* Question on --buffer_compress_percentage @ 2013-05-25 1:12 Matthew Eaton 2013-05-27 8:21 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Matthew Eaton @ 2013-05-25 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: fio Hello fio group, Can anyone tell me if --buffer_compress_percentage fills the buffer with random data and reuses that data or if it refills with random data for each submit? If you want the latter behavior should you combine with --refill_buffers? Thanks for your help! -Matt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on --buffer_compress_percentage 2013-05-25 1:12 Question on --buffer_compress_percentage Matthew Eaton @ 2013-05-27 8:21 ` Jens Axboe 2013-06-02 2:11 ` Matthew Eaton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2013-05-27 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Eaton; +Cc: fio On Fri, May 24 2013, Matthew Eaton wrote: > Hello fio group, > > Can anyone tell me if --buffer_compress_percentage fills the buffer > with random data and reuses that data or if it refills with random > data for each submit? If you want the latter behavior should you > combine with --refill_buffers? That is actually explained in the man page / HOWTO: buffer_compress_percentage=int If this is set, then fio will attempt to provide IO buffer content (on WRITEs) that compress to the specified level. Fio does this by providing a mix of random data and zeroes. Note that this is per block size unit, for file/disk wide compression level that matches this setting, you'll also want to set refill_buffers. So the answer to your question is yes. Fio will reuse IO buffers, unless --refill_buffers is set. If you do not set refill_buffers with buffer_compress_percentage, then you will have identically compressible blocks written. And that would only give you the per-block compression ratio specified, on a broader scale it would compress more. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on --buffer_compress_percentage 2013-05-27 8:21 ` Jens Axboe @ 2013-06-02 2:11 ` Matthew Eaton 2013-06-02 12:20 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Matthew Eaton @ 2013-06-02 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: fio Hi Jens, Thank you for your explanation. I have another question in regards to buffer_compress_percentage if you don't mind. If I were to call fio with "--refill_buffers --buffer_compress_percentage=0", would this be the same as setting only "--refill_buffers"? Also, if I were to call fio with "--refill_buffers --buffer_compress_percentage=100", would this be the same as setting "--zero_buffers"? Thanks again for your help! On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote: > On Fri, May 24 2013, Matthew Eaton wrote: >> Hello fio group, >> >> Can anyone tell me if --buffer_compress_percentage fills the buffer >> with random data and reuses that data or if it refills with random >> data for each submit? If you want the latter behavior should you >> combine with --refill_buffers? > > That is actually explained in the man page / HOWTO: > > buffer_compress_percentage=int If this is set, then fio will attempt to > provide IO buffer content (on WRITEs) that compress to > the specified level. Fio does this by providing a mix of > random data and zeroes. Note that this is per block size > unit, for file/disk wide compression level that matches > this setting, you'll also want to set refill_buffers. > > So the answer to your question is yes. Fio will reuse IO buffers, unless > --refill_buffers is set. If you do not set refill_buffers with > buffer_compress_percentage, then you will have identically compressible > blocks written. And that would only give you the per-block compression > ratio specified, on a broader scale it would compress more. > > -- > Jens Axboe > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on --buffer_compress_percentage 2013-06-02 2:11 ` Matthew Eaton @ 2013-06-02 12:20 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2013-06-02 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Eaton; +Cc: fio On Sat, Jun 01 2013, Matthew Eaton wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Thank you for your explanation. I have another question in regards to > buffer_compress_percentage if you don't mind. > > If I were to call fio with "--refill_buffers > --buffer_compress_percentage=0", would this be the same as setting > only "--refill_buffers"? Yes, those would be equivalant as the default is to use fully randomized data contents. > Also, if I were to call fio with "--refill_buffers > --buffer_compress_percentage=100", would this be the same as setting > "--zero_buffers"? Yes. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-02 12:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-05-25 1:12 Question on --buffer_compress_percentage Matthew Eaton 2013-05-27 8:21 ` Jens Axboe 2013-06-02 2:11 ` Matthew Eaton 2013-06-02 12:20 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox