From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Caio Villela <caio@google.com>, Allen Schade <aschade@google.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Running a separate fio process for each disk?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:50:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564F798A.8050009@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFXh1QgZNghYY9CKJY5BZA4=ARGzXWYVHBBpHxV724qu2Wd5Hw@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/20/2015 12:37 PM, Caio Villela wrote:
> Hello Allen and Jens,
>
> Sorry for the long output, this is just in case you want the details.
> Here is a simple explanation for the problem. I want to run a 15 minute
> random write, using 1 Meg requests, and measure throughput and latency.
> What seems to be the problem is that if the test system has a large
> number of drives - the system that I am testing here has 28 drives -
> then the time accounting seems to go bad for some of the processes.
> What you see below is that during the 15 minutes from start, all disks
> are getting hit the same, as they should. Then, after 15 minutes, there
> are 15 drives that are still running.... after 5 minutes over the
> specified 15 minutes, there is still one drive running. Then looking at
> the amount of IOs sent to each drive, the ones that ran on that excess
> time have much more IOs. FIO still reports that all drives ran for 15
> minutes, although some ran for more than 20 minutes.
>
> We will attempt to run a single process instead of 28 instances of FIO
> to see if this goes away.
Could you also check if adding clocksource=gettimeofday makes any
difference? This sounds very odd.
Assuming this was run with fio -git?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-20 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CADp+U7ibiKciX8_cpzGzob4oL-UF-H+W7kYuiujovD0ba=hM6A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <56464ACC.9030605@kernel.dk>
2015-11-13 22:04 ` Running a separate fio process for each disk? Allen Schade
2015-11-13 22:06 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-20 18:28 ` Allen Schade
2015-11-20 19:37 ` Caio Villela
2015-11-20 19:50 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-11-20 22:20 ` Akash Verma
2015-11-21 0:03 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-21 0:21 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-24 15:51 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-24 20:51 ` Akash Verma
2015-11-25 1:18 ` Jens Axboe
2015-12-03 18:54 ` Akash Verma
2015-12-03 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564F798A.8050009@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=aschade@google.com \
--cc=caio@google.com \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox