From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@suse.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: remove unused AC_PACKAGE_NEED_OPEN_BY_FSHANDLE macro
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:57:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXVmYJdOHSRTB6wz@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWW1esouYFRcbuHf@technoir>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:19:06PM +0200, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:39:46AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:50:57PM +0200, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote:
> > > Commit 5868405dce1d ("Sync up different copies of the m4 macros, noop
> > > change for this package.") introduced this macro, by the function was
> > > never really used by any test, remove it.
> >
> > If we're not going to keep this in sync (with what I have no idea) then
> > why not remove the other unused macros?
>
> This was standing out as I was looking specifically into fstests
> dependencies to libhandle, but I didn't make a full pass through the
> rest. Indeed at least AC_PACKAGE_NEED_LIBXFSINIT_LIBXFS seems also
> unused.
>
> From looking at earlier commits, I think sync was referring to bringing
> the m4 macros up to date with the rest of the packages (xfsprogs,
> xfsdump at least). Commit c1ef92a938a1 ("Updates to QA scrdiff script to
> keep package configure macros in sync.") includes the following comment:
Wow, that was more than 18 years ago, and I don't think we've kept the
m4 files in sync after that.
So I tend to agree with Darrick that it'd be better to removing other
unused macros all together. And I did a quick search[1] and it looked like
the following macros are only defined but not used anywhere:
AC_HAVE_FADVISE
AC_HAVE_MADVISE
AC_HAVE_MINCORE
AC_HAVE_SENDFILE
AC_HAVE_GETMNTENT
AC_HAVE_GETMNTINFO
AC_PACKAGE_NEED_NCURSES_H
AC_PACKAGE_WANT_WORKING_LIBNCURSES
AC_PACKAGE_NEED_PTHREAD_H
AC_PACKAGE_NEED_PTHREADMUTEXINIT
AC_TYPE_PSINT
AC_TYPE_PSUNSIGNED
AC_SIZEOF_POINTERS_AND_LONG
AC_PACKAGE_NEED_UUID_H
AC_PACKAGE_NEED_LIBXFSINIT_LIBXFS
AC_PACKAGE_NEED_OPEN_BY_FSHANDLE
AC_FUNC_GCC_VISIBILITY
Thanks,
Eryu
P.S.
[1] the script to do the search
for m in `git grep AC_DEFUN | grep -o AC_[PHTSF].*[A-Z]`; do
cnt=`git grep $m | wc -l`
if [ $cnt -lt 2 ]; then
echo $m
fi
done
>
> "xfstests directory m4 directory is a repository of all of the custom
> m4 macros used in the packages we look after."
>
> I just checked xfsdump and most of the macros in package_xfslibs.m4 are
> indeed unused.
>
> Regards,
> Anthony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-24 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-12 13:50 [PATCH] build: remove unused AC_PACKAGE_NEED_OPEN_BY_FSHANDLE macro Anthony Iliopoulos
2021-10-12 14:28 ` David Disseldorp
2021-10-12 15:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-12 16:19 ` Anthony Iliopoulos
2021-10-24 13:57 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXVmYJdOHSRTB6wz@desktop \
--to=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=ailiop@suse.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox