From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
john.g.garry@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/12] generic/767: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 07:42:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250611144225.GI6143@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cb914eacd9d7825f2903410948d2a1d4a1a8800.1749629233.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:04:47PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>
> This adds atomic write test using fio based on it's crc check verifier.
> fio adds a crc for each data block. If the underlying device supports atomic
> write then it is guaranteed that we will never have a mix data from two
> threads writing on the same physical block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/generic/767 | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/767.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/767
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/767.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/767 b/tests/generic/767
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..4f80e7b6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/767
> @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2025 IBM Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 767
> +#
> +# Validate FS atomic write using fio crc check verifier.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +. ./common/atomicwrites
> +
> +_begin_fstest auto aio rw atomicwrites
> +
> +_require_scratch_write_atomic
> +_require_odirect
> +_require_aio
> +
> +function max()
> +{
> + if (( $1 > $2 )); then
> + echo "$1"
> + else
> + echo "$2"
> + fi
> +}
> +
> +function min()
> +{
> + if (( $1 > $2 )); then
> + echo "$2"
> + else
> + echo "$1"
> + fi
> +}
Should these be common/rc helpers?
Or, since bash is ... uh fun with arguments...
_min() {
local ret
for arg in "$@"; do
if [ -z "$ret" ] || (( $arg < $ret )); then
ret="$arg"
fi
done
echo $ret
}
and then you can pass as many arguments as you like. The only downside
is that you can pass stringly typed crap "_min cow frog" and it still
returns "cow". As if.
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +touch "$SCRATCH_MNT/f1"
> +awu_min_write=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_min "$SCRATCH_MNT/f1")
> +awu_max_write=$(_get_atomic_write_unit_max "$SCRATCH_MNT/f1")
> +blocksize=$(max "$awu_min_write" "$((awu_max_write/2))")
> +
> +# XFS can have high awu_max_write due to software fallback. Cap it at 64k
> +blocksize=$(min "$blocksize" "65536")
> +
> +fio_config=$tmp.fio
> +fio_out=$tmp.fio.out
> +
> +FIO_LOAD=$(($(nproc) * 2 * LOAD_FACTOR))
What program is nproc?
--D
> +SIZE=$((100 * 1024 * 1024))
> +
> +cat >$fio_config <<EOF
> +[aio-dio-aw-verify]
> +direct=1
> +ioengine=libaio
> +rw=randwrite
> +bs=$blocksize
> +fallocate=native
> +filename=$SCRATCH_MNT/test-file
> +size=$SIZE
> +iodepth=$FIO_LOAD
> +numjobs=$FIO_LOAD
> +group_reporting=1
> +verify_state_save=0
> +verify=crc32c
> +verify_fatal=1
> +verify_dump=0
> +verify_backlog=1024
> +verify_async=4
> +verify_write_sequence=0
> +atomic=1
> +EOF
> +
> +_require_fio $fio_config
> +
> +cat $fio_config >> $seqres.full
> +$FIO_PROG $fio_config --output=$fio_out
> +cat $fio_out >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo Silence is golden
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/767.out b/tests/generic/767.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..2bf7f989
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/767.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 767
> +Silence is golden
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 9:34 [RFC 00/12] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 01/12] common/preamble: Fix fsx for ext4 with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 14:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 6:11 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-12 14:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-13 5:31 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-13 15:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-17 6:22 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-30 15:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-18 19:13 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-20 6:21 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-20 9:59 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 02/12] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 14:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 6:17 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-12 14:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 03/12] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 14:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 6:18 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 04/12] generic/767: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 14:42 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-06-12 6:22 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-12 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-18 19:34 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-20 7:06 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 05/12] generic/769: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 15:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 06/12] generic/770: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 15:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 6:23 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-18 20:17 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-20 8:20 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-20 12:12 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 07/12] generic/771: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 14:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 6:27 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-12 15:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-13 5:20 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-18 20:27 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-20 8:26 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 08/12] generic/772: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 15:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-12 6:28 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-19 7:15 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-20 11:11 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-20 14:05 ` John Garry
2025-06-20 15:24 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 09/12] ext4/061: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-19 7:43 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-20 15:08 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-20 16:53 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 10/12] ext4/062: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-12 10:26 ` John Garry
2025-06-13 5:37 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-20 14:01 ` John Garry
2025-06-20 16:49 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-19 7:45 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 11/12] ext4/063: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-19 7:52 ` Zorro Lang
2025-06-11 9:34 ` [RFC 12/12] ext4/064: Add atomic write tests for journal credit calculation Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-06-19 7:58 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250611144225.GI6143@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox