From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>,
Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)?
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:45:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050728184525.GA3144@mythryan2.michonline.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507281931180.30371@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 07:32:55PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Is it possible that those plans only mean to centralize .git/objects/ and
> leave the rest in single repositories? Seems much more sensible to me.
I think that's accurate. It can be done without the repositories even
really noticing if "git relink" is used aggressively to migrate
hard links into the repository regularly. (Though, "packs" cause some
confusion in that scheme, I think.)
--
Ryan Anderson
sometimes Pug Majere
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-28 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-27 12:58 How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Josef Weidendorfer
2005-07-28 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-28 12:08 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 13:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 15:35 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 15:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 16:18 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 16:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-28 17:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 18:45 ` Ryan Anderson [this message]
2005-07-28 18:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 18:39 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 18:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 19:47 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-28 20:14 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 7:11 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 2:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 7:06 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 7:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 8:10 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 9:40 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 10:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 11:13 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 12:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 12:28 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-30 2:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 20:40 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-30 22:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-08-13 4:11 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-08-13 7:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-08-15 16:23 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-08-15 23:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 9:10 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2005-07-28 21:13 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-29 7:14 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 18:53 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2005-07-28 19:19 ` Unnamed branches Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 16:14 ` How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Junio C Hamano
2005-07-28 16:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 15:35 ` Petr Baudis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050728184525.GA3144@mythryan2.michonline.com \
--to=ryan@michonline.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox