FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	djwong@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 10:24:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4572fcd8-6364-4827-af9b-d11728c39c78@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKbb2XhcsMMhBlgb@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>

On 21/08/2025 09:42, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 02:39:40PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> On 10/08/2025 14:41, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
>>> This adds atomic write test using fio based on it's crc check verifier.
>>> fio adds a crc for each data block. If the underlying device supports
>>> atomic write then it is guaranteed that we will never have a mix data from
>>> two threads writing on the same physical block.
>>>
>>> Avoid doing overlapping parallel atomic writes because it might give
>>> unexpected results. Use offset_increment=, size= fio options to achieve
>>> this behavior.
>>>
>> You are not really describing what the test does.
>>
>> In the first paragraph, you state what fio verify function does and then
>> describe what RWF_ATOMIC means when we only use HW support, i.e. serialises.
>> In the second you mention that we guarantee no inter-thread overlapping
>> writes.
> Got it John, I will add better commit messages for the fio tests.
>>  From a glance at the code below, in this test each thread writes to a
>> separate part of the file and then verifies no crc corruption. But even with
>> atomic=0, I would expect no corruption here.
> Right, this is mostly a stress test that is ensuring that all the new
> atomic write code paths are not causing anything to break or
> introducing any regressions. This should pass with both atomic or non
> atomic writes but by using RWF_ATOMIC we excercise the atomic specific
> code paths, improving the code coverage.

I am not sure really how much value this has. At least it should be 
documented what we are doing here and what value there is in this test.

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-21  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-10 13:41 [PATCH v4 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 12:20   ` David Laight
2025-08-21 10:35     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:42   ` John Garry
2025-08-21  9:45     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13 13:39   ` John Garry
2025-08-21  8:42     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21  9:24       ` John Garry [this message]
2025-08-21 12:18         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-11 15:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13  5:45     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] ext4: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12  8:08   ` John Garry
2025-08-13  7:08     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13  7:33       ` John Garry
2025-08-21  8:29         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] ext4: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:45   ` John Garry
2025-08-21  8:28     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21  9:28       ` John Garry
2025-08-21 12:19         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13  5:45     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:54   ` John Garry
2025-08-21  8:25     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21  9:23       ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4572fcd8-6364-4827-af9b-d11728c39c78@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox