From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Shrirang Phansalkar <sphansalkar@stec-inc.com>
Cc: "fio@vger.kernel.org" <fio@vger.kernel.org>,
Prasad Joshi <pjoshi@stec-inc.com>
Subject: Re: problem while executing fio on multiple disks
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:32:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E68A7C9.1020702@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C4B5704C6FEB5244B2A1BCC8CF83B86B02CF0A@MYMBX.MY.STEC-INC.AD>
On 2011-09-08 11:55, Shrirang Phansalkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to execute fio with the following job file, but I have some issues with it.
>
> [globals]
> rw=randrw
> size=10M
> ioengine=sync
> blocksize=4k
> numjobs=16
> direct=1
> iodepth=32
> thread
>
> [thread1]
> filename=/dev/sdb
> stonewall
>
> [thread2]
> filename=/dev/sdc
> stonewall
>
> [thread3]
> filename=/dev/sdd
> stonewall
>
>
> After its completion in Disk stats I got util as :
>
> sdb: util=99.64%
> sdc: util=51.72%
> sdd: util=34.76%
>
> where as expected util for all 3 disks should be somewhat similar ( all 3 disks are of same size)
>
> But if I run fio using separate jobfile for every disk, then I am getting almost similar disk util for each disk (around util=98% for each disk).
>
> Pl let me know that if there is some problem with the fio or there is something wrong with my jobfile.
Hmm, I'm assuming the performance is about the same (whether run with
this file, or separately)?
Looks like the utilization is done prior to the job being started, hence
you get ~100%, ~50%, and ~33%. So looks like just an accounting bug,
I'll take a look at it.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-08 9:55 problem while executing fio on multiple disks Shrirang Phansalkar
2011-09-08 11:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-09-08 11:32 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E68A7C9.1020702@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjoshi@stec-inc.com \
--cc=sphansalkar@stec-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox