From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: eguan@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: trouble with generic/081
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:36:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161215063650.GJ4326@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161214164314.GA25105@infradead.org>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:43:14AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Eryu,
>
> I'm running into a fairly reproducable issue with generic/081
> (about every other run): For some reason the umount call in
> _cleanup doesn't do anything because it thinks the file system isn't
> mounted, but then vgremove complains that there is a mounted file
> system. This leads to the scratch device no being release and all
> subsequent tests failing.
Yup, been seeing that on my pmem test setup for months. Reported
along with the subsequent LVM configuration fuckup it resulted in:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2016-July/msg00405.html
> Here is the output if I let the commands in _cleanup print to stdout:
>
> QA output created by 081
> Silence is golden
> umount: /mnt/test/mnt_081: not mounted
> Logical volume vg_081/snap_081 contains a filesystem in use.
> PV /dev/sdc belongs to Volume Group vg_081 so please use vgreduce first.
>
> You added a comment in _cleanup that sais:
>
> # lvm may have umounted it on I/O error, but in case it does not
>
> Does LVM really unmount filesystems on it's own? Could we be racing
> with it?
Nope, I'm pretty sure it's a snapshot lifecycle issue - the snapshot
is still busy doing something (probably IO) for a short while after
we unmount, so LVM can't tear it down immediately like we ask. Wait
a few seconds, the snapshot work finishes, goes idle, and then it
can be torn down.
But if you consider the fuckup that occurs if generic/085 starts up
and tries to reconfigure LVM while the snapshot from generic/081 is
still in this whacky window (as reported in the above link), this is
really quite a nasty bug.
> With a "sleep 1" added before the umount call the test passes reliably
> for me, but that seems like papering over the issue.
Yup, same here. My local patch is this:
---
tests/generic/081 | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/generic/081 b/tests/generic/081
index 11755d4d89ff..ff33ffaa4fb8 100755
--- a/tests/generic/081
+++ b/tests/generic/081
@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ _cleanup()
rm -f $tmp.*
# lvm may have umounted it on I/O error, but in case it does not
$UMOUNT_PROG $mnt >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+ # on a pmem device, the vgremove/pvremove commands fail immediately
+ # after unmount. Wait a bit before removing them in the hope it
+ # succeeds.
+ sleep 5
$LVM_PROG vgremove -f $vgname >>$seqres.full 2>&1
$LVM_PROG pvremove -f $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seqres.full 2>&1
}
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-15 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-14 16:43 trouble with generic/081 Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-15 6:29 ` Eryu Guan
2016-12-15 6:36 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-12-15 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-15 9:16 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-12-16 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-04 23:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-05 10:35 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-01-05 16:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-05 17:42 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-01-05 18:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-01-05 18:40 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161215063650.GJ4326@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox