* [PATCH] btrfs/295: skip on zoned device as we cannot corrupt it directly
@ 2023-09-26 14:11 Naohiro Aota
2023-09-26 14:27 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Naohiro Aota @ 2023-09-26 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fstests; +Cc: linux-btrfs, Naohiro Aota
We use _pwrite_byte to corrupt the root node, but such overwrite won't work
on a sequential write required zone. So, skip the test on a zoned device.
Technically, we can run this test case by checking if the physical location
lands in a conventional zone. But, the logic should be no difference than
the regular mode and I don't think it's worth doing so.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
---
tests/btrfs/295 | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/295 b/tests/btrfs/295
index a9a8e5530a80..00a5c5680b86 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/295
+++ b/tests/btrfs/295
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ _begin_fstest auto quick dangerous
. ./common/filter
_supported_fs btrfs
_require_scratch
+# Directly writing to the device, which may not work with a zoned device
+_require_non_zoned_device "$SCRATCH_DEV"
# Use single metadata profile so we only need to corrupt one copy of tree block
_scratch_mkfs -m single > $seqres.full
--
2.42.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs/295: skip on zoned device as we cannot corrupt it directly
2023-09-26 14:11 [PATCH] btrfs/295: skip on zoned device as we cannot corrupt it directly Naohiro Aota
@ 2023-09-26 14:27 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2023-09-26 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naohiro Aota, fstests; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 26/09/2023 22:11, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> We use _pwrite_byte to corrupt the root node, but such overwrite won't work
> on a sequential write required zone. So, skip the test on a zoned device.
>
> Technically, we can run this test case by checking if the physical location
> lands in a conventional zone. But, the logic should be no difference than
> the regular mode and I don't think it's worth doing so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/295 | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/295 b/tests/btrfs/295
> index a9a8e5530a80..00a5c5680b86 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/295
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/295
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ _begin_fstest auto quick dangerous
> . ./common/filter
> _supported_fs btrfs
> _require_scratch
> +# Directly writing to the device, which may not work with a zoned device
> +_require_non_zoned_device "$SCRATCH_DEV"
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>
> # Use single metadata profile so we only need to corrupt one copy of tree block
> _scratch_mkfs -m single > $seqres.full
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-26 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-26 14:11 [PATCH] btrfs/295: skip on zoned device as we cannot corrupt it directly Naohiro Aota
2023-09-26 14:27 ` Anand Jain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox