Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rebase: add --revisions flag
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:37:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091209093758.GA2977@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912090941420.470@ds9.cixit.se>

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Peter Krefting wrote:
> Junio C Hamano:
>
>> Many people wanted to have "pick many commits onto the current HEAD" 
>> and I think it would be a natural, uncontroversial and welcome addition 
>> to allow "git cherry-pick A..B".
>
> Or even "git cherry-pick branch", as I naïvely tried doing before I  
> understood what it did. This is definitely a feature that would help me.
>
> The question of where it goes is actually a bit difficult, it is the same 
> mode of operation as "git rebase", only the other way around. It is the 
> same as "git cherry-pick", but called multiple times. And it is the same 
> as "git merge --squash", but without squashing the commits into one.
>
> So does this new mode go into rebase, cherry-pick or merge, or into all  
> three? No matter which, proper documentation is needed.
>
>
> Maybe this could also be used to implement a "git merge --squash A..B", 
> a.k.a a "partial merge".

What exactly should it do?

> (And if it could be implemented to allow a "git 
> merge A..B" and later do a "git merge B" to merge the rest of the 
> side-branch, that would be interesting).

rebase already tries to detect previously applied commits.
Maybe we can teach it to use more heuristics.

> -- 
> \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-09  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-08 14:47 [PATCH RFC] rebase: add --revisions flag Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 16:08 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 16:41     ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:49       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 19:13         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:14   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 16:37     ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 16:44       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-08 19:11         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-08 20:00           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 13:19             ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 14:02               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09  4:51         ` Miles Bader
2009-12-08 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-08 20:29   ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-12-09  5:30     ` Christian Couder
2009-12-09  6:52       ` Christian Couder
2009-12-09  9:08         ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-12-09  8:47   ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-09  9:37     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-12-09 10:52       ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-09 11:22         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 11:48           ` Andreas Schwab
2009-12-09 12:06             ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 12:07               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 13:06                 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 19:46                   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-10  7:43                     ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-10 17:20                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 11:07                         ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 13:20           ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-09 13:41             ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-10  8:43               ` Peter Krefting
2009-12-10 11:08                 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 10:38   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 10:55     ` Matthieu Moy
2009-12-09 13:30   ` Matthieu Moy
2009-12-09 13:45     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 14:01       ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-09 14:12         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-09 20:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-13 22:47   ` David Kågedal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091209093758.GA2977@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peter@softwolves.pp.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox