From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)?
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:16:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vfytwym5r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vek9igfgw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:54:07 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
> Having said that, I do not particulary think allowing push to
> write into different ref is an unreasonable thing. As you
> pointed out long time ago when send-pack was first done, the
> protocol is not so easily extensible, so this may require either
> backward incompatible protocol change, or introduction of a new
> program pair send-pack-2 / receive-pack-2. I'll take a look
> sometime this weekend. Bedtime.
Again, what Linus designed turns out to be perfect. It does not
appear to need a protocol level change at all. I'll code up
something over the weekend if I am lucky.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-30 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-27 12:58 How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Josef Weidendorfer
2005-07-28 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-28 12:08 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 13:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 15:35 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 15:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 16:18 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 16:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-28 17:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 18:45 ` Ryan Anderson
2005-07-28 18:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 18:39 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 18:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-28 19:47 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-28 20:14 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 7:11 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 2:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 7:06 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 7:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 8:10 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 8:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 9:40 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 10:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 11:13 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-29 12:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 12:28 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-30 2:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-07-29 20:40 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-30 22:16 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2005-08-13 4:11 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-08-13 7:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-08-15 16:23 ` Carl Baldwin
2005-08-15 23:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-07-29 9:10 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2005-07-28 21:13 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-07-29 7:14 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 18:53 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2005-07-28 19:19 ` Unnamed branches Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 16:14 ` How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Junio C Hamano
2005-07-28 16:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-07-28 15:35 ` Petr Baudis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vfytwym5r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox