* [PATCH] xfs: test mkfs extent size hint validation
[not found] <20190216003923.GV32253@magnolia>
@ 2019-02-16 0:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-17 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2019-02-16 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs, fstests, Eryu Guan
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Make sure mkfs won't format filesystems that fail extent size hint
validation.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
tests/xfs/738 | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/xfs/738.out | 2 ++
tests/xfs/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/xfs/738
create mode 100644 tests/xfs/738.out
diff --git a/tests/xfs/738 b/tests/xfs/738
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..ee0ffaae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/738
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+# Copyright (c) 2019 Oracle, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test No. 738
+#
+# Make sure we can't format a filesystem with insane extent hints.
+#
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1 # failure is the default!
+testfile=$TEST_DIR/$seq.txt
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ cd /
+ rm -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_fs xfs
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_scratch_nocheck
+
+rm -f $seqres.full
+
+# Try regular extent size hint
+echo extszinherit >> $seqres.full
+_scratch_mkfs -d extszinherit=8388608 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
+test $? -eq 1 || echo "should have failed extszinherit"
+
+# Try cow extent size hint if supported
+$MKFS_XFS_PROG -N -f $SCRATCH_DEV > $tmp.mkfs
+if grep -q 'reflink=' $tmp.mkfs ; then
+ echo cowextsize >> $seqres.full
+ _scratch_mkfs -m reflink=1 -d cowextsize=8388608 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
+ test $? -eq 1 || echo "should have failed cowextsize"
+fi
+
+echo silence is golden
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/xfs/738.out b/tests/xfs/738.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..703fe23b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/738.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 738
+silence is golden
diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
index 677396fb..b2fea9ef 100644
--- a/tests/xfs/group
+++ b/tests/xfs/group
@@ -515,6 +515,7 @@
731 dangerous_scrub dangerous_online_repair
736 auto quick unlink
737 auto quick unlink
+738 auto quick
1500 auto prealloc rw
1501 auto prealloc rw
1502 auto prealloc rw
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: test mkfs extent size hint validation
2019-02-16 0:41 ` [PATCH] xfs: test mkfs extent size hint validation Darrick J. Wong
@ 2019-02-17 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-18 18:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2019-02-17 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs, fstests, Eryu Guan
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:41:19PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> Make sure mkfs won't format filesystems that fail extent size hint
> validation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> tests/xfs/738 | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/738.out | 2 ++
> tests/xfs/group | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/738
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/738.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/738 b/tests/xfs/738
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..ee0ffaae
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/738
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +# Copyright (c) 2019 Oracle, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 738
> +#
> +# Make sure we can't format a filesystem with insane extent hints.
> +#
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +testfile=$TEST_DIR/$seq.txt
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + cd /
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch_nocheck
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# Try regular extent size hint
> +echo extszinherit >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mkfs -d extszinherit=8388608 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +test $? -eq 1 || echo "should have failed extszinherit"
That won't fail on 64k block size filesystems....
> +# Try cow extent size hint if supported
> +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -N -f $SCRATCH_DEV > $tmp.mkfs
> +if grep -q 'reflink=' $tmp.mkfs ; then
That's testing mkfs for reflink support, yes? i.e.
_scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m crc=1,reflink=1
[ need to explicitly say -m crc=1 here, because MKFS_OPTIONS might
have -m crc=0, right? ]
> --- a/tests/xfs/group
> +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@
> 731 dangerous_scrub dangerous_online_repair
> 736 auto quick unlink
> 737 auto quick unlink
> +738 auto quick
prealloc, too. And maybe mkfs?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: test mkfs extent size hint validation
2019-02-17 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2019-02-18 18:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18 21:17 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2019-02-18 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs, fstests, Eryu Guan
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:07:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:41:19PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > Make sure mkfs won't format filesystems that fail extent size hint
> > validation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > tests/xfs/738 | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/xfs/738.out | 2 ++
> > tests/xfs/group | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/738
> > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/738.out
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/738 b/tests/xfs/738
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..ee0ffaae
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/738
> > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +# Copyright (c) 2019 Oracle, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test No. 738
> > +#
> > +# Make sure we can't format a filesystem with insane extent hints.
> > +#
> > +seq=`basename $0`
> > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > +status=1 # failure is the default!
> > +testfile=$TEST_DIR/$seq.txt
> > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > + cd /
> > + rm -f $tmp.*
> > +}
> > +
> > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> > +. ./common/rc
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +_supported_fs xfs
> > +_supported_os Linux
> > +_require_scratch_nocheck
> > +
> > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > +
> > +# Try regular extent size hint
> > +echo extszinherit >> $seqres.full
> > +_scratch_mkfs -d extszinherit=8388608 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > +test $? -eq 1 || echo "should have failed extszinherit"
>
> That won't fail on 64k block size filesystems....
The extzinherit parameter is copied directly into the root inode without
any unit conversion (dopts[D_EXTSZINHERIT].convert == false), which
means that it's specified in units of fs blocks, right? So then the
only constraints are that the value < MAXEXTLEN and value < agsize/2,
which means that block size shouldn't matter.
> > +# Try cow extent size hint if supported
> > +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -N -f $SCRATCH_DEV > $tmp.mkfs
> > +if grep -q 'reflink=' $tmp.mkfs ; then
>
> That's testing mkfs for reflink support, yes? i.e.
>
> _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m crc=1,reflink=1
Ok.
> [ need to explicitly say -m crc=1 here, because MKFS_OPTIONS might
> have -m crc=0, right? ]
>
> > --- a/tests/xfs/group
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> > @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@
> > 731 dangerous_scrub dangerous_online_repair
> > 736 auto quick unlink
> > 737 auto quick unlink
> > +738 auto quick
>
> prealloc, too. And maybe mkfs?
Will fix the last two; thanks for the review.
--D
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: test mkfs extent size hint validation
2019-02-18 18:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2019-02-18 21:17 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2019-02-18 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs, fstests, Eryu Guan
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:03:34AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:07:16AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:41:19PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > >
> > > Make sure mkfs won't format filesystems that fail extent size hint
> > > validation.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/xfs/738 | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/xfs/738.out | 2 ++
> > > tests/xfs/group | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100755 tests/xfs/738
> > > create mode 100644 tests/xfs/738.out
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/738 b/tests/xfs/738
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 00000000..ee0ffaae
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/738
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > +# Copyright (c) 2019 Oracle, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > > +#
> > > +# FS QA Test No. 738
> > > +#
> > > +# Make sure we can't format a filesystem with insane extent hints.
> > > +#
> > > +seq=`basename $0`
> > > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> > > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> > > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > > +status=1 # failure is the default!
> > > +testfile=$TEST_DIR/$seq.txt
> > > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > > +
> > > +_cleanup()
> > > +{
> > > + cd /
> > > + rm -f $tmp.*
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> > > +. ./common/rc
> > > +
> > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > +_supported_fs xfs
> > > +_supported_os Linux
> > > +_require_scratch_nocheck
> > > +
> > > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > > +
> > > +# Try regular extent size hint
> > > +echo extszinherit >> $seqres.full
> > > +_scratch_mkfs -d extszinherit=8388608 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +test $? -eq 1 || echo "should have failed extszinherit"
> >
> > That won't fail on 64k block size filesystems....
>
> The extzinherit parameter is copied directly into the root inode without
> any unit conversion (dopts[D_EXTSZINHERIT].convert == false), which
> means that it's specified in units of fs blocks, right? So then the
> only constraints are that the value < MAXEXTLEN and value < agsize/2,
> which means that block size shouldn't matter.
Ah, good point. I read it as 8GB, not 8M blocks.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-18 21:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190216003923.GV32253@magnolia>
2019-02-16 0:41 ` [PATCH] xfs: test mkfs extent size hint validation Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-17 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-18 18:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-02-18 21:17 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox