* units for latency in --minimal mode
@ 2012-03-30 20:01 Lucian Grijincu
2012-03-31 23:28 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lucian Grijincu @ 2012-03-30 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fio@vger.kernel.org
While describing the output format, the HOWTO says:
slat= [...] This
value can be in milliseconds or microseconds, fio will choose
the most appropriate base and print that. In the example
above, milliseconds is the best scale.
Does this apply to --minimal mode too?
--
Lucian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: units for latency in --minimal mode
2012-03-30 20:01 units for latency in --minimal mode Lucian Grijincu
@ 2012-03-31 23:28 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2012-03-31 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucian Grijincu; +Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
On 2012-03-30 13:01, Lucian Grijincu wrote:
> While describing the output format, the HOWTO says:
>
> slat= [...] This
> value can be in milliseconds or microseconds, fio will choose
> the most appropriate base and print that. In the example
> above, milliseconds is the best scale.
>
> Does this apply to --minimal mode too?
No, the minimal output is always in usecs. Feel free to send me a patch
to improve the HOWTO wording there, you are not the first to ask :-)
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-31 23:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-30 20:01 units for latency in --minimal mode Lucian Grijincu
2012-03-31 23:28 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox