[PATCH v2 0/3] more lbs test fixes

[PATCH v2 0/3] more lbs test fixes

[Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)]

From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

These are some of the tests that failed when we were working on LBS
patches [1].

generic/436 and xfs/008 are adapted to work with bs > ps systems.

xfs/161 is an upstream failure, and it happens even on bs <= ps systems.

Changes since v1:
- Corrected copy pasta error in generic/436
- xfs/161 removed hardcoded and incorporated ritesh's comments

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240503095353.3798063-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/

Pankaj Raghav (3):
  xfs/161: adapt the test case for 64k FS blocksize
  generic/436: round up bufsz to nearest filesystem blksz
  xfs/008: use block size instead of the pagesize

 src/seek_sanity_test.c |  8 ++++----
 tests/xfs/008          | 19 ++++++++++---------
 tests/xfs/008.out      |  8 ++++----
 tests/xfs/161          | 16 ++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)


base-commit: b26d68da08e47e6508a96bee72b25823040ab67e
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 1/3] xfs/161: adapt the test case for 64k FS blocksize

[Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)]

From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

This test fails when xfs is formatted with 64k filesystem block size*.
It fails because the soft quota is not exceeded with the hardcoded 64k
pwrite, thereby, the grace time is not set. Even though soft quota is
set to 12k for uid1, it is rounded up to the nearest blocksize.

*** Report for user quotas on device /dev/sdb3
Block grace time: 7days; Inode grace time: 7days
                        Block limits                File limits
User            used    soft    hard  grace    used  soft  hard  grace
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0        --       0       0       0      0       3     0     0      0
1        --      64      64    1024      0       1     0     0      0
2        --      64       0       0      0       1     0     0      0

Adapt the pwrite to do twice the FS block size and set the soft limit
to be 1 FS block and hard limit to be 100 FS blocks. This also gets rid
of harcoded quota limit values.

* This happens even on a 64k pagesize system and it is not related to
  LBS effort.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
 tests/xfs/161 | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/xfs/161 b/tests/xfs/161
index 486fa6ca..5bda7019 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/161
+++ b/tests/xfs/161
@@ -38,15 +38,23 @@ _qmount_option "usrquota"
 _scratch_xfs_db -c 'version' -c 'sb 0' -c 'p' >> $seqres.full
 _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
 
+
+blksz=$(_get_file_block_size "$SCRATCH_MNT")
+# Write more than one block to exceed the soft block quota limit via
+# xfs_quota.
+filesz=$(( 2 * $blksz))
+lim_bsoft=$blksz
+lim_bhard=$(( 100 * blksz ))
+
 # Force the block counters for uid 1 and 2 above zero
-_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 64k $SCRATCH_MNT/a >> $seqres.full
-_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 64k $SCRATCH_MNT/b >> $seqres.full
+_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $filesz $SCRATCH_MNT/a >> $seqres.full
+_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $filesz $SCRATCH_MNT/b >> $seqres.full
 sync
 chown 1 $SCRATCH_MNT/a
 chown 2 $SCRATCH_MNT/b
 
 # Set quota limits on uid 1 before upgrading
-$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft=12k bhard=1m 1' $SCRATCH_MNT
+$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft='"$lim_bsoft"' bhard='"$lim_bhard"' 1' $SCRATCH_MNT
 
 # Make sure the grace period is at /some/ point in the future.  We have to
 # use bc because not all bashes can handle integer comparisons with 64-bit
@@ -71,7 +79,7 @@ _scratch_mount
 
 # Set a very generous grace period and quota limits on uid 2 after upgrading
 $XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'timer -u -b -d 2147483647' $SCRATCH_MNT
-$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft=10000 bhard=150000 2' $SCRATCH_MNT
+$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft='"$lim_bsoft"' bhard='"$lim_bhard"' 2' $SCRATCH_MNT
 
 # Query the grace periods to see if they got set properly after the upgrade.
 repquota -upn $SCRATCH_MNT > $tmp.repquota
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 2/3] generic/436: round up bufsz to nearest filesystem blksz

[Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)]

From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA work in filesystem block size granularity. So
while filling up the buffer for test 13 - 16, round up the bufsz to the
closest filesystem blksz.

As we only allowed blocksizes lower than the pagesize, this was never an
issue and it always aligned. Once we have blocksize > pagesize, this
assumption will break.

Fixes the test for LBS configuration.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
 src/seek_sanity_test.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
index 48b3ccc0..a61ed3da 100644
--- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
+++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int test16(int fd, int testnum)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	char *buf = NULL;
-	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
+	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE), alloc_size);
 	int filsz = 4 << 20;
 
 	if (!unwritten_extents) {
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static int test15(int fd, int testnum)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	char *buf = NULL;
-	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
+	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE), alloc_size);
 	int filsz = 4 << 20;
 
 	if (!unwritten_extents) {
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static int test14(int fd, int testnum)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	char *buf = NULL;
-	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14;
+	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14, alloc_size);
 	int filsz = 4 << 20;
 
 	if (!unwritten_extents) {
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int test13(int fd, int testnum)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	char *buf = NULL;
-	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14;
+	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14, alloc_size);
 	int filsz = 4 << 20;
 
 	if (!unwritten_extents) {
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 3/3] xfs/008: use block size instead of the pagesize

[Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)]

From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

The testcase estimates to have ratio of 1:3/4 for holes:filesize. This
holds true where the blocksize is always less than or equal to pagesize
and the total size of the file is calculated based on the pagesize.
There is an implicit assumption that blocksize will always be less than
the pagesize.

LBS support will enable bs > ps where a minimum IO size is one block,
which can be greater than a page. Adjust the size calculation to be
based on the blocksize and not the pagesize.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
---
 tests/xfs/008     | 19 ++++++++++---------
 tests/xfs/008.out |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/xfs/008 b/tests/xfs/008
index e7d6153b..e37e435a 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/008
+++ b/tests/xfs/008
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ _begin_fstest rw ioctl auto quick
 
 status=0	# success is the default!
 pgsize=`$here/src/feature -s`
-
+fileblksize=$(_get_file_block_size "$TEST_DIR")
+blksize=$((fileblksize > pgsize ? fileblksize : pgsize))
 # Override the default cleanup function.
 _cleanup()
 {
@@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ _cleanup()
 
 _filter()
 {
-    sed -e "s/-b $pgsize/-b PGSIZE/g" \
+    sed -e "s/-b $blksize/-b BLKSIZE/g" \
 	-e "s/-l .* -c/-l FSIZE -c/g"
 }
 
@@ -73,17 +74,17 @@ _require_test
 # We are trying to create roughly 50 or 100 holes in a file
 # using random writes. Assuming a good distribution of 50 writes
 # in a file, the file only needs to be 3-4x the size of the write
-# size muliplied by the number of writes. Hence we use 200 * pgsize
-# for files we want 50 holes in and 400 * pgsize for files we want
+# size muliplied by the number of writes. Hence we use 200 * blksize
+# for files we want 50 holes in and 400 * blksize for files we want
 # 100 holes in. This keeps the runtime down as low as possible.
 #
-_do_test 1 50 "-l `expr 200 \* $pgsize` -c 50 -b $pgsize"
-_do_test 2 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b $pgsize"
-_do_test 3 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b 512"   # test partial pages
+_do_test 1 50 "-l `expr 200 \* $blksize` -c 50 -b $blksize"
+_do_test 2 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b $blksize"
+_do_test 3 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b 512"   # test partial blocks
 
 # rinse, lather, repeat for direct IO
-_do_test 4 50 "-d -l `expr 200 \* $pgsize` -c 50 -b $pgsize"
-_do_test 5 100 "-d -l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b $pgsize"
+_do_test 4 50 "-d -l `expr 200 \* $blksize` -c 50 -b $blksize"
+_do_test 5 100 "-d -l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b $blksize"
 # note: direct IO requires page aligned IO
 
 # todo: realtime.
diff --git a/tests/xfs/008.out b/tests/xfs/008.out
index 5e3ae8e3..0941e218 100644
--- a/tests/xfs/008.out
+++ b/tests/xfs/008.out
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 QA output created by 008
 
-randholes.1 : -l FSIZE -c 50 -b PGSIZE
+randholes.1 : -l FSIZE -c 50 -b BLKSIZE
 ------------------------------------------
 holes is in range
 
-randholes.2 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b PGSIZE
+randholes.2 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b BLKSIZE
 ------------------------------------------
 holes is in range
 
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ randholes.3 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b 512
 ------------------------------------------
 holes is in range
 
-randholes.4 : -d -l FSIZE -c 50 -b PGSIZE
+randholes.4 : -d -l FSIZE -c 50 -b BLKSIZE
 ------------------------------------------
 holes is in range
 
-randholes.5 : -d -l FSIZE -c 100 -b PGSIZE
+randholes.5 : -d -l FSIZE -c 100 -b BLKSIZE
 ------------------------------------------
 holes is in range
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xfs/161: adapt the test case for 64k FS blocksize

[Ritesh Harjani]

"Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com> writes:

> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
>
> This test fails when xfs is formatted with 64k filesystem block size*.
> It fails because the soft quota is not exceeded with the hardcoded 64k
> pwrite, thereby, the grace time is not set. Even though soft quota is
> set to 12k for uid1, it is rounded up to the nearest blocksize.
>
> *** Report for user quotas on device /dev/sdb3
> Block grace time: 7days; Inode grace time: 7days
>                         Block limits                File limits
> User            used    soft    hard  grace    used  soft  hard  grace
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 0        --       0       0       0      0       3     0     0      0
> 1        --      64      64    1024      0       1     0     0      0
> 2        --      64       0       0      0       1     0     0      0
>
> Adapt the pwrite to do twice the FS block size and set the soft limit
> to be 1 FS block and hard limit to be 100 FS blocks. This also gets rid
> of harcoded quota limit values.
>
> * This happens even on a 64k pagesize system and it is not related to
>   LBS effort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

Looks good to me. Small nit below.
(I can verify on Power once I am back)

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>

> ---
>  tests/xfs/161 | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/161 b/tests/xfs/161
> index 486fa6ca..5bda7019 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/161
> +++ b/tests/xfs/161
> @@ -38,15 +38,23 @@ _qmount_option "usrquota"
>  _scratch_xfs_db -c 'version' -c 'sb 0' -c 'p' >> $seqres.full
>  _scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
>  
> +
> +blksz=$(_get_file_block_size "$SCRATCH_MNT")
> +# Write more than one block to exceed the soft block quota limit via
> +# xfs_quota.
> +filesz=$(( 2 * $blksz))
> +lim_bsoft=$blksz
> +lim_bhard=$(( 100 * blksz ))
> +
>  # Force the block counters for uid 1 and 2 above zero
> -_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 64k $SCRATCH_MNT/a >> $seqres.full
> -_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 64k $SCRATCH_MNT/b >> $seqres.full
> +_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $filesz $SCRATCH_MNT/a >> $seqres.full
> +_pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $filesz $SCRATCH_MNT/b >> $seqres.full
>  sync
>  chown 1 $SCRATCH_MNT/a
>  chown 2 $SCRATCH_MNT/b
>  
>  # Set quota limits on uid 1 before upgrading
> -$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft=12k bhard=1m 1' $SCRATCH_MNT
> +$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft='"$lim_bsoft"' bhard='"$lim_bhard"' 1' $SCRATCH_MNT

Small nit: I am not sure if we really need so many quotes for '"$lim_bsoft"' and
"'$lim_bhard"'. 
>  
>  # Make sure the grace period is at /some/ point in the future.  We have to
>  # use bc because not all bashes can handle integer comparisons with 64-bit
> @@ -71,7 +79,7 @@ _scratch_mount
>  
>  # Set a very generous grace period and quota limits on uid 2 after upgrading
>  $XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'timer -u -b -d 2147483647' $SCRATCH_MNT
> -$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft=10000 bhard=150000 2' $SCRATCH_MNT
> +$XFS_QUOTA_PROG -x -c 'limit -u bsoft='"$lim_bsoft"' bhard='"$lim_bhard"' 2' $SCRATCH_MNT
>  
>  # Query the grace periods to see if they got set properly after the upgrade.
>  repquota -upn $SCRATCH_MNT > $tmp.repquota
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] generic/436: round up bufsz to nearest filesystem blksz

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 07:12:53AM -0600, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> 
> SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA work in filesystem block size granularity. So
> while filling up the buffer for test 13 - 16, round up the bufsz to the
> closest filesystem blksz.
> 
> As we only allowed blocksizes lower than the pagesize, this was never an
> issue and it always aligned. Once we have blocksize > pagesize, this
> assumption will break.
> 
> Fixes the test for LBS configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

Seems fine to me
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  src/seek_sanity_test.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> index 48b3ccc0..a61ed3da 100644
> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int test16(int fd, int testnum)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	char *buf = NULL;
> -	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
> +	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE), alloc_size);
>  	int filsz = 4 << 20;
>  
>  	if (!unwritten_extents) {
> @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static int test15(int fd, int testnum)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	char *buf = NULL;
> -	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
> +	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE), alloc_size);
>  	int filsz = 4 << 20;
>  
>  	if (!unwritten_extents) {
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static int test14(int fd, int testnum)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	char *buf = NULL;
> -	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14;
> +	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14, alloc_size);
>  	int filsz = 4 << 20;
>  
>  	if (!unwritten_extents) {
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int test13(int fd, int testnum)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	char *buf = NULL;
> -	int bufsz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14;
> +	int bufsz = roundup(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) * 14, alloc_size);
>  	int filsz = 4 << 20;
>  
>  	if (!unwritten_extents) {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] generic/436: round up bufsz to nearest filesystem blksz

[Ritesh Harjani]

"Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com> writes:

> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
>
> SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA work in filesystem block size granularity. So
> while filling up the buffer for test 13 - 16, round up the bufsz to the
> closest filesystem blksz.
>
> As we only allowed blocksizes lower than the pagesize, this was never an
> issue and it always aligned. Once we have blocksize > pagesize, this
> assumption will break.
>
> Fixes the test for LBS configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> ---
>  src/seek_sanity_test.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

The change looks logical to me to align the bufsz to blocksize rather
than pagesize for bs > ps. roundup() will not have any effect on bs ==
ps or bs < ps.

Also IIUC for LBS, even the page cache will have large folios. So
essentially the folio's folio_size() that we have in the pagecache
matches it's FS blocksize. (So blocksize = folio_size() is anyway true
for LBS). I was curious about this because SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA can query
the pagecache if the filesystem has unwritten extents.

So this make sense that rather than aligning bufsz with base pagesize,
it should be rounded up to FS blocksize to make SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA work
with LBS.

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs/008: use block size instead of the pagesize

[Ritesh Harjani]

"Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com> writes:

> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
>
> The testcase estimates to have ratio of 1:3/4 for holes:filesize. This
> holds true where the blocksize is always less than or equal to pagesize
> and the total size of the file is calculated based on the pagesize.
> There is an implicit assumption that blocksize will always be less than
> the pagesize.
>
> LBS support will enable bs > ps where a minimum IO size is one block,
> which can be greater than a page. Adjust the size calculation to be
> based on the blocksize and not the pagesize.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/008     | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  tests/xfs/008.out |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/008 b/tests/xfs/008
> index e7d6153b..e37e435a 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/008
> +++ b/tests/xfs/008
> @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ _begin_fstest rw ioctl auto quick
>  
>  status=0	# success is the default!
>  pgsize=`$here/src/feature -s`
> -
> +fileblksize=$(_get_file_block_size "$TEST_DIR")
> +blksize=$((fileblksize > pgsize ? fileblksize : pgsize))

I assume when the test might be written it might have assumed blocksize =
pagesize. Hence the dependency on pagesize in this test. 
If that assumption is correct, then we might not need these two paths
and can just make it blocksize.

Do you see any problem with blocksize for any of the paths
(bs = ps, bs < ps and bs > ps)?


>  # Override the default cleanup function.
>  _cleanup()
>  {
> @@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ _cleanup()
>  
>  _filter()
>  {
> -    sed -e "s/-b $pgsize/-b PGSIZE/g" \
> +    sed -e "s/-b $blksize/-b BLKSIZE/g" \
>  	-e "s/-l .* -c/-l FSIZE -c/g"
>  }
>  
> @@ -73,17 +74,17 @@ _require_test
>  # We are trying to create roughly 50 or 100 holes in a file
>  # using random writes. Assuming a good distribution of 50 writes
>  # in a file, the file only needs to be 3-4x the size of the write
> -# size muliplied by the number of writes. Hence we use 200 * pgsize
> -# for files we want 50 holes in and 400 * pgsize for files we want
> +# size muliplied by the number of writes. Hence we use 200 * blksize
> +# for files we want 50 holes in and 400 * blksize for files we want
>  # 100 holes in. This keeps the runtime down as low as possible.
>  #
> -_do_test 1 50 "-l `expr 200 \* $pgsize` -c 50 -b $pgsize"
> -_do_test 2 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b $pgsize"
> -_do_test 3 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b 512"   # test partial pages
> +_do_test 1 50 "-l `expr 200 \* $blksize` -c 50 -b $blksize"
> +_do_test 2 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b $blksize"
> +_do_test 3 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b 512"   # test partial blocks
>  
>  # rinse, lather, repeat for direct IO
> -_do_test 4 50 "-d -l `expr 200 \* $pgsize` -c 50 -b $pgsize"
> -_do_test 5 100 "-d -l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b $pgsize"
> +_do_test 4 50 "-d -l `expr 200 \* $blksize` -c 50 -b $blksize"
> +_do_test 5 100 "-d -l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b $blksize"
>  # note: direct IO requires page aligned IO

^^^ This last comment about direct-io alignment is not valid anymore since kernel
2.6. Maybe it's time to rip that comment off.

From man 2 open
O_DIRECT
<...>
       If  none  of  the  above is available, then direct I/O support and alignment restrictions can only be assumed from known characteristics of the filesystem, the individual file, the underlying storage device(s), and the kernel
       version.  In Linux 2.4, most filesystems based on block devices require that the file offset and the length and memory address of all I/O segments be multiples of the filesystem block size (typically 4096  bytes).   In  Linux
       2.6.0, this was relaxed to the logical block size of the block device (typically 512 bytes).  A block device's logical block size can be determined using the ioctl(2) BLKSSZGET operation or from the shell using the command:

-ritesh

>  
>  # todo: realtime.
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/008.out b/tests/xfs/008.out
> index 5e3ae8e3..0941e218 100644
> --- a/tests/xfs/008.out
> +++ b/tests/xfs/008.out
> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
>  QA output created by 008
>  
> -randholes.1 : -l FSIZE -c 50 -b PGSIZE
> +randholes.1 : -l FSIZE -c 50 -b BLKSIZE
>  ------------------------------------------
>  holes is in range
>  
> -randholes.2 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b PGSIZE
> +randholes.2 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b BLKSIZE
>  ------------------------------------------
>  holes is in range
>  
> @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ randholes.3 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b 512
>  ------------------------------------------
>  holes is in range
>  
> -randholes.4 : -d -l FSIZE -c 50 -b PGSIZE
> +randholes.4 : -d -l FSIZE -c 50 -b BLKSIZE
>  ------------------------------------------
>  holes is in range
>  
> -randholes.5 : -d -l FSIZE -c 100 -b PGSIZE
> +randholes.5 : -d -l FSIZE -c 100 -b BLKSIZE
>  ------------------------------------------
>  holes is in range
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] more lbs test fixes

[Zorro Lang]

Looks like this patchset still has some review points to discuss. I'll
give it more time. The release of this weekend won't have it :)

Thanks,
Zorro

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 07:12:51AM -0600, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> 
> These are some of the tests that failed when we were working on LBS
> patches [1].
> 
> generic/436 and xfs/008 are adapted to work with bs > ps systems.
> 
> xfs/161 is an upstream failure, and it happens even on bs <= ps systems.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Corrected copy pasta error in generic/436
> - xfs/161 removed hardcoded and incorporated ritesh's comments
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240503095353.3798063-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
> 
> Pankaj Raghav (3):
>   xfs/161: adapt the test case for 64k FS blocksize
>   generic/436: round up bufsz to nearest filesystem blksz
>   xfs/008: use block size instead of the pagesize
> 
>  src/seek_sanity_test.c |  8 ++++----
>  tests/xfs/008          | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  tests/xfs/008.out      |  8 ++++----
>  tests/xfs/161          | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: b26d68da08e47e6508a96bee72b25823040ab67e
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs/008: use block size instead of the pagesize

[Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)]

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:55:25AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com> writes:
> 
> > From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> >
> > The testcase estimates to have ratio of 1:3/4 for holes:filesize. This
> > holds true where the blocksize is always less than or equal to pagesize
> > and the total size of the file is calculated based on the pagesize.
> > There is an implicit assumption that blocksize will always be less than
> > the pagesize.
> >
> > LBS support will enable bs > ps where a minimum IO size is one block,
> > which can be greater than a page. Adjust the size calculation to be
> > based on the blocksize and not the pagesize.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/xfs/008     | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >  tests/xfs/008.out |  8 ++++----
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/008 b/tests/xfs/008
> > index e7d6153b..e37e435a 100755
> > --- a/tests/xfs/008
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/008
> > @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ _begin_fstest rw ioctl auto quick
> >  
> >  status=0	# success is the default!
> >  pgsize=`$here/src/feature -s`
> > -
> > +fileblksize=$(_get_file_block_size "$TEST_DIR")
> > +blksize=$((fileblksize > pgsize ? fileblksize : pgsize))
> 
> I assume when the test might be written it might have assumed blocksize =
> pagesize. Hence the dependency on pagesize in this test. 
> If that assumption is correct, then we might not need these two paths
> and can just make it blocksize.
> 
> Do you see any problem with blocksize for any of the paths
> (bs = ps, bs < ps and bs > ps)?
Thanks for the comments Ritesh. You are right about not needing to
fallback to pgsize.

I made your suggested changes and I will send a new version soon.
> 
> 
> >  # Override the default cleanup function.
> >  _cleanup()
> >  {
> > @@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ _cleanup()
> >  
> >  _filter()
> >  {
> > -    sed -e "s/-b $pgsize/-b PGSIZE/g" \
> > +    sed -e "s/-b $blksize/-b BLKSIZE/g" \
> >  	-e "s/-l .* -c/-l FSIZE -c/g"
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -73,17 +74,17 @@ _require_test
> >  # We are trying to create roughly 50 or 100 holes in a file
> >  # using random writes. Assuming a good distribution of 50 writes
> >  # in a file, the file only needs to be 3-4x the size of the write
> > -# size muliplied by the number of writes. Hence we use 200 * pgsize
> > -# for files we want 50 holes in and 400 * pgsize for files we want
> > +# size muliplied by the number of writes. Hence we use 200 * blksize
> > +# for files we want 50 holes in and 400 * blksize for files we want
> >  # 100 holes in. This keeps the runtime down as low as possible.
> >  #
> > -_do_test 1 50 "-l `expr 200 \* $pgsize` -c 50 -b $pgsize"
> > -_do_test 2 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b $pgsize"
> > -_do_test 3 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b 512"   # test partial pages
> > +_do_test 1 50 "-l `expr 200 \* $blksize` -c 50 -b $blksize"
> > +_do_test 2 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b $blksize"
> > +_do_test 3 100 "-l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b 512"   # test partial blocks
> >  
> >  # rinse, lather, repeat for direct IO
> > -_do_test 4 50 "-d -l `expr 200 \* $pgsize` -c 50 -b $pgsize"
> > -_do_test 5 100 "-d -l `expr 400 \* $pgsize` -c 100 -b $pgsize"
> > +_do_test 4 50 "-d -l `expr 200 \* $blksize` -c 50 -b $blksize"
> > +_do_test 5 100 "-d -l `expr 400 \* $blksize` -c 100 -b $blksize"
> >  # note: direct IO requires page aligned IO
> 
> ^^^ This last comment about direct-io alignment is not valid anymore since kernel
> 2.6. Maybe it's time to rip that comment off.
> 
> From man 2 open
> O_DIRECT
> <...>
>        If  none  of  the  above is available, then direct I/O support and alignment restrictions can only be assumed from known characteristics of the filesystem, the individual file, the underlying storage device(s), and the kernel
>        version.  In Linux 2.4, most filesystems based on block devices require that the file offset and the length and memory address of all I/O segments be multiples of the filesystem block size (typically 4096  bytes).   In  Linux
>        2.6.0, this was relaxed to the logical block size of the block device (typically 512 bytes).  A block device's logical block size can be determined using the ioctl(2) BLKSSZGET operation or from the shell using the command:
> 
> -ritesh
> 
> >  
> >  # todo: realtime.
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/008.out b/tests/xfs/008.out
> > index 5e3ae8e3..0941e218 100644
> > --- a/tests/xfs/008.out
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/008.out
> > @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
> >  QA output created by 008
> >  
> > -randholes.1 : -l FSIZE -c 50 -b PGSIZE
> > +randholes.1 : -l FSIZE -c 50 -b BLKSIZE
> >  ------------------------------------------
> >  holes is in range
> >  
> > -randholes.2 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b PGSIZE
> > +randholes.2 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b BLKSIZE
> >  ------------------------------------------
> >  holes is in range
> >  
> > @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ randholes.3 : -l FSIZE -c 100 -b 512
> >  ------------------------------------------
> >  holes is in range
> >  
> > -randholes.4 : -d -l FSIZE -c 50 -b PGSIZE
> > +randholes.4 : -d -l FSIZE -c 50 -b BLKSIZE
> >  ------------------------------------------
> >  holes is in range
> >  
> > -randholes.5 : -d -l FSIZE -c 100 -b PGSIZE
> > +randholes.5 : -d -l FSIZE -c 100 -b BLKSIZE
> >  ------------------------------------------
> >  holes is in range
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1

-- 
Pankaj Raghav