Flexible I/O Tester development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Akash Verma <akashv@google.com>
Cc: Caio Villela <caio@google.com>, Allen Schade <aschade@google.com>,
	fio <fio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Running a separate fio process for each disk?
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:51:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5654876F.9080803@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564FB905.7060609@kernel.dk>

Did you try current -git yet? I think it should work for both scenarios. 
It's a silly bug, would be great to have confirmation that it's fixed. 
Then I'll spin a new release.


On 11/20/2015 05:21 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> And finally, there's a potential fix, if you run commit
> 99afcdb53dc3 or later. So please do try that as well, and
> see if that behaves any better for you.
>
>
> On 11/20/2015 05:03 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> OK, I see. Can you pull the latest -git, and then run fio
>> --cpuclock-test on one of the boxes where you see the issue? It should
>> have commit 5896d827e1e2 or later.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Akash Verma <akashv@google.com
>> <mailto:akashv@google.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Jens,
>>     The issue is not seen with non-cpu clock sources, or when using a
>>     single process (with individual threads, the only config I tried). We
>>     only see the issue when using multiple processes and the cpu clock
>>     source.
>>
>>     On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk
>>     <mailto:axboe@kernel.dk>> wrote:
>>      > On 11/20/2015 12:37 PM, Caio Villela wrote:
>>      >>
>>      >> Hello Allen and Jens,
>>      >>
>>      >> Sorry for the long output, this is just in case you want the
>>     details.
>>      >> Here is a simple explanation for the problem. I want to run a 15
>>     minute
>>      >> random write, using 1 Meg requests, and measure throughput and
>>     latency.
>>      >> What seems to be the problem is that if the test system has a
>> large
>>      >> number of drives - the system that I am testing here has 28
>> drives -
>>      >> then the time accounting seems to go bad for some of the
>> processes.
>>      >> What you see below is that during the 15 minutes from start, all
>>     disks
>>      >> are getting hit the same, as they should. Then, after 15
>>     minutes, there
>>      >> are 15 drives that are still running.... after 5 minutes over the
>>      >> specified 15 minutes, there is still one drive running. Then
>>     looking at
>>      >> the amount of IOs sent to each drive, the ones that ran on that
>>     excess
>>      >> time have much more IOs. FIO still reports that all drives ran
>>     for 15
>>      >> minutes, although some ran for more than 20 minutes.
>>      >>
>>      >> We will attempt to run a single process instead of 28 instances
>>     of FIO
>>      >> to see if this goes away.
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > Could you also check if adding clocksource=gettimeofday makes any
>>      > difference? This sounds very odd.
>>      >
>>      > Assuming this was run with fio -git?
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > --
>>      > Jens Axboe
>>      >
>>     > --
>>     > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
>>     > the body of a message tomajordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org>
>>     > More majordomo info athttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Jens Axboe



  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-24 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CADp+U7ibiKciX8_cpzGzob4oL-UF-H+W7kYuiujovD0ba=hM6A@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <56464ACC.9030605@kernel.dk>
2015-11-13 22:04   ` Running a separate fio process for each disk? Allen Schade
2015-11-13 22:06     ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-20 18:28       ` Allen Schade
2015-11-20 19:37         ` Caio Villela
2015-11-20 19:50           ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-20 22:20             ` Akash Verma
2015-11-21  0:03               ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-21  0:21                 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-24 15:51                   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-11-24 20:51                     ` Akash Verma
2015-11-25  1:18                       ` Jens Axboe
2015-12-03 18:54                         ` Akash Verma
2015-12-03 18:58                           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5654876F.9080803@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=akashv@google.com \
    --cc=aschade@google.com \
    --cc=caio@google.com \
    --cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox