Flexible I/O Tester development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* using ioengine=sg
@ 2010-08-26 19:25 Chuck Tuffli
  2010-08-27  7:03 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Tuffli @ 2010-08-26 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fio

Hi -

Reading the man page under ioengine, it mentions that sg will do
asynchronous IO if the target is the sg character device. So I'm
assuming that means a job file something like

> cat sgtest.fio
[global]
bs=512b
readwrite=read
ioengine=sg
size=1m

[/dev/sg2]

but when I run it,

> uname -srp
Linux 2.6.34-12-default x86_64
> ls -l /dev/sg2
crw-rw---- 1 root disk 21, 2 Aug 26 17:46 /dev/sg2
> ./fio --version
fio 1.43.1
> sudo ./fio sgtest.fio
/dev/sg2: (g=0): rw=read, bs=512-512/512-512, ioengine=sg, iodepth=1
Starting 1 process
fio: pid=3147, got signal=11


Run status group 0 (all jobs):
fio: file hash not empty on exit

Any idea what I'm doing wrong or might be missing on the system? Thanks!

---chuck

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: using ioengine=sg
  2010-08-26 19:25 using ioengine=sg Chuck Tuffli
@ 2010-08-27  7:03 ` Jens Axboe
  2010-08-27 15:40   ` Chuck Tuffli
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2010-08-27  7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chuck Tuffli; +Cc: fio

On 2010-08-26 21:25, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> Reading the man page under ioengine, it mentions that sg will do
> asynchronous IO if the target is the sg character device. So I'm
> assuming that means a job file something like
> 
>> cat sgtest.fio
> [global]
> bs=512b
> readwrite=read
> ioengine=sg
> size=1m
> 
> [/dev/sg2]
> 
> but when I run it,
> 
>> uname -srp
> Linux 2.6.34-12-default x86_64
>> ls -l /dev/sg2
> crw-rw---- 1 root disk 21, 2 Aug 26 17:46 /dev/sg2
>> ./fio --version
> fio 1.43.1
>> sudo ./fio sgtest.fio
> /dev/sg2: (g=0): rw=read, bs=512-512/512-512, ioengine=sg, iodepth=1
> Starting 1 process
> fio: pid=3147, got signal=11
> 
> 
> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> fio: file hash not empty on exit
> 
> Any idea what I'm doing wrong or might be missing on the system? Thanks!

You are not doing anything wrong, it's a bug. This patch will fix
it.

diff --git a/engines/sg.c b/engines/sg.c
index 57c3834..bc82b09 100644
--- a/engines/sg.c
+++ b/engines/sg.c
@@ -274,17 +274,16 @@ static struct io_u *fio_sgio_event(struct thread_data *td, int event)
 static int fio_sgio_get_bs(struct thread_data *td, unsigned int *bs)
 {
 	struct sgio_data *sd = td->io_ops->data;
-	struct io_u *io_u;
+	struct io_u io_u;
 	struct sg_io_hdr *hdr;
 	unsigned char buf[8];
 	int ret;
 
-	io_u = __get_io_u(td);
-	io_u->file = td->files[0];
-	assert(io_u);
+	memset(&io_u, 0, sizeof(io_u));
+	io_u.file = td->files[0];
 
-	hdr = &io_u->hdr;
-	sgio_hdr_init(sd, hdr, io_u, 0);
+	hdr = &io_u.hdr;
+	sgio_hdr_init(sd, hdr, &io_u, 0);
 	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
 
 	hdr->cmdp[0] = 0x25;
@@ -292,14 +291,11 @@ static int fio_sgio_get_bs(struct thread_data *td, unsigned int *bs)
 	hdr->dxferp = buf;
 	hdr->dxfer_len = sizeof(buf);
 
-	ret = fio_sgio_doio(td, io_u, 1);
-	if (ret) {
-		put_io_u(td, io_u);
+	ret = fio_sgio_doio(td, &io_u, 1);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	*bs = (buf[4] << 24) | (buf[5] << 16) | (buf[6] << 8) | buf[7];
-	put_io_u(td, io_u);
 	return 0;
 }
 

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: using ioengine=sg
  2010-08-27  7:03 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2010-08-27 15:40   ` Chuck Tuffli
  2010-08-27 16:56     ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Tuffli @ 2010-08-27 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> wrote:
...
> You are not doing anything wrong, it's a bug. This patch will fix
> it.

Thanks for the patch. Now I see the following

> sudo ./fio sgtest.fio
/dev/sg2: (g=0): rw=read, bs=512-512/512-512, ioengine=sg, iodepth=1
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=0): [R] [12900.0% done] [0K/0K /s] [0/0 iops] [eta
1158050441d:06h:58m:08s]

---chuck


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: using ioengine=sg
  2010-08-27 15:40   ` Chuck Tuffli
@ 2010-08-27 16:56     ` Jens Axboe
  2010-08-27 21:37       ` Chuck Tuffli
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2010-08-27 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chuck Tuffli; +Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org

On 2010-08-27 17:40, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> wrote:
> ...
>> You are not doing anything wrong, it's a bug. This patch will fix
>> it.
> 
> Thanks for the patch. Now I see the following
> 
>> sudo ./fio sgtest.fio
> /dev/sg2: (g=0): rw=read, bs=512-512/512-512, ioengine=sg, iodepth=1
> Starting 1 process
> Jobs: 1 (f=0): [R] [12900.0% done] [0K/0K /s] [0/0 iops] [eta
> 1158050441d:06h:58m:08s]

Works for me, exact same job file. Can you do an sg_inq /dev/sg2?

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: using ioengine=sg
  2010-08-27 16:56     ` Jens Axboe
@ 2010-08-27 21:37       ` Chuck Tuffli
  2010-08-28  6:53         ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Tuffli @ 2010-08-27 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
...
> Works for me, exact same job file. Can you do an sg_inq /dev/sg2?

Ugh, inquiries failed to that device but not others. Something went
wrong with the LLDD, but a reboot cleared everything up. BTW, the
patch really helped with the performance I'm seeing. Thanks again!

---chuck


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: using ioengine=sg
  2010-08-27 21:37       ` Chuck Tuffli
@ 2010-08-28  6:53         ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2010-08-28  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chuck Tuffli; +Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org

On 08/27/2010 11:37 PM, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
> ...
>> Works for me, exact same job file. Can you do an sg_inq /dev/sg2?
> 
> Ugh, inquiries failed to that device but not others. Something went
> wrong with the LLDD, but a reboot cleared everything up. BTW, the
> patch really helped with the performance I'm seeing. Thanks again!

Great, I was starting to worry there was more than one bug there :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-28  6:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-26 19:25 using ioengine=sg Chuck Tuffli
2010-08-27  7:03 ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-27 15:40   ` Chuck Tuffli
2010-08-27 16:56     ` Jens Axboe
2010-08-27 21:37       ` Chuck Tuffli
2010-08-28  6:53         ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox