplace (shared libraries,
@@ -604,6 +608,7 @@ dof_stash_write_parsed(pid_t pid, dev_t dev, ino_t ino, dt_list_t *accum)
 			if (strcmp(parsedfn, ".") == 0 ||
 			    strcmp(parsedfn, "..") == 0)
 				goto err_provider;
+#endif
 
 			op = "probe module";
 
diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
index 7c7d7e30..93a7ce76 100644
--- a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
+++ b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
@@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, dt_proc_t *dpr, dtrace_probedesc_t
 
 	assert(pvp->impl != NULL && pvp->impl->provide_probe != NULL);
 
+#if 0
 	if (strchr(pdp->prv, '.') != NULL ||
 	    strchr(pdp->mod, '.') != NULL ||
 	    strchr(pdp->fun, '.') != NULL ||
@@ -840,6 +841,7 @@ dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, dt_proc_t *dpr, dtrace_probedesc_t
 		dt_dprintf("Probe component contains dots: cannot be a USDT probe.\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
+#endif
 
 	if (asprintf(&probepath, "%s/probes/%i/%s/%s/%s/%s", dtp->dt_dofstash_path,
 		     dpr->dpr_pid, pdp->prv[0] == '\0' ? "*" : pdp->prv,
-- 
2.18.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-04 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-04 18:10 "proof of concept" for systemwide USDT eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 01/14] Move comment closer to the code it describes eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:21   ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 02/14] Clean up prp/uprp variable names eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:44   ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-06-05 18:18     ` Eugene Loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` eugene.loh [this message]
2024-06-04 20:42   ` [DTrace-devel] [PATCH 03/14] Let USDT module names contain dots Kris Van Hees
2024-06-04 22:30     ` Eugene Loh
2024-06-07 18:48       ` Nick Alcock
2024-06-07 22:22         ` Eugene Loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 04/14] Track uprobe provider descriptions eugene.loh
2024-06-04 21:10   ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-06-07 21:40     ` Eugene Loh
2024-06-07 22:16       ` Kris Van Hees
2024-06-10 21:23         ` Eugene Loh
2024-06-10 21:31           ` Kris Van Hees
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 05/14] Add a hook for a provider-specific "update" function eugene.loh
2024-06-04 21:38   ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-06-10 22:14     ` Eugene Loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 06/14] Add clauses to per-uprobe list eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 07/14] Create the BPF uprobes map eugene.loh
2024-06-05  4:33   ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-06-10 20:55     ` Eugene Loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 08/14] Use uprobes map to call clauses conditionally eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 09/14] Systemwide USDT WIP eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 10/14] Fix the consumer's picture of the EPID eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 11/14] Back out the previous patch eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 12/14] Fix comments that hardwire DBUF_ offsets eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 13/14] Clean up some comments eugene.loh
2024-06-04 18:11 ` [PATCH 14/14] Have the consumer get the PRID from the output buffer eugene.loh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240604181113.11505-4-eugene.loh@oracle.com \
    --to=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox