From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/70: Use scratch device instead of test.
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 23:00:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210819150050.jweulrtgjeh57wac@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210819131355.304528-1-nborisov@suse.com>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 04:13:55PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> At the end of the test the fsstress work dir is deleted, this suggests
> the test really requires a scratch device and not a test device. Change
> it accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
Hmm... is there any more specific reasons to explain why have to change this
TEST_DIR to SCRATCH_MNT? For example, this test hit ENOSPC in TEST_DIR, or
it takes too much time to remove $TEST_DIR/fsstress in _cleanup, or use
SCRATCH_DEV can cover more things, and so on. I think more specific reason
can help to push this patch be merged. After all there's not a rule says
if a case don't need to keep its work dir, then must use SCRATCH_DEV. Except
the maintainer is more inclined to accept that :)
Thanks,
Zorro
> tests/generic/070 | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/070 b/tests/generic/070
> index 678344fa011d..c98f445ae4b8 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/070
> +++ b/tests/generic/070
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ _begin_fstest attr udf auto quick stress
> _cleanup()
> {
> cd /
> - rm -rf $TEST_DIR/fsstress
> rm -f $tmp.*
> }
>
> @@ -24,11 +23,14 @@ _cleanup()
> # real QA test starts here
> _supported_fs generic
>
> -_require_test
> +_require_scratch
> _require_attrs
>
> +_scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> FSSTRESS_ARGS=`_scale_fsstress_args \
> - -d $TEST_DIR/fsstress \
> + -d $SCRATCH_MNT \
> -f allocsp=0 \
> -f freesp=0 \
> -f bulkstat=0 \
> @@ -40,5 +42,7 @@ FSSTRESS_ARGS=`_scale_fsstress_args \
> -p 1 -n 10000 -S c`
> $FSSTRESS_PROG $FSSTRESS_ARGS >$seqres.full 2>&1
>
> +_scratch_unmount
> +
> status=$?
> exit
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-19 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-19 13:13 [PATCH] generic/70: Use scratch device instead of test Nikolay Borisov
2021-08-19 15:00 ` Zorro Lang [this message]
2021-08-19 14:56 ` Nikolay Borisov
2021-08-19 19:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-08-21 22:58 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210819150050.jweulrtgjeh57wac@fedora \
--to=zlang@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox