FS/XFS testing framework
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs: Add regression test for reserved space leak.
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:04:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C18B67.2010300@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150805031056.GB3902@dastard>

On 2015/08/05 12:10, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:52:36AM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
>> On 2015/08/05 10:57, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:39:35AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> Tsutomu Itoh wrote on 2015/08/05 10:26 +0900:
>>>>> On 2015/08/05 10:08, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>>> +# As the reserved space freeing happens at commit_transaction time,
>>>>>> +# without a transaction commit, no reserved space needs freeing and
>>>>>> +# won't trigger the bug.
>>>>>> +sync
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't '$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync' better instead of 'sync'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Tsutomu
>>>> Hi, Tsutomu-san,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I did use such method before, but Dave said it's better to use
>>>> unified interface to sync a filesystem other than the specialized
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> So I still use sync as Dave said.
>>>
>>> Mainly because "sync" is what users will use to make sure their data
>>> is safe. filesystem specific tools have a habit of doing "special
>>> stuff" to sync a filesystem, so it may not reflect the way users
>>> expect the system to behaviour when they run sync.
>>>
>>> The other option is this:
>>>
>>> _syncfs()
>>> {
>>> 	mntpt=$1
>>>
>>> 	$XFS_IO_PROG -c syncfs $mntpt
>>> }
>>>
>>> _sync_test()
>>> {
>>> 	_syncfs $TEST_DIR
>>> }
>>>
>>> _sync_scratch()
>>> {
>>> 	_syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT
>>> }
>>>
>>> which only runs sync on the filesystem that needs syncing (via the
>>> syncfs() syscall)
>>
>> I think that syncfs is better instead of sync because the syncing of
>> the specified filesystem is necessary.
>
> sync guarantees that. IOWs, there's no difference between sync and
> syncfs for the persepctive of this test and so the test does not
> need really need changing.

I agree that sync and syncfs is not different for this test.

However, sync is syncing of all filesystems, and, syncfs is syncing
of the specified filesystem only.
Therefor, I think that it is better to use sync and syncfs properly
according to the necessity.

Thanks,
Tsutomu



  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-05  4:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-05  1:08 [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs: Add regression test for reserved space leak Qu Wenruo
2015-08-05  1:26 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2015-08-05  1:39   ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-05  1:57     ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-05  2:52       ` Tsutomu Itoh
2015-08-05  2:59         ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-05  3:10         ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-05  4:04           ` Tsutomu Itoh [this message]
2015-08-05  7:46 ` Filipe David Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C18B67.2010300@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox