From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Karthick Srinivasachary <karthick@pernixdata.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Repeat given pattern with buffer_compress_percentage
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5481EF86.3000900@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5481E959.8020402@kernel.dk>
On 12/05/2014 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/05/2014 10:02 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/05/2014 12:25 AM, Karthick Srinivasachary wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> Awesome.. Thanks for the fix..!
>>> With compress_percentage 80 or more, fio verify is failing. I don't
>>> think there any issue with storage in my test environment. Do you
>>> think we have a bug here. Complete command and output below.
>>>
>>> /usr/local/bin/fio --name=global --ioengine=libaio --bsrange=16k-64k
>>> --rw=randrw --iodepth=16 --direct=1 --verify=md5 --name=job0
>>> --size=100m --filename=/fio/fio.dat --rw=randrw --rate=20m
>>> --buffer_compress_percentage=80 --refill_buffers --buffer_pattern=123
>>> --verify_dump=1
>>
>> You can't do a random read/write test, it'll fail on the reads that have
>> not been populated. It might sometimes work if the file had been laid
>> out prior with the right contents, but generally you cannot depend upon
>> it. You want to do just --rw=randwrite and then the verify phase will
>> take place after the writes are done, verifying those.
>>
>> Try and delete fio.dat prior to running this job, and it should fail
>> consistently with or without buffer_compress_percentage.
>
> I take it back, there is a bug there. Fio does skip verifying the reads
> we generate initially, and verifies the written data after the
> read/write phase. So it _should_ work, the fact that it doesn't is a
> bug. I'll take a look at it.
Fixed, pull and retry please.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 18:48 Repeat given pattern with buffer_compress_percentage Karthick Srinivasachary
2014-12-03 19:45 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2014-12-03 19:49 ` Karthick Srinivasachary
2014-12-03 19:52 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2014-12-04 2:42 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-04 2:49 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-04 2:58 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-04 7:53 ` Karthick Srinivasachary
2014-12-04 15:27 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-04 22:41 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-05 7:25 ` Karthick Srinivasachary
2014-12-05 17:02 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-05 17:20 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-05 17:46 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-12-05 20:06 ` Karthick Srinivasachary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5481EF86.3000900@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthick@pernixdata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox