From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
djwong@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] ext4: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:45:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c4824a6-8922-470d-915c-e783a4e0e9cc@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48873bdce79f491b8b8948680afe041831af08cd.1754833177.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/08/2025 14:42, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)"<ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>
> Brute force all possible blocksize clustersize combination on a bigalloc
> filesystem for stressing atomic write using fio data crc verifier. We run
> multiple threads in parallel with each job writing to its own file. The
> parallel jobs running on a constrained filesystem size ensure that we
> stress the ext4 allocator to allocate contiguous extents.
>
> This test might do overlapping atomic writes but that should be okay
> since overlapping parallel hardware atomic writes don't cause tearing as
> long as io size is the same for all writes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM)<ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong<djwong@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo<ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/ext4/062 | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/ext4/062.out | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 178 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/ext4/062
> create mode 100644 tests/ext4/062.out
Is the only difference to 061 that we have multiple files (and not a
single file)?
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-10 13:41 [PATCH v4 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 12:20 ` David Laight
2025-08-21 10:35 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:42 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 9:45 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13 13:39 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 8:42 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21 9:24 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 12:18 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-11 15:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13 5:45 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] ext4: Atomic writes stress test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 8:08 ` John Garry
2025-08-13 7:08 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 7:33 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 8:29 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] ext4: Atomic writes test for bigalloc using fio crc verifier on multiple files Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:45 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-08-21 8:28 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21 9:28 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 12:19 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-12 17:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13 5:45 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-13 13:54 ` John Garry
2025-08-21 8:25 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-08-21 9:23 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c4824a6-8922-470d-915c-e783a4e0e9cc@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox