Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft.
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:55:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060519185558.GE6535@nowhere.earth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vsln7lzbj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 03:53:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:
> 
> > To make my point maybe more clear: if someone really wants to make a
> > graft permanent, wouldn't some history rewriting ... be the
> > way to go,...
> 
> Yes.

So if temporary usage is a typical use for grafts, don't we want to
protect people using them from pruning ?  I got no feedback to my
suggestion of changing the default behaviour, even to say it was a bad
idea :)

Best regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson    <ydirson@altern.org> |
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-19 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-18 21:35 [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft Yann Dirson
2006-05-18 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-18 21:46   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-18 22:01     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-18 22:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-18 22:20     ` Yann Dirson
2006-05-18 22:36       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-18 22:52       ` Yann Dirson
2006-05-18 22:53         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-19 18:55           ` Yann Dirson [this message]
2006-05-19 19:00             ` Jakub Narebski
2006-05-19 19:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-19 20:25               ` Yann Dirson
2006-05-19 20:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-19 22:22               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-19 22:26               ` [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw awayrevs " David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060519185558.GE6535@nowhere.earth \
    --to=ydirson@altern.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox