FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
To: An Long <lan@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] btrfs/011: use $_btrfs_profile_configs to limit the tests
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:49:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230120124939.6441a073@echidna.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230114031909.8294-1-lan@suse.com>

Hi,

On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 11:19:09 +0800, An Long wrote:

> Generally the tester need BTRFS_PROFILE_CONFIGS to test certain
> profiles. For example, skip raid56 as it's not supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: An Long <lan@suse.com>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/011 | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/011 b/tests/btrfs/011
> index 6c3d037f..ac45e735 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/011
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/011
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ _require_scratch_dev_pool 5
>  _require_scratch_dev_pool_equal_size
>  _require_scratch_size $((10 * 1024 * 1024)) #kB
>  _require_command "$WIPEFS_PROG" wipefs
> +_btrfs_get_profile_configs
>  
>  rm -f $tmp.*
>  
> @@ -237,18 +238,27 @@ btrfs_replace_test()
>  	fi
>  }
>  
> -workout "-m single -d single" 1 no 64
> +if [[ "${_btrfs_profile_configs[@]}" =~ "-m single -d single"( |$) ]]; then
> +	workout "-m single -d single" 1 no 64
> +fi
> +
>  # Mixed BG & RAID/DUP profiles are not supported on zoned btrfs
>  if ! _scratch_btrfs_is_zoned; then
> -	workout "-m dup -d single" 1 no 64
> -	workout "-m dup -d single" 1 cancel 1024
> -	workout "-m raid0 -d raid0" 2 no 64
> -	workout "-m raid1 -d raid1" 2 no 2048
> -	workout "-m raid10 -d raid10" 4 no 64
> -	workout "-m single -d single -M" 1 no 64
> -	workout "-m dup -d dup -M" 1 no 64
> -	workout "-m raid5 -d raid5" 2 no 64
> -	workout "-m raid6 -d raid6" 3 no 64
> +	for t in "-m dup -d single:1 no 64" \
> +		"-m dup -d single:1 cancel 1024" \
> +		"-m raid0 -d raid0:2 no 64" \
> +		"-m raid1 -d raid1:2 no 2048" \
> +		"-m raid10 -d raid10:4 no 64" \
> +		"-m single -d single -M:1 no 64" \
> +		"-m dup -d dup -M:1 no 64" \

This dup/dup case no longer gets run with a default
_btrfs_profile_configs[]. Is that intentional?

Cheers, David

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-10 17:22 [PATCH] btrfs/011: use $_btrfs_profile_configs to limit the tests An Long
2023-01-11 12:18 ` David Disseldorp
2023-01-13 16:35   ` [PATCH v2] " An Long
2023-01-13 18:40     ` Zorro Lang
2023-01-14  3:12   ` [PATCH v3] " An Long
2023-01-14  3:19   ` [PATCH v4] " An Long
2023-01-20 11:49     ` David Disseldorp [this message]
2023-01-20 15:59       ` Long An
2023-01-20 17:19         ` David Disseldorp
2023-02-14 15:30   ` [PATCH v5] " An Long
2023-02-14 21:07     ` David Disseldorp
2023-02-15  5:12       ` Long An
2023-02-15  5:13   ` [PATCH v6] " An Long
2023-02-16 14:55     ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230120124939.6441a073@echidna.fritz.box \
    --to=ddiss@suse.de \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lan@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox