From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, zlang@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] xfs: test mkfs.xfs sizing of internal logs that
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:18:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220629041807.GP1098723@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <165644769450.1045534.8663346508633304230.stgit@magnolia>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 01:21:34PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> This is a regression test that exercises the mkfs.xfs code that creates
> log sizes that are very close to the AG size when stripe units are in
> play and/or when the log is forced to be in AG 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
> tests/xfs/843 | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/843.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/843
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/843.out
>
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/843 b/tests/xfs/843
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..5bb4bfb4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/843
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2022 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 843
> +#
> +# Now that we've increased the default log size calculation, test mkfs with
> +# various stripe units and filesystem sizes to see if we can provoke mkfs into
> +# breaking.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto mkfs
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs xfs
> +_require_test
> +echo Silence is golden
> +
> +testfile=$TEST_DIR/a
> +rm -f $testfile
> +
> +test_format() {
> + local tag="$1"
> + shift
> +
> + echo "$tag" >> $seqres.full
> + $MKFS_XFS_PROG $@ -d file,name=$testfile &>> $seqres.full
> + local res=$?
> + test $res -eq 0 || echo "$tag FAIL $res" | tee -a $seqres.full
> +}
> +
> +# First we try various small filesystems and stripe sizes.
> +for M in `seq 298 302` `seq 490 520`; do
> + for S in `seq 32 4 64`; do
> + test_format "M=$M S=$S" -dsu=${S}k,sw=1,size=${M}m -N
> + done
> +done
> +
> +# Log so large it pushes the root dir into AG 1. We can't use -N for the mkfs
> +# because this check only occurs after the root directory has been allocated,
> +# which mkfs -N doesn't do.
> +test_format "log pushes rootdir into AG 1" -d agcount=3200,size=6366g -lagnum=0 -N
Why are you passing "-N" to the test if it can't be used to test
this?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 20:21 [PATCHSET 0/9] fstests: random fixes Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 1/9] seek_sanity_test: fix allocation unit detection on XFS realtime Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-28 1:37 ` liuyd.fnst
2022-07-28 2:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-28 2:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-28 3:38 ` liuyd.fnst
2022-07-28 3:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs/070: filter new superblock verifier messages Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 4:15 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 9:12 ` Zorro Lang
2022-06-29 22:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-30 2:18 ` Zorro Lang
2022-06-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: test mkfs.xfs sizing of internal logs that Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 4:18 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-06-29 22:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-30 6:37 ` Zorro Lang
2022-06-30 19:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: test xfs_copy doesn't do cached read before libxfs_mount Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-29 22:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-30 0:48 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-01 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 5/9] check: document mkfs.xfs reliance on fstests exports Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 4:22 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs/109: handle larger minimum filesystem size Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 4:22 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs/018: fix LARP testing for small block sizes Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-28 20:22 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs/166: fix golden output failures when multipage folios enabled Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-29 4:23 ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-28 20:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs/547: fix problems with realtime Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-05 14:28 ` [PATCHSET 0/9] fstests: random fixes Zorro Lang
2022-07-05 22:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220629041807.GP1098723@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox