* RE: Computing the number of patches in linux-next tree
2008-07-22 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2008-07-22 17:13 ` Luck, Tony
2008-07-22 17:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-22 18:23 ` Harvey Harrison
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Luck, Tony @ 2008-07-22 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano, Johannes Schindelin; +Cc: Git Mailing List
>> git merge-base --all <branch1> <branch2>
>>
>> Be warned: there might be multiple merge bases.
>
> I do not think that approach applies to linux-next, which is constantly
> rewound to the then-tip-of-linus and merge remaining bits. The question
> is "where does this branch begin", which does not have an answer in git.
Using git merge-base on the next-20080701 tag and current Linus tree I get
76 possible merge bases. None of them appear to be the "right" one (if
I check out this tag and look at Next/merge.log the right answer appears
to be 1702b52 if I'm reading the log correctly).
Perhaps my best hope is to
$ git checkout $tag Next/merge.log
... parse merge.log to figure out $base ...
-Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Computing the number of patches in linux-next tree
2008-07-22 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-22 17:13 ` Luck, Tony
@ 2008-07-22 17:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-22 18:23 ` Harvey Harrison
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2008-07-22 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Tony Luck, Git Mailing List
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Tony Luck wrote:
> >
> >> git tag | grep next- | sort | while read tag
> >
> > This should not be necessary... AFAICT "git tag" sorts its output already.
> >
> >> What does the "git-where-did-this-tag-branch-from-linus" command look like?
> >
> > git merge-base --all <branch1> <branch2>
> >
> > Be warned: there might be multiple merge bases.
>
> I do not think that approach applies to linux-next, which is constantly
> rewound to the then-tip-of-linus and merge remaining bits. The question
> is "where does this branch begin", which does not have an answer in git.
Oh.
Well, there is one thing that _could_ work most of the time, namely
looking at the committer info of the first parent.
Dunno,
Dscho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Computing the number of patches in linux-next tree
2008-07-22 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-22 17:13 ` Luck, Tony
2008-07-22 17:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2008-07-22 18:23 ` Harvey Harrison
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2008-07-22 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin, Tony Luck, Git Mailing List
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 10:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Tony Luck wrote:
> >
> >> git tag | grep next- | sort | while read tag
> >
> > This should not be necessary... AFAICT "git tag" sorts its output already.
> >
> >> What does the "git-where-did-this-tag-branch-from-linus" command look like?
> >
> > git merge-base --all <branch1> <branch2>
> >
> > Be warned: there might be multiple merge bases.
>
> I do not think that approach applies to linux-next, which is constantly
> rewound to the then-tip-of-linus and merge remaining bits. The question
> is "where does this branch begin", which does not have an answer in git.
I thought that was what Stephen has the next/stable branch for:
git log --pretty=oneline --no-merges next/stable..next/master | wc -l
At least for each day you can find the number of patches....I don't
think he tags the stable points, so historically that may be a problem.
Harvey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread