From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] generic/131: wait until the server is ready
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 16:56:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d258d755-a081-72c8-e596-6ec16fa193cb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181229081430.GG21777@desktop>
Hi,
On 2018/12/29 16:14, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:34:50AM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
>> When running xfstests under KVM VM and the load of host is high,
>> only delaying 1s and checking the readiness of server are not
>> enough, and the test case will fail early.
>>
>> Fix it by repeatedly checking the readiness signal until it's found,
>> or the server exits.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> tests/generic/131 | 19 +++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/131 b/tests/generic/131
>> index d7c146ae..1af86e77 100755
>> --- a/tests/generic/131
>> +++ b/tests/generic/131
>> @@ -37,13 +37,20 @@ TESTFILE=$TEST_DIR/lock_file
>> src/locktest $TESTFILE 2>&1 > $TEST_DIR/server.out &
>> locktest_pid1=$!
>>
>> -sleep 1
>> +while true; do
>> + sleep 1
>
> Looks like we'll loop forever if the locktest process is there but fails
> to print out the server port due to random reasons.
>
> I think it's better to retry N times and give up if the server is still
> not ready.
>
Thanks for your suggestion, will send v2 soon.
> Thanks,
> Eryu
>
>>
>> -PORT=$(cat $TEST_DIR/server.out | grep "^server port: " | awk '{print $3}')
>> -if [ -z $PORT ]; then
>> - echo "Could not get server port"
>> - exit 1
>> -fi
>> + PORT=$(cat $TEST_DIR/server.out | grep "^server port: " | awk '{print $3}')
>> + if [ -n "$PORT" ]; then
>> + break
>> + fi
>> +
>> + # check the existence of server process
>> + if ! kill -s 0 $locktest_pid1 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
>> + echo "Could not get server port"
>> + exit 1
>> + fi
>> +done
>>
>> # Start the client
>> src/locktest -p $PORT -h localhost $TESTFILE 2>&1 > $TEST_DIR/client.out
>> --
>> 2.16.2.dirty
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-29 2:34 [PATCH 0/5] tiny fixes for xfstests Hou Tao
2018-12-29 2:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] check: use _try_scratch_mount instead of _scratch_mount to mount SCRATCH_DEV Hou Tao
2018-12-29 2:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] generic/019: check scratch device is a block device or not Hou Tao
2018-12-29 2:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] generic/131: wait until the server is ready Hou Tao
2018-12-29 8:14 ` Eryu Guan
2019-01-04 8:56 ` Hou Tao [this message]
2018-12-29 2:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] generic/466: explicitly request $SCRATCH_DEV to be a block device Hou Tao
2018-12-29 2:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] fsx: check ENOSYS in test_copy_range() Hou Tao
2018-12-29 8:16 ` Eryu Guan
2018-12-29 18:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-01-04 8:57 ` Hou Tao
2018-12-29 18:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d258d755-a081-72c8-e596-6ec16fa193cb@huawei.com \
--to=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox