* Re: [PATCH xfstests] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT [not found] <20161123222054.GA7900@fieldses.org> @ 2016-11-23 23:19 ` Andreas Dilger 2016-11-25 3:47 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andreas Dilger @ 2016-11-23 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: J. Bruce Fields; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, fstests, Linux NFS Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1934 bytes --] On Nov 23, 2016, at 3:20 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote: > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> > > In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result > in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail. > > This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS. > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> > --- > src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Sorry, who do xfstests patches go to?--b. They are sent to fstests@vger.kernel.org Cheers, Andreas > > diff --git a/src/dirstress.c b/src/dirstress.c > index f8f7355..33a166c 100644 > --- a/src/dirstress.c > +++ b/src/dirstress.c > @@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ dirstress( > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > error = chdir(".."); > if (error) { > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { > return 0; > } > > @@ -224,8 +226,10 @@ dirstress( > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > error = chdir(".."); > if (error) { > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.9.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Cheers, Andreas [-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH xfstests] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT 2016-11-23 23:19 ` [PATCH xfstests] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT Andreas Dilger @ 2016-11-25 3:47 ` J. Bruce Fields 2016-11-25 11:35 ` Eryu Guan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2016-11-25 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Dilger; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, fstests, Linux NFS Mailing List On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:19:11PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Nov 23, 2016, at 3:20 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote: > > > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> > > > > In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result > > in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail. > > > > This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS. > > > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> > > --- > > src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Sorry, who do xfstests patches go to?--b. > > They are sent to fstests@vger.kernel.org Thanks! Might be worth something like this too? --b. commit 0d61e7b9779d Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Date: Thu Nov 24 22:41:26 2016 -0500 Document fstests mailing list Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> diff --git a/README b/README index d1f6788a17a3..0a6ac6ece5aa 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -248,3 +248,9 @@ Pass/failure: The recent pass/fail history is maintained in the file "check.log". The elapsed time for the most recent pass for each test is kept in "check.time". + +__________________ +SUBMITTING PATCHES +__________________ + +Send patches to the fstests mailing list at fstests@vger.kernel.org. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH xfstests] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT 2016-11-25 3:47 ` J. Bruce Fields @ 2016-11-25 11:35 ` Eryu Guan 2016-11-26 1:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] Document fstests mailing list J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2016-11-25 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: J. Bruce Fields Cc: Andreas Dilger, linux-fsdevel, fstests, Linux NFS Mailing List Hi Bruce, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:47:06PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:19:11PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 3:20 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote: > > > > > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> > > > > > > In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result > > > in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail. > > > > > > This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > Sorry, who do xfstests patches go to?--b. > > > > They are sent to fstests@vger.kernel.org > > Thanks! > > Might be worth something like this too? This looks fine to me. Can you please resend as a formal patch? Also the patch to fix dirstress.c. Thanks, Eryu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] Document fstests mailing list 2016-11-25 11:35 ` Eryu Guan @ 2016-11-26 1:39 ` J. Bruce Fields 2016-11-26 1:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2016-11-26 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: Andreas Dilger, linux-fsdevel, fstests, Linux NFS Mailing List From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> --- README | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > This looks fine to me. Can you please resend as a formal patch? Also the > patch to fix dirstress.c. Sure, here you go.--b. diff --git a/README b/README index 8a362bd51f49..9f20884ecd37 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -243,3 +243,9 @@ Pass/failure: The recent pass/fail history is maintained in the file "check.log". The elapsed time for the most recent pass for each test is kept in "check.time". + +__________________ +SUBMITTING PATCHES +__________________ + +Send patches to the fstests mailing list at fstests@vger.kernel.org. -- 2.9.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT 2016-11-26 1:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] Document fstests mailing list J. Bruce Fields @ 2016-11-26 1:39 ` J. Bruce Fields 2016-11-29 6:43 ` Eryu Guan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2016-11-26 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: Andreas Dilger, linux-fsdevel, fstests, Linux NFS Mailing List From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail. This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> --- src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/dirstress.c b/src/dirstress.c index f8f73553a1bc..33a166c51819 100644 --- a/src/dirstress.c +++ b/src/dirstress.c @@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ dirstress( if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); error = chdir(".."); if (error) { - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { return 0; } @@ -224,8 +226,10 @@ dirstress( if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); error = chdir(".."); if (error) { - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { return 0; } -- 2.9.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT 2016-11-26 1:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT J. Bruce Fields @ 2016-11-29 6:43 ` Eryu Guan 2016-11-29 14:34 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eryu Guan @ 2016-11-29 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: J. Bruce Fields Cc: Andreas Dilger, linux-fsdevel, fstests, Linux NFS Mailing List On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:39:39PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> > > In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result > in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail. > > This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS. > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> > --- > src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/dirstress.c b/src/dirstress.c > index f8f73553a1bc..33a166c51819 100644 > --- a/src/dirstress.c > +++ b/src/dirstress.c > @@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ dirstress( > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > error = chdir(".."); > if (error) { > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { ^^^ this should be == > return 0; > } > > @@ -224,8 +226,10 @@ dirstress( > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > error = chdir(".."); > if (error) { > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { ^^^ same here I can fix them at commit time, no resend is needed. Thanks, Eryu > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.9.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT 2016-11-29 6:43 ` Eryu Guan @ 2016-11-29 14:34 ` J. Bruce Fields 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2016-11-29 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eryu Guan; +Cc: Andreas Dilger, linux-fsdevel, fstests, Linux NFS Mailing List On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 02:43:06PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:39:39PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com> > > > > In the NFS case an attempt to chdir out of a removed directory could result > > in ESTALE, and that should not cause the test to fail. > > > > This was causing intermittent failures on generic/011 on NFS. > > > > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> > > --- > > src/dirstress.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/dirstress.c b/src/dirstress.c > > index f8f73553a1bc..33a166c51819 100644 > > --- a/src/dirstress.c > > +++ b/src/dirstress.c > > @@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ dirstress( > > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > > error = chdir(".."); > > if (error) { > > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { > ^^^ this should be == > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -224,8 +226,10 @@ dirstress( > > if (verbose) fprintf(stderr,"** [%d] chdir ..\n", pid); > > error = chdir(".."); > > if (error) { > > - /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine */ > > - if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && errno == ENOENT) { > > + /* If this is multithreaded, then expecting a ENOENT here is fine, > > + * and ESTALE is normal in the NFS case. */ > > + if (nprocs_per_dir > 1 && > > + (errno == ENOENT || errno = ESTALE)) { > ^^^ same here > > I can fix them at commit time, no resend is needed. Oh, good grief. Thanks for catching that! I can confirm that my problem's still fixed with the corrected patch. --b. > > Thanks, > Eryu > > > return 0; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.9.3 > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-29 14:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20161123222054.GA7900@fieldses.org>
2016-11-23 23:19 ` [PATCH xfstests] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT Andreas Dilger
2016-11-25 3:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-11-25 11:35 ` Eryu Guan
2016-11-26 1:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] Document fstests mailing list J. Bruce Fields
2016-11-26 1:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] dirstress: Allow ESTALE as well as ENOENT J. Bruce Fields
2016-11-29 6:43 ` Eryu Guan
2016-11-29 14:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox