FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] check: more tests that shouldn't check the scratch device
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:27:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54190DAB.3020500@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410918113-23516-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On 9/16/14 8:41 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> xfs/200 leaves a dirty log as readonly filesystems don't write
> unmount records to mark the log clean.

I wonder if it'd be better to just add a case that sets it RW again
and mounts/unmounts it, so we *can* check it after these gyrations?

But if for some reason you don't want to change the existing test,
this is probably ok too; if so,

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/200 | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/200 b/tests/xfs/200
> index f4db64f..f0c4337 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/200
> +++ b/tests/xfs/200
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>  _supported_fs xfs
>  _supported_os Linux
>  
> -_require_scratch
> +_require_scratch_nocheck
>  
>  _scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null 2>&1
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-17  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-17  1:41 [PATCH 0/5] xfstests: cleanups and new tests Dave Chinner
2014-09-17  1:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] generic: more tests should clean up TESTDIR on success Dave Chinner
2014-09-17  4:17   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-09-17  1:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] check: more tests that shouldn't check the scratch device Dave Chinner
2014-09-17  4:27   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-09-17  1:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] generic: add mmap write vs truncate test Dave Chinner
2014-09-19 19:38   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-09-17  1:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] generic: add mmap write vs truncate/remap test Dave Chinner
2014-09-17  4:32   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-09-17  4:51     ` Dave Chinner
2014-09-19 19:35   ` [PATCH 4.5/5] generic: tidy up " Eric Sandeen
2014-09-19 19:35   ` [PATCH 4/5] generic: add " Eric Sandeen
2014-09-20  0:17   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-09-20 23:32     ` Dave Chinner
2014-09-17  1:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] generic: add write vs fcollapse test Dave Chinner
2014-09-17 12:40   ` Brian Foster
2014-09-18  1:33     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54190DAB.3020500@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox