public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: Fix installation for extended names
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:35:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160630153546.GI23649@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACj3i70ZOVyMiw9z0RJSDAgpWHgLGFSbBFD=xL9OZrV6XAca9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:19:53PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:35:10AM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> >> xfstests supports extended test names like 314-foo-bar, but installation of
> >> these tests was skipped (not matching a regexp). So this patch fixes the
> >> makefiles in tests directories.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> UPDATE:
> >>   * install failed when no extended name was present, so suppress errors for
> >>     extended names
> >
> > Hmm, this looks ugly to me :) I was thinking about it too, but didn't
> > work out a better idea. Now I tend to add this installation support to
> > tests/xfs/Makefile only, and we can add the support to other tests when
> > needed. What do you think?
> >
> 
> Yeah. I thought about better regexp, but unfortunately, whatever sh
> Make uses, it has just limited support for that, unlike bash. So, yes,
> add it for xfs tests only... Should I send another patch for that?

Yes, please. Thanks!

Eryu

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-30 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29 14:57 [PATCH] xfstests: Fix installation for extended names Jan Tulak
2016-06-30  3:38 ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-30  8:32   ` Jan Tulak
2016-06-30  8:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Tulak
2016-06-30 13:33   ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-30 15:19     ` Jan Tulak
2016-06-30 15:35       ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2016-06-30 16:06 ` [PATCH v3] xfstests: Fix installation for extended Jan Tulak
2016-06-30 16:08   ` Jan Tulak
2016-06-30 16:21     ` Eryu Guan
2016-07-01  1:16   ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-01 15:51     ` Jan Tulak
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-14 12:43 [PATCH 0/6 v3] xfstests: some small fixes and mkfs validation test Jan Tulak
2016-07-18  8:47 ` [PATCH v2] xfstests: Fix installation for extended names Jan Tulak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160630153546.GI23649@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jtulak@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox