Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] tests: add some tests validating skipped functions due to uncertain arg location

[Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>]

On 7/15/25 1:04 AM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> On Wed Jul 9, 2025 at 6:21 PM CEST, Alan Maguire wrote:
>> On 07/07/2025 20:36, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
>>> On 7/7/25 7:14 AM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
>>>> On Mon Jul 7, 2025 at 4:02 PM CEST, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
>>>> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> I think a proper fix for this is differentiating two variants of
>>> LSK__STOP_LOADING: stop because of an error, and stop because there is
>>> nothing else to do. That would require a bit of refactoring.
>>>
>>> Alan, Arnaldo, what do you think?
>>>
>>
>> Would it suffice to treat LSK__STOP_LOADING as an error in the BTF
>> encoding case, and not otherwise? That's a bit of hack; ideally I
>> suppose we'd introduce LSK__ABORT (like DWARF_CB_ABORT) and use it for
>> all the failure modes, reserving LSK__STOP_LOADING for cases where we
>> are done processing rather than we met an error.
> 
> Ihor, Alan, is anyone one of you planning to work on it ? If not, do you
> want me take a look and implement one of the solution suggested above ? I
> guess it's best to aim for Alan's second suggestion first (introducing a
> new LSK enum to represent a failure), otherwise the simpler solution
> distinguishing reasons for LSK__STOP_LOADING.

If you're willing to work on this, please go ahead.

It's not directly related to this series though, so maybe a separate
patch.

> 
> Alexis
>