From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] fstests: copy_file_range() tests
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:55:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715125516.7367-1-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
Eryu,
These are the two remaining copy_file_range() tests which
I used to verify the kernel fixes that are now in master [1].
The bounds check test depends on an xfs_io change that was merged to
xfsprogs v5.1.0-rc1 (copy_range -f).
The cross-device copy test checks a new functionality, so it does
_notrun if copy_range return EXDEV instead of failing.
Thanks,
Amir.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190709163947.GE5164@magnolia/
Changes from v3:
- swapfile and immutable file tests already merged (generic/55[34])
- Use an actual loopdev owned by this test
- Use /dev/null and /dev/zero and char devices for test
- _notrun if cross-device copy_range return EXDEV
Changes from v2:
- Change blockdev in test to loop and _require_loop (Olga)
- Implement and use _require_xfs_io_command copy_range -f
Changes from v1:
- Remove patch to test EINVAL behavior instead of short copy
- Remove 'chmod -r' permission drop test case
- Split out test for swap/immutable file copy
- Split of cross-device copy test
Amir Goldstein (3):
common/rc: check support for xfs_io copy_range -f N
generic: copy_file_range bounds test
generic: cross-device copy_file_range test
common/rc | 9 ++-
tests/generic/990 | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/generic/990.out | 37 ++++++++++++
tests/generic/991 | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++
tests/generic/991.out | 4 ++
tests/generic/group | 2 +
6 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100755 tests/generic/990
create mode 100644 tests/generic/990.out
create mode 100755 tests/generic/991
create mode 100644 tests/generic/991.out
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-15 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-15 12:55 Amir Goldstein [this message]
2019-07-15 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] common/rc: check support for xfs_io copy_range -f N Amir Goldstein
2019-07-15 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] generic: copy_file_range bounds test Amir Goldstein
2019-07-21 16:43 ` Eryu Guan
2019-07-15 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] generic: cross-device copy_file_range test Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190715125516.7367-1-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox